[Battlefield 1943] Official Website with Trailer

2009-02-09 14:17:50

#226

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

[CFH]metalmechanic wrote:
no they are not changing it to 64 players. matchmaking is horrible. i cant begin to think about how much wake would suck if 24 people is the most i could ever hope for. thats just stupid. they love console games to much now and are just gonna port some piece of crap over to the pc... and im sure they will do it poorly.

but ill keep my fingers crossed. hope they hear everyone complaining about 24 people(ya right) change that. add more classes, and maybe make another "good" game. and when that doesnt happen ill hope they dont make bc2 the same as this one...

There isn't anything wrong with 3 classes. Maybe add a 4th class, but I'd rather they'd keep it small.

Sambuccashake wrote:
I'm fairly certain that they're using BF:BC2 and 1943 as a frostbite PC "beta" in order to get everything just right for BF3.

Um, I really doubt that.

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-02-09 22:37:37

#227

Bradt3hleader: Care [ ] - Don't care [x]; +121|6150

Well anyway they said there's a big single player campaign with unlinear missions and we can determine how the battle/story will end. So maybe the focus is on that. And Wake Island isn't the only map so maybe the other ones are smaller and more bottlenecked so the 24 people aren't running 10km to find somebody then get huge lag and crash.

2009-02-09 23:52:01

#228

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

Bradt3hleader wrote:
Well anyway they said there's a big single player campaign with unlinear missions and we can determine how the battle/story will end. So maybe the focus is on that. And Wake Island isn't the only map so maybe the other ones are smaller and more bottlenecked so the 24 people aren't running 10km to find somebody then get huge lag and crash.

Iwo Jima and Guadalcanal were the biggest pacific maps.

Edit: It'd be cool if they brought back Coral Sea, I loved that map the most out of all the pacific maps.

Last edited by War Man (2009-02-09 23:53:20)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-02-10 13:47:34

#229

Drunk_Musketeer: To be honest I don't care anyway..; +57|6952|Great Wall

shit.. at least 32 players needed.. 24 that sucks.

2009-02-10 15:41:22

#230

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

Drunk_Musketeer wrote:
shit.. at least 32 players needed.. 24 that sucks.

For console it doesn't, for pc it does.

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-02-10 15:42:07

#231

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

War Man wrote:
Drunk_Musketeer wrote:
shit.. at least 32 players needed.. 24 that sucks.
For console it doesn't, for pc it does.

It still does for consoles, it just doesn't seem like it does because every game on consoles is that shitty.

2009-02-10 18:52:19

#232

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6752|Long Island, New York

Miggle wrote:
War Man wrote:
Drunk_Musketeer wrote:
shit.. at least 32 players needed.. 24 that sucks.
For console it doesn't, for pc it does.
It still does for consoles, it just doesn't seem like it does because every game on consoles is that shitty.

Like MGS4 amirite?

2009-02-10 18:53:01

#233

oxo: Member; +3|5775|Texas

War Man wrote:
YESSSSSSSSS, bf1943 and as destructible as bad company, hehehe. I hope they bring back the classiness of bf1942 in it as well. Also hopefully the pc version will have 64 players, they might be concentrating on the console versions more than the computer one which is why they said 24.

Edit: I also hope they have class customizing

battlefield 1942 was one of best games ever in my opinion ...... but they need to remake it with the frostbyte engine keep the maps and fix game play a bit ........ they need to do same with bf2..... read my post with features of 1943

2009-02-10 18:54:06

#234

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

Miggle wrote:
War Man wrote:
Drunk_Musketeer wrote:
shit.. at least 32 players needed.. 24 that sucks.
For console it doesn't, for pc it does.
It still does for consoles, it just doesn't seem like it does because every game on consoles is that shitty.

Maybe ps3 to have 32 players, but not xbox 360 as it can't support 32 players.

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-02-11 03:12:25

#235

Spidery_Yoda: Member; +399|6484

War Man wrote:
Miggle wrote:
War Man wrote:
For console it doesn't, for pc it does.
It still does for consoles, it just doesn't seem like it does because every game on consoles is that shitty.
Maybe ps3 to have 32 players, but not xbox 360 as it can't support 32 players.

Frontlines Fuel of War on both systems had 50 players.

Actually.

It of course used dedicated servers. So it's definitely an option for Live games.

Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2009-02-11 03:13:16)

2009-02-11 14:50:48

#236

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

Spidery_Yoda wrote:
War Man wrote:
Miggle wrote:

It still does for consoles, it just doesn't seem like it does because every game on consoles is that shitty.
Maybe ps3 to have 32 players, but not xbox 360 as it can't support 32 players.
Frontlines Fuel of War on both systems had 50 players.

Actually.

It of course used dedicated servers. So it's definitely an option for Live games.

Well if that's the case, then ok. I think we should email EA to make it 32 players.

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-02-11 15:18:59

#237

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

War Man wrote:
Spidery_Yoda wrote:
War Man wrote:

Maybe ps3 to have 32 players, but not xbox 360 as it can't support 32 players.
Frontlines Fuel of War on both systems had 50 players.

Actually.

It of course used dedicated servers. So it's definitely an option for Live games.
Well if that's the case, then ok. I think we should email EA to make it 32 players.

go for it.

2009-02-12 10:06:09

#238

Bradt3hleader: Care [ ] - Don't care [x]; +121|6150

You guys are already saying this game is dead before it has come out. Look at this! This might mean more maps and easier acces to patches and DLC.

https://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u176/Swiss-Brad/ownedbitches.jpg

2009-02-12 12:51:14

#239

OmniDeath: ~; +726|6858

Bradt3hleader wrote:
You guys are already saying this game is dead before it has come out. Look at this! This might mean more maps and easier acces to patches and DLC.

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u176 … itches.jpg

I don't see what you're talking about... what am I supposed to be looking at?

2009-02-12 12:54:03

#240

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6847

OmniDeath wrote:
Bradt3hleader wrote:
You guys are already saying this game is dead before it has come out. Look at this! This might mean more maps and easier acces to patches and DLC.

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u176 … itches.jpg
I don't see what you're talking about... what am I supposed to be looking at?

He's saying that although the game will only come with three maps, you may be able to download extra maps with updates or something.

2009-02-12 13:08:30

#241

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

Bradt3hleader wrote:
You guys are already saying this game is dead before it has come out. Look at this! This might mean more maps and easier acces to patches and DLC.

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u176 … itches.jpg

I see that as a bad thing.

Paying for patches, it's pathetic.

2009-02-12 13:33:26

#242

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6752|Long Island, New York

Bradt3hleader wrote:
You guys are already saying this game is dead before it has come out. Look at this! This might mean more maps and easier acces to patches and DLC.

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u176 … itches.jpg

Since when has DLC made a bad game good?

Not saying 1943's gonna be bad, but come on..

2009-02-12 14:18:27

#243

Noobpatty: ʎʇʇɐdqoou; +194|6568|West NY

Stalingrad, 1943, anyone?

2009-02-12 14:19:25

#244

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

Noobpatty wrote:
Stalingrad, 1943, anyone?

That's if they add Russians and Germans.
Edit: But they won't as they will focus in the Pacific.

Last edited by War Man (2009-02-12 14:19:46)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-02-12 15:52:42

#245

Fenix14: scout rush kekeke ^___^; +116|6771|Brisbane, Aus

This sounds like nothing more than a Stand-alone mod, not even that due to its size.

And with download content, I can't see dice pulling thought with enough extra content (IE; moar maps/theaters ) to make it work.

2009-02-12 17:29:55

#246

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

Miggle wrote:
Bradt3hleader wrote:
You guys are already saying this game is dead before it has come out. Look at this! This might mean more maps and easier acces to patches and DLC.

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u176 … itches.jpg
I see that as a bad thing.

Paying for patches, it's pathetic.

Who says you are paying for patches, the maps that require money would be separate from the patches

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-02-12 17:49:41

#247

Noobpatty: ʎʇʇɐdqoou; +194|6568|West NY

That sucks
I enjoyed cutting down nazis with my DP lmg in bf1942

2009-02-13 00:02:10

#248

Machine_Madness: Madness has now come over me; +20|6651|Brisbane, Australia

http://csnation.totalgamingnetwork.com/ … php/10620/

It looked great and all but after reading that ^^^

Im pretty sure I aint buying it now.

Last edited by Machine_Madness (2009-02-13 00:03:12)

2009-02-13 08:53:56

#249

Bradt3hleader: Care [ ] - Don't care [x]; +121|6150

Fenix14 wrote:
This sounds like nothing more than a Stand-alone mod, not even that due to its size.

And with download content, I can't see dice pulling thought with enough extra content (IE; moar maps/theaters ) to make it work.

Yet BF2 is a giant frag fest of 12 year old no-lifes (I'm generalizing) and the PR team made it into a wonderful game.

2009-02-13 12:19:37

#250

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

War Man wrote:
Miggle wrote:
Bradt3hleader wrote:
You guys are already saying this game is dead before it has come out. Look at this! This might mean more maps and easier acces to patches and DLC.

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u176 … itches.jpg
I see that as a bad thing.

Paying for patches, it's pathetic.
Who says you are paying for patches, the maps that require money would be separate from the patches

updates should be free.

BF2S Forums [Battlefield 1943] Official Website with Trailer

[CFH]metalmechanic wrote:

Sambuccashake wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Drunk_Musketeer wrote:

War Man wrote:

Drunk_Musketeer wrote:

Miggle wrote:

War Man wrote:

Drunk_Musketeer wrote:

War Man wrote:

Miggle wrote:

War Man wrote:

Drunk_Musketeer wrote:

War Man wrote:

Miggle wrote:

War Man wrote:

Spidery_Yoda wrote:

War Man wrote:

Miggle wrote:

War Man wrote:

Spidery_Yoda wrote:

War Man wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

OmniDeath wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Noobpatty wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Fenix14 wrote:

War Man wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Board footer