No.Miggle wrote:
But don't these people already have ways to get out of this city?
Yes, but only because the hospital is there specifically to help them.Miggle wrote:
won't the hospital send it's patients to another hospital?
lol.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
lowing, FM, et al, would just have them burn in their beds.
Last edited by Miggle (2008-10-07 16:49:45)
oh yes, especially on toast with a little bit of mint jelly.Miggle wrote:
lol.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
lowing, FM, et al, would just have them burn in their beds.
Conservatives, they like burning cripples.
Why do you think that the people who qualified for non-sub-prime loans signed loan papers for sub-prime loans with option ARMS? You think they weren't paying attention or something? They did it, knowing the risk they were incurring. That risk came home to roost and they paid for it.ATG wrote:
Why is it that 20% of people that qualified for non sub-prime loans were given sub-prime loans with option arms?
It is because that was all that was being written.
I like how conservative are saying something to the effect ;
" you should have known that under republican deregulation you should have known the banks were going to fuck you and just kept renting."
Yeah...like those who chose to go with ARMs when they could've easily gone with a locked-in rate.ATG wrote:
There were some homeowners that never should have bought. I know some.
No, no burning them; then they are too crunchy. I like mine a bit chewy, with the center a bit undercooked.Miggle wrote:
lol.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
lowing, FM, et al, would just have them burn in their beds.
Conservatives, they like burning cripples.
jesus. Are you kidding me with this postATG wrote:
gg Bush.
See? This is how those bastards tag team us.
Bush, pretending to be a fiscal conservative lead us into a socialist state of our financial affairs. He gave the presidency massive new powers after 9-11. Those do not expire when he leaves office.
And, finally, he has made such a disaster of the republican party that Obama will be catapulted into office in a Reaganesqe landslide and moreso;
he will have a mandate
The backlash against the republicans will also cost them seats in the house and senate and give Obama as many as 3-4 supreme court judges.
I go on record here; Obama the "uber-liberal" will use the " bush recession " to usher in a new and as yet unimagined police state and world events will make him the war time president of war time presidents.
pin-yin:shi shi zao ying xiong
http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2008 … 545905.jpg
regardless, what good is a filibuster anyways. just annoying.Kmarion wrote:
A supermajority is virtually filibuster proof.
It's fairly balanced right now: 4 lefties, 4 righties, and 1 middle-of-the-roader.God Save the Queen wrote:
4 justices? lol
2, if that. keep it balanced. as it is, the court is looking to be conservative.
Sometimes slick salesmen take advantage of dim people.Why do you think that the people who qualified for non-sub-prime loans signed loan papers for sub-prime loans with option ARMS? You think they weren't paying attention or something? They did it, knowing the risk they were incurring. That risk came home to roost and they paid for it.
Which one do you suppose gave the salesman the bigger bonus?Yeah...like those who chose to go with ARMs when they could've easily gone with a locked-in rate.
And? No one ever said the mortgage lenders didn't shoulder some of the blame as well. But then again, I guess we can't have personal accountability. It wounds inner children and stuff.Dilbert_X wrote:
Sometimes slick salesmen take advantage of dim people.Why do you think that the people who qualified for non-sub-prime loans signed loan papers for sub-prime loans with option ARMS? You think they weren't paying attention or something? They did it, knowing the risk they were incurring. That risk came home to roost and they paid for it.
Some regulation in some sectors of the market? Absolutely.Dilbert_X wrote:
Which one do you suppose gave the salesman the bigger bonus?Yeah...like those who chose to go with ARMs when they could've easily gone with a locked-in rate.
Banks need to be regulated, and dim people shouldn't sign stuff.
