Shouldn't you be off foundling your sister?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Didn't you vote for Prop 2 in Florida, you Rev. Wright loving bible thumper?DBBrinson1 wrote:
Why does that surprise you? Reverend Wright ring a bell? Clinging to guns and bibles takes on a whole new meaning... Kidding.Kmarion wrote:
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081105/gaymarriage_couple_081106/20081106?hub=World
Wow.
surely the Kalifornia Gestapo will get him soonKmarion wrote:
Shouldn't you be off foundling your sister?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Didn't you vote for Prop 2 in Florida, you Rev. Wright loving bible thumper?DBBrinson1 wrote:
Why does that surprise you? Reverend Wright ring a bell? Clinging to guns and bibles takes on a whole new meaning... Kidding.
fucking firefox.. lies all the time to me.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Not if I keep 'foundling'
I voted for it for a number of reasons, not any of which to what you imply. However if you understood a shred of politics you'd know it won't last. Hospitals can change their policies. And this would affect you only if you are an unpaired.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Didn't you vote for Prop 2 in Florida, you Rev. Wright loving bible thumper?DBBrinson1 wrote:
Why does that surprise you? Reverend Wright ring a bell? Clinging to guns and bibles takes on a whole new meaning... Kidding.Kmarion wrote:
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081105/gaymarriage_couple_081106/20081106?hub=World
Wow.
Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-11-06 19:29:52)
Nothing would surprise me anymore.Kmarion wrote:
I'm waiting for an initiative to ban heterosexual marriage. Heterosexuals have shredded that institution into seven layers of horse dung. Dead beat dads, wife beaters, incest, child abuse, cheating spouses.. take your pick.
slippery slope fallacy, you lose in debate mate.Hakei wrote:
As far as I know in many middle eastern countries it's common for a man to be married to more than one woman, and that's socially accepted there. So it's none of your business.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
It's the definition of a word and the nature of word definitions. I have nothing against gays. But, as long as it is not my business if two straight or gay people want to get married, how is it my business if 3 or more people want to get married? What's the difference there?Hakei wrote:
It isn't any of your business if two gay people want to get married, regardless of what it's been for 'at least one thousand years'. In the last 100 or so years child abuse has been a big issue, before that no one cared. Do we now simply refuse child abuse being bad because it's been around for ' thousands of years'. What's 'right' and 'wrong' is an ever changing thing, it's gay marriage is not going to affect you in any way, shape or form. Find another way to display your reluctance to accept homosexuality isn't wrong.
What's next? Going to suggest a human/animal marriage to prove that it shouldn't be called marriage? Find another hobby other than disputing terminology, marriage is just a proof of deep love for a partner, and it shouldn't be taken any further than that.
Tell me, have you ever been married/engaged?
Was she lost? heh love them spell checkers.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Not if I keep 'foundling'
...DBBrinson1 wrote:
Living in California nothing would surprise me anymore.Kmarion wrote:
I'm waiting for an initiative to ban heterosexual marriage. Heterosexuals have shredded that institution into seven layers of horse dung. Dead beat dads, wife beaters, incest, child abuse, cheating spouses.. take your pick.
It must be rather awkward holding these views in the most liberal, atheistic, and gay state in America. I think you'd fit in a lot better in the rural areas of my state.GraphicArtist J wrote:
You're getting out very different topics. I'm gonna stay in the topic in hand because if i give you my opinion on something that you mentioned it'll escalate into something else that isn't part of this thread.
...
you said:
"I suppose you are going to sterilize lesbians so they can't reproduce..." C'mon man, stop being irrational.
But to sum it up...Same ol Circle. You have your beliefs, I have mine. I can't stay here debating all day as I'm at work and can't really type that much. It's a never ending circle. If I tell you that the red ball is red, you'll say it's black. Though I can agree that we disagree.
doesn't seem to be so liberal if they're still passing laws like thisTurquoise wrote:
It must be rather awkward holding these views in the most liberal, atheistic, and gay state in America. I think you'd fit in a lot better in the rural areas of my state.GraphicArtist J wrote:
You're getting out very different topics. I'm gonna stay in the topic in hand because if i give you my opinion on something that you mentioned it'll escalate into something else that isn't part of this thread.
...
you said:
"I suppose you are going to sterilize lesbians so they can't reproduce..." C'mon man, stop being irrational.
But to sum it up...Same ol Circle. You have your beliefs, I have mine. I can't stay here debating all day as I'm at work and can't really type that much. It's a never ending circle. If I tell you that the red ball is red, you'll say it's black. Though I can agree that we disagree.
extremist anything is something to be avoided. Anything is bad if taken too far (far enough).Hurricane2k9 wrote:
doesn't seem to be so liberal if they're still passing laws like thisTurquoise wrote:
It must be rather awkward holding these views in the most liberal, atheistic, and gay state in America. I think you'd fit in a lot better in the rural areas of my state.GraphicArtist J wrote:
You're getting out very different topics. I'm gonna stay in the topic in hand because if i give you my opinion on something that you mentioned it'll escalate into something else that isn't part of this thread.
...
you said:
"I suppose you are going to sterilize lesbians so they can't reproduce..." C'mon man, stop being irrational.
But to sum it up...Same ol Circle. You have your beliefs, I have mine. I can't stay here debating all day as I'm at work and can't really type that much. It's a never ending circle. If I tell you that the red ball is red, you'll say it's black. Though I can agree that we disagree.
extremist religion is a disease that must be eradicated
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-11-11 11:36:57)
Yup, like that too. I did not draw any lines, or take any sides. ANY form of extremism is bad, whether it be left or right, religious or atheist. Extremism brings us to groups like the several terrorist organizations thoughout the world, to some militia movements here in the US, to activist groups that are willing to 'bend' the law to get their voice heard, to the radical polarization of US politics, which shows no signs of moderation.GraphicArtist J wrote:
Extremism Like this?:
http://gatorgop.blogspot.com/2008/11/cr … no-on.html
...
Watch at 2:30... sad really.
'love thy brother... unless he loves you'KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
We are compassionate, tolerant, loving Christians...unless you're gay.
How would you react if the government banned heterosexual marriage?GraphicArtist J wrote:
Extremism Like this?:
http://gatorgop.blogspot.com/2008/11/cr … no-on.html
...
Watch at 2:30... sad really.
Good points... I think California has now earned the title of dysfunctional.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
doesn't seem to be so liberal if they're still passing laws like thisTurquoise wrote:
It must be rather awkward holding these views in the most liberal, atheistic, and gay state in America. I think you'd fit in a lot better in the rural areas of my state.GraphicArtist J wrote:
You're getting out very different topics. I'm gonna stay in the topic in hand because if i give you my opinion on something that you mentioned it'll escalate into something else that isn't part of this thread.
...
you said:
"I suppose you are going to sterilize lesbians so they can't reproduce..." C'mon man, stop being irrational.
But to sum it up...Same ol Circle. You have your beliefs, I have mine. I can't stay here debating all day as I'm at work and can't really type that much. It's a never ending circle. If I tell you that the red ball is red, you'll say it's black. Though I can agree that we disagree.
extremist religion is a disease that must be eradicated
So we must vote to promote a lifestyle which contradicts our values in order to prove we are loving ... riiiiiight.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
We are compassionate, tolerant, loving Christians...unless you're gay.
How are you promoting the lifestyle? I didn't see a ballot setting a "gay day" or requiring you to promote a lifestyle which contradicts your values. I am unaware how (for instance) Prop 8 promotes a homosexual lifestyle. Instead we are voting to promote your (or religious-specific) values over all.Stingray24 wrote:
So we must vote to promote a lifestyle which contradicts our values in order to prove we are loving ... riiiiiight.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
We are compassionate, tolerant, loving Christians...unless you're gay.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-11-11 15:56:28)
By that same logic, atheists should vote to ban churches. I may not like Christianity, but I'm not going to keep you from worshipping whoever you want to.Stingray24 wrote:
So we must vote to promote a lifestyle which contradicts our values in order to prove we are loving ... riiiiiight.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
We are compassionate, tolerant, loving Christians...unless you're gay.
Yes, intolerant to gay people marrying, or more specifically intolerant to the use of the word marriage by same-sex couples.Stingray24 wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your statement was against Christians voting for prop 8 ... as intolerant and unloving.