Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6149|'straya

justice wrote:

TheGiantSE wrote:

They should make the 3 middle flags neutral.
Will be hard for US to get over when playing infantry only.

They will meet a wall of snipers and AT.
I must admit, it looks very tough for the US side on that map.....unless there are blackhawks
Im guessing there would be blackhawks otherwise it would be chinese rape fest 24/7
Spidery_Yoda
Member
+399|6270
Wow it looks like we're getting that PLA Urban map everybody has been asking for for a few years .

They do listen after all. Well done DICE .
Cheez
Herman is a warmaphrodite
+1,027|6439|King Of The Islands

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

justice wrote:

TheGiantSE wrote:

They should make the 3 middle flags neutral.
Will be hard for US to get over when playing infantry only.

They will meet a wall of snipers and AT.
I must admit, it looks very tough for the US side on that map.....unless there are blackhawks
Im guessing there would be blackhawks otherwise it would be chinese rape fest 24/7
Please tell me they've made them not useless then.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
TunaMan
Mouse-Pilot
+29|5784|Israel
Wow, reading that almost made me cum myself

I still think they should adjust the way any AA/GA missles NEVER miss the F35.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6382|the land of bourbon
that new map is going to be a total ERYX-fest against US boats... i cant wait.

steelie [eryx] noob1
steelie [eryx] noob2
steelie [eryx] noob3
steelie [eryx] noob4
steelie [eryx] noob5
steelie [eryx] noob6

oh and

DICE wrote:

Q: What will the BF2 1.5 patch do to prevent cheating?

A: We released some information about the changes we have taken to prevent cheating on Battlefield.com. We have included a new account verification process to make sure the player is who they say they are. Server security and stability changes have been made as well as closing off other cheats based around the Commander assets. We don’t want to give away too much with what we have done to prevent cheating as we don’t want to give the upper hand back to the cheats.
i'm skeptical

Last edited by steelie34 (2008-12-17 06:48:30)

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
Longbow
Member
+163|6647|Odessa, Ukraine
Map looks crappy - distance between flags is too small, a lot of bridges, and wtf with USMC on the other side of the river\bay? It will be total massacre for USMC - first the boats, then nade and clayspam and after that - shitload of bridges.
Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6287|eng
Looks promising, but I was kind of hoping for the PLA Urban Map to be PLA vs MEC.

I shall say no more.
#rekt
JoshP
Banned
+176|5690|Notts, UK

DeathUnlimited wrote:

I am fucking happy about urban map with AK-47.

But I still only want better hitreg.
i agree tbh

and what mint said- PLA v MEC would be... porn
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|6693
Project Reality, AIX, Point of Existence, Operation Peace Keeper, already "fixed BF2".
Tehremos
Parcel of ol' Crams
+128|6408|Somersetshire

Superior Mind wrote:

Project Reality, AIX, Point of Existence, Operation Peace Keeper, already "fixed BF2".
TBH
but, this will make me not play PR for a while, probably till I get bored or too much nade spam pisses me off
JoshP
Banned
+176|5690|Notts, UK

Tehremos wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

Project Reality, AIX, Point of Existence, Operation Peace Keeper, already "fixed BF2".
TBH
but, this will make me not play PR for a while, probably till I get bored or too much nade spam actual gameplay pisses me off
or until you get bored of playing and feel that you have to go back to walk sim



(aix is a win mod, but this "fixing bf2 business" ? no, it's not the same if you do it with a mod tbh, although aix does do well with it's modded version of the vanilla maps)

Last edited by JoshP (2008-12-17 08:03:20)

Fat_Swinub
jaff
+125|6436
They've got the J-10 - F-35 balance wrong. The J-10 isn't overpowered, the F-35 is underpowered. New map looks brilliant though but judging by the overview, won't USMC have to cross by boat exclusively to get a foothold?
-MetaL*
Sup guies
+157|5634|Southern California
Yay
Stubbee
Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts
+223|6744|Reality

TheGiantSE wrote:

They should make the 3 middle flags neutral.
Will be hard for US to get over when playing infantry only.

They will meet a wall of snipers and AT.
QFE!

Terrible IO map
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
Fat_Swinub
jaff
+125|6436
The first infantry only map where going AT is actually good and all you get are complaints.
thepilot91
Member
+64|6237|Åland!
<3<3<<3<3<3 YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAH!!!!!! gimmegimmegimme !
killer21
Because f*ck you that's why.
+400|6591|Reisterstown, MD

Fat_Swinub wrote:

The first infantry only map where going AT is actually good and all you get are complaints.
You act surprised.  I'm not.  You will never make these kids happy.  They will find a way to complain about something.  You give them clays, they say it is used to much.  You give them grenades, they will whine that it is being used too much.  You give them pussy, they will complain that they don't know what they are doing so they complain to someone else about it.  Kids.  Just be happy they decided to even bother to release a patch to...get this....a three year old game.  Stop crying and either play the game or don't.   
Cyrax-Sektor
Official Battlefield fanboy
+240|6149|San Antonio, Texas
Awesomeness. A new patch for 2142 they say? Even more loving for this recent owner of 2142. Looking to be good.
Tehremos
Parcel of ol' Crams
+128|6408|Somersetshire
The new map reminds me of the amount of lols I have on Sharqi IO as US.


Spawn at hotel as AT > Run to water's edge > Proceed to get 6 kills per shot
[pt] KEIOS
srs bsns
+231|6653|pimelteror.de
So for IO you have to pray, that the fog hides your Boat, when you are driving along the red zones... otherwise you´ll be fucked.
0akleaves
Member
+183|6614|Newcastle UK

Fat_Swinub wrote:

They've got the J-10 - F-35 balance wrong. The J-10 isn't overpowered, the F-35 is underpowered. New map looks brilliant though but judging by the overview, won't USMC have to cross by boat exclusively to get a foothold?
is it fuck, the f35 is amazing if you use it right, if done right what has been done it shall be fair.
You have to learn the rules of the game and then you have to play better than anyone else.
Scratch[USA]
Member
+105|6548

Sup3r_Dr4gon wrote:



I think thats the 32p size map. Seems too big for 16, but to small for 64. I reckon 64p size will include the two islands to the south.
Looks like 32.  Lets hope that they even offer a 64 size map.  Unlike Euro Forces.
Fat_Swinub
jaff
+125|6436

0akleaves wrote:

Fat_Swinub wrote:

They've got the J-10 - F-35 balance wrong. The J-10 isn't overpowered, the F-35 is underpowered. New map looks brilliant though but judging by the overview, won't USMC have to cross by boat exclusively to get a foothold?
is it fuck, the f35 is amazing if you use it right, if done right what has been done it shall be fair.
It can't evade missiles without the use of flares or stratoflying unlike every other jet in the game. If it could, then it would be balanced. You can rape with it if you use it right but the sheer difficulty of it compared to other jets makes it unbalanced.
Icleos
Member
+101|6743
I put this together for those who want to see a few screenshots applied to the map:

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/FallenAngelicLeo/bf2_newmap_intel_ii.jpg
(Click to enlarge)

Last edited by Icleos (2008-12-17 10:03:45)

Snake
Missing, Presumed Dead
+1,046|6566|England

Sounds good
Guess I gota wait until '09 before playing BF2 again.

The overview of the map is still in beta...im sure they will make a few flags be neutral during testing.

I laughed at the comment about the fishboxes being "a new addition" (3rd screenshot from the bottom). Songhua and FuShe have them, hell, even  Zatar has them.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard