BF2 1.50 patch news

Pages: 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 21

Index »
Games »
Battlefield Series »
Battlefield 2 »
BF2 1.50 patch news

2009-01-04 13:58:17

#251

SteikeTa: Member; +153|6758|Norway/Norwegen/ Norge/Noruega

Actually, the F35B CAN dodge missiles. With and without flares! If you are a better player/pilot, you will take down the J10! You have missiles and mg's.... if you don't like it, don't use that plane. But noooo... now we will get a patch because people have complained a LOT! Don't have to stay over 800 to dogde missiles, it's perfectly capable to do that under that altitude as well.

Hitting the J10 with missiles is no problem either. Don't have to keep the J10s down on the ground (base raping Wake airfield).

Should fix things like squad bug, CTD (maybe that's just this computer, I don't know), getting rid of cheaters... probably wont be able to. They removed the ability to jump and shoot, chuck C4, and so on and so on....

2009-01-04 17:18:14

#252

mnishimura00: I ruin Wake Island for everybody.; +15|6194

I hope they implement widescreen support. Too bad they dont fix the damn miniguns that they broke on the Black Hawks.

2009-01-04 17:36:36

#253

Hakei: Banned; +295|6005

SteikeTa wrote:
Actually, the F35B CAN dodge missiles. With and without flares! If you are a better player/pilot, you will take down the J10! You have missiles and mg's.... if you don't like it, don't use that plane. But noooo... now we will get a patch because people have complained a LOT! Don't have to stay over 800 to dogde missiles, it's perfectly capable to do that under that altitude as well.

Hitting the J10 with missiles is no problem either. Don't have to keep the J10s down on the ground (base raping Wake airfield).

Should fix things like squad bug, CTD (maybe that's just this computer, I don't know), getting rid of cheaters... probably wont be able to. They removed the ability to jump and shoot, chuck C4, and so on and so on....

If you'd like, I can come to a Euro wake airshow server and we can have a 1v1 - You have F35, I have J10, even with a 300 ping I bet the better jet will be shown ;/

2009-01-04 17:38:07

#254

~FuzZz~: .yag era uoy fi siht deaR; +422|6332|Orrstrayleea

Hakei wrote:
SteikeTa wrote:
Actually, the F35B CAN dodge missiles. With and without flares! If you are a better player/pilot, you will take down the J10! You have missiles and mg's.... if you don't like it, don't use that plane. But noooo... now we will get a patch because people have complained a LOT! Don't have to stay over 800 to dogde missiles, it's perfectly capable to do that under that altitude as well.

Hitting the J10 with missiles is no problem either. Don't have to keep the J10s down on the ground (base raping Wake airfield).

Should fix things like squad bug, CTD (maybe that's just this computer, I don't know), getting rid of cheaters... probably wont be able to. They removed the ability to jump and shoot, chuck C4, and so on and so on....
If you'd like, I can come to a Euro wake airshow server and we can have a 1v1 - You have F35, I have J10, even with a 300 ping I bet the better jet will be shown ;/

fraps it tbf

2009-01-05 03:55:23

#255

Fat_Swinub: jaff; +125|6445

SteikeTa wrote:
Actually, the F35B CAN dodge missiles. With and without flares! If you are a better player/pilot, you will take down the J10! You have missiles and mg's.... if you don't like it, don't use that plane. But noooo... now we will get a patch because people have complained a LOT! Don't have to stay over 800 to dogde missiles, it's perfectly capable to do that under that altitude as well.

Cool thanks for telling us how so we know you're not talking a load of shit.

2009-01-05 05:39:53

#256

GateKeeper{NL}: Member; +142|6379

Replace the F-35 with F-18's!

OR..

Decrease the speed of the J-10 @ sea level

2009-01-05 06:08:46

#257

SteikeTa: Member; +153|6758|Norway/Norwegen/ Norge/Noruega

Hakei wrote:
SteikeTa wrote:
Actually, the F35B CAN dodge missiles. With and without flares! If you are a better player/pilot, you will take down the J10! You have missiles and mg's.... if you don't like it, don't use that plane. But noooo... now we will get a patch because people have complained a LOT! Don't have to stay over 800 to dogde missiles, it's perfectly capable to do that under that altitude as well.

Hitting the J10 with missiles is no problem either. Don't have to keep the J10s down on the ground (base raping Wake airfield).

Should fix things like squad bug, CTD (maybe that's just this computer, I don't know), getting rid of cheaters... probably wont be able to. They removed the ability to jump and shoot, chuck C4, and so on and so on....
If you'd like, I can come to a Euro wake airshow server and we can have a 1v1 - You have F35, I have J10, even with a 300 ping I bet the better jet will be shown ;/

Yeah, we can do that. I'm back in school now, so wait til next time I have a vaccation!

2009-01-05 06:27:28

#258

Fat_Swinub: jaff; +125|6445

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
Replace the F-35 with F-18's!

OR..

Decrease the speed of the J-10 @ sea level

Replace jet's missiles with grenade launchers

OR..

Something equally as stupid

2009-01-05 07:36:13

#259

_Dominiko_PL: TITS or gtfo.; +97|6531|Polish state of EU

Fat_Swinub wrote:
GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
Replace the F-35 with F-18's!

OR..

Decrease the speed of the J-10 @ sea level
Replace jet's missiles with grenade launchers

OR..

Something equally as stupid

^^ that would be awesome, just dont forget [DICE] to put teh J10s on Karkand!

2009-01-05 09:52:07

#260

battlejim: Member; +1|5612|Air

SteikeTa wrote:
Actually, the F35B CAN dodge missiles. With and without flares! If you are a better player/pilot, you will take down the J10! You have missiles and mg's.... if you don't like it, don't use that plane. But noooo... now we will get a patch because people have complained a LOT! Don't have to stay over 800 to dogde missiles, it's perfectly capable to do that under that altitude as well.

Hitting the J10 with missiles is no problem either. Don't have to keep the J10s down on the ground (base raping Wake airfield).

Should fix things like squad bug, CTD (maybe that's just this computer, I don't know), getting rid of cheaters... probably wont be able to. They removed the ability to jump and shoot, chuck C4, and so on and so on....

What are you dodging with F35 w/o flares?

As far as I know it can dodge a missile by %0.01 luck and it can dodge %90 of missiles that are shot from its front and almost all the missiles that are shot from its front with 15 degree angle.

Question: Why would you shoot the missiles like that?
Answer: You wouldn't.

F35 can dodge water to a certain limit BTW. If you ever tried to hover over sea and accidentally let the jet get in to water you know that it doesn't explode like others.It is 3BAR water-proof.

SO this means its all balanced right?

Other jets can't do the lame strato-run and they explode when they fall in to water immediately.

That makes F-35 pure win.

Last edited by battlejim (2009-01-05 09:53:58)

2009-01-05 18:45:15

#261

SteikeTa: Member; +153|6758|Norway/Norwegen/ Norge/Noruega

battlejim wrote:
SteikeTa wrote:
Actually, the F35B CAN dodge missiles. With and without flares! If you are a better player/pilot, you will take down the J10! You have missiles and mg's.... if you don't like it, don't use that plane. But noooo... now we will get a patch because people have complained a LOT! Don't have to stay over 800 to dogde missiles, it's perfectly capable to do that under that altitude as well.

Hitting the J10 with missiles is no problem either. Don't have to keep the J10s down on the ground (base raping Wake airfield).

Should fix things like squad bug, CTD (maybe that's just this computer, I don't know), getting rid of cheaters... probably wont be able to. They removed the ability to jump and shoot, chuck C4, and so on and so on....
What are you dodging with F35 w/o flares?

As far as I know it can dodge a missile by %0.01 luck and it can dodge %90 of missiles that are shot from its front and almost all the missiles that are shot from its front with 15 degree angle.

Question: Why would you shoot the missiles like that?
Answer: You wouldn't.

F35 can dodge water to a certain limit BTW. If you ever tried to hover over sea and accidentally let the jet get in to water you know that it doesn't explode like others.It is 3BAR water-proof.

SO this means its all balanced right?

Other jets can't do the lame strato-run and they explode when they fall in to water immediately.

That makes F-35 pure win.

Ehm.... ok there Jimmy...

2009-01-05 18:52:59

#262

Laika: Member; +75|5954

We should be careful how much whining we do you know.

DICE might just get fed up and replace all the jets with boats.

They'd say, "How's that for balance, you crybabies?"

2009-01-06 00:25:52

#263

GateKeeper{NL}: Member; +142|6379

Fat_Swinub wrote:
GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
Replace the F-35 with F-18's!

OR..

Decrease the speed of the J-10 @ sea level
Replace jet's missiles with grenade launchers

OR..

Something equally as stupid

lol, troll

2009-01-06 00:36:32

#264

=NHB=Shadow: hi; +322|6376|California

Ataronchronon wrote:
We should be careful how much whining we do you know.

DICE might just get fed up and replace all the jets with boats.

They'd say, "How's that for balance, you crybabies?"

or they can just go fuck you crybabies, BF2 IS GONE.
/online servers are gone

2009-01-06 00:39:10

#265

Cheez: Herman is a warmaphrodite; +1,027|6449|King Of The Islands

=NHB=Shadow wrote:
Ataronchronon wrote:
We should be careful how much whining we do you know.

DICE might just get fed up and replace all the jets with boats.

They'd say, "How's that for balance, you crybabies?"
or they can just go fuck you crybabies, BF2 IS GONE.
/online servers are gone

They'd need to bring out a patch for that.

Of course they could leave everyone at Connecting To Account Server and change the 2 to a ∞ for the lulz.

My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.

2009-01-06 03:44:18

#266

Laika: Member; +75|5954

Haha, don't give them any ideas.

2009-01-11 09:28:48

#267

-=ThC=-ThaShadow: Smoke weed every day...; +18|6563|Made in Holland

https://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/1/11/128761684782411007.jpg

Last edited by -=ThC=-ThaShadow (2009-01-11 09:29:46)

2009-01-13 22:08:41

#268

GuliblGuy: Zulu son, what!?!; +79|6795|Anaheim, CA

http://www.totalgamingnetwork.com/main/ … p?t=184241

Associate Producer for the Battlefield series, Bazajaytee, has posted up some new info on the BF2 v1.50 patch over on the EA forums. Here's what he's been saying over the past few days:
Having staff to cover any major problems after release is always a key part when we release updates so releasing so close to Christmas would have been a risk we probably wouldn't want to have taken.

As for news of when it will release I'll have more information on that in the next week or so as I have to do some investigations on some things as everyone gets back from Christmas vacation.

------------------------------------------

We have one thing left to do on the update and thats to compile and build the installer for the update. So now we are very close to having something. Once we make the installer we'll do some internal testing then open it up to you all.

------------------------------------------

Highway Tampa will be compulsary from 1.50 onwards (as it was optional with 1.41). We are looking to make a full and incremental version of the update. The incremental with be a couple of hundred Mb while the full would be well over 500Mb.

2009-01-13 22:46:26

#269

Wallpaper: ☺; +303|6004|The pool

My flickr

2009-01-14 11:05:37

#270

Fin_jet: Member; +4|5699|Finland

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
Replace the F-35 with F-18's!

OR..

Decrease the speed of the J-10 @ sea level

F-18 sucks more than F-35 ...

2009-01-14 16:49:58

#271

legionair: back to i-life; +336|6633|EU

Can someone update me please which things they are going to include/fix/remove/fuck in a patch? Thx

2009-01-14 17:15:45

#272

Hakei: Banned; +295|6005

Fin_jet wrote:
GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
Replace the F-35 with F-18's!

OR..

Decrease the speed of the J-10 @ sea level
F-18 sucks more than F-35 ...

100% Agree, I think aside from the F15, the F18 is the worst jet in the game.

2009-01-14 22:55:17

#273

N00bkilla55404: Voices are calling...; +136|5941|Somewhere out in Space

Hakei wrote:
Fin_jet wrote:
GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
Replace the F-35 with F-18's!

OR..

Decrease the speed of the J-10 @ sea level
F-18 sucks more than F-35 ...
100% Agree, I think aside from the F15, the F18 is the worst jet in the game.

f18 missile evasion>j10 missile evasion. Even inside turn faggots only get hit one out of every 15 missiles.

2009-01-15 00:13:24

#274

Wallpaper: ☺; +303|6004|The pool

N00bkilla55404 wrote:
Hakei wrote:
Fin_jet wrote:
F-18 sucks more than F-35 ...
100% Agree, I think aside from the F15, the F18 is the worst jet in the game.
f18 missile evasion>j10 missile evasion. Even inside turn faggots only get hit one out of every 15 missiles.

Yarr. Pull up + afterburner and unless you get unlucky as hell with AA on the ground, nothings gonna be hitting you

My flickr

2009-01-15 08:19:36

#275

san4: The Mas; +311|6698|NYC, a place to live

legionair wrote:
Can someone update me please which things they are going to include/fix/remove/fuck in a patch? Thx

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=103689

They're going to give everyone 20 claymores.

Pages: 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 21

Index »
Games »
Battlefield Series »
Battlefield 2 »
BF2 1.50 patch news

Board footer

Jump to

BF2S Forums BF2 1.50 patch news

SteikeTa wrote:

Hakei wrote:

SteikeTa wrote:

SteikeTa wrote:

Hakei wrote:

SteikeTa wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

Fat_Swinub wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

SteikeTa wrote:

battlejim wrote:

SteikeTa wrote:

Fat_Swinub wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

Ataronchronon wrote:

=NHB=Shadow wrote:

Ataronchronon wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

Fin_jet wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

Hakei wrote:

Fin_jet wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

N00bkilla55404 wrote:

Hakei wrote:

Fin_jet wrote:

legionair wrote:

Board footer