Foes warned off 'testing' Obama

2009-01-04 21:32:01

#1

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7020

Barack is ready to Rock from day 1

"Anyone who thought that the upcoming months might present opportunities to test the new administration would be sorely mistaken.

"President Obama and his national security team, myself included, will be ready to defend the interests of the United States and our friends and allies from the moment he takes office on January 20th."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7781123.stm

Love is the answer

2009-01-04 21:33:18

#2

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6833|Global Command

By what? Some bailout money?

2009-01-04 21:39:16

#3

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6709|North Carolina

ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?

lol... let's hope not...

2009-01-04 21:40:15

#4

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6955|USA

Turquoise wrote:
ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?
lol... let's hope not...

yeah, that one cracked me up

2009-01-04 21:44:53

#5

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7020

just hoping he isn't a paper tiger... crosses fingers...
his military guys are good... so that's comforting

Love is the answer

2009-01-04 22:35:37

#6

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6833|Global Command

sigh....Obama will have about as much say over what the military does as I do.

2009-01-05 01:16:40

#7

destruktion_6143: Was ist Loos?; +154|6930|Canada

ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?

nope, thats the Bush admin route of thinking bud. lol repub's doin shit that commies do. cracks me up all the time

2009-01-05 01:46:49

#8

Catbox: forgiveness; +505|7020

destruktion_6143 wrote:
ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?
nope, thats the Bush admin route of thinking bud. lol repub's doin shit that commies do. cracks me up all the time

So Obama is going to put an end to the bailouts... whewww...lol
only 14 more shopping days to blame Bush for every problem in the world... it may be extended though if Obama encounters any difficulties...lol

Love is the answer

2009-01-05 06:44:24

#9

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6925|London, England

ATG wrote:
sigh....Obama will have about as much say over what the military does as I do.

Good, leave shit like that it to the experts. Because when you have idiots who are supposedly "experienced" and thus a better commander like......er, GWB and Cheney running the show, well, no need to explain.

2009-01-05 10:08:35

#10

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|6975|UK

Who else read it as FEOS warned off testing Obama?

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2009-01-05 11:55:43

#11

destruktion_6143: Was ist Loos?; +154|6930|Canada

m3thod wrote:
Who else read it as FEOS warned off testing Obama?

lol just noticed now

2009-01-06 00:57:58

#12

GateKeeper{NL}: Member; +142|6673

ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?

10,000,000,000,000,000,

In Euros plz,

otherwise cease to exist USA.

2009-01-06 03:54:54

#13

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6955|USA

ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?

Neh, he will run to the UN and beg for a resolution.

2009-01-06 04:09:47

#14

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6457|what

lowing wrote:
ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?
Neh, he will run to the UN and beg for a resolution.

Make a difference from the US running to the UN for a veto.

2009-01-06 04:19:55

#15

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6955|USA

TheAussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:
ATG wrote:
By what? Some bailout money?
Neh, he will run to the UN and beg for a resolution.
Make a difference from the US running to the UN for a veto.

Ummmm,one is, the US is stopping UN biaes action, and the other is, Obama will put US national security at the mercy of the UN, maybe??
How'd I do?

2009-01-06 04:37:47

#16

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6457|what

lowing wrote:
Ummmm,one is, the US is stopping UN biaes action, and the other is, Obama will put US national security at the mercy of the UN, maybe??
How'd I do?

Your such a fence sitter. If\When Obama goes to the UN you say he'll beg for a resolution. But when it's the opposite well that's because the UN is just so biased.

2009-01-06 04:45:51

#17

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,817|6410|eXtreme to the maX

Lowing wrote:
Ummmm,one is, the US is stopping UN biaes action

Lowing, thinking the whole of the rest of the world is biased = paranoia, pure and simple.

The world isn't biased, the US is in the wrong.

Fuck Israel

2009-01-06 05:14:12

#18

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6955|USA

TheAussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:
Ummmm,one is, the US is stopping UN biaes action, and the other is, Obama will put US national security at the mercy of the UN, maybe??
How'd I do?
Your such a fence sitter. If\When Obama goes to the UN you say he'll beg for a resolution. But when it's the opposite well that's because the UN is just so biased.

Yeah, I am a fence sitter. Ask anyone

2009-01-06 05:16:05

#19

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6955|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:
Lowing wrote:
Ummmm,one is, the US is stopping UN biaes action
Lowing, thinking the whole of the rest of the world is biased = paranoia, pure and simple.

The world isn't biased, the US is in the wrong.

Sorry ya feel that way, tell ya what, any country that thinks the US is paranoid can step outta line for US handouts and help, in dealing with all of their problems. Any takers?

Last edited by lowing (2009-01-06 14:54:51)

2009-01-06 15:12:52

#20

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,817|6410|eXtreme to the maX

Yes, the whole of the UN apart from Israel.

Fuck Israel

2009-01-06 20:39:28

#21

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6955|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes, the whole of the UN apart from Israel.

I would love nothing more than to have the members of the UN fund themselves and leave the US out of it.

2009-01-06 20:42:31

#22

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6457|what

lowing wrote:
Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes, the whole of the UN apart from Israel.
I would love nothing more than to have the members of the UN fund themselves and leave the US out of it.

So would they.

2009-01-06 20:43:17

#23

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6955|USA

TheAussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:
Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes, the whole of the UN apart from Israel.
I would love nothing more than to have the members of the UN fund themselves and leave the US out of it.
So would they.

Ya think so? Any clues as to why they don't then?

2009-01-07 17:47:24

#24

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6715|'Murka

I swear that when I first saw the thread title it said "Feos warned off 'testing' Obama".

Thought I'd missed a memo somewhere.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2009-01-07 17:48:32

#25

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6715|'Murka

TheAussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:
Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes, the whole of the UN apart from Israel.
I would love nothing more than to have the members of the UN fund themselves and leave the US out of it.
So would they.

Then perhaps they could start.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

BF2S Forums Foes warned off 'testing' Obama

ATG wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

destruktion_6143 wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

lowing wrote:

ATG wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

ATG wrote:

lowing wrote:

Lowing wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Board footer