You're telling me if I question Obamas policies or religion out there, I could be arrested? He has a legal team watching what republican ads get on tv?
Last edited by SealXo (2008-09-28 09:53:49)
You're telling me if I question Obamas policies or religion out there, I could be arrested? He has a legal team watching what republican ads get on tv?
Calling out false campaign claims--good
Having the "squad" loyal to ONE SIDE--bad
Having the "squad" loyal to ONE SIDE--bad
Don't see a problem with pointing out false claims and lies. Lots of people during every election could be sued for slander.
This is a hint of what a Obama admin will look like.
This is outrageous.
God help America.
This is outrageous.
God help America.
Obama is an inexperienced black militant elitist muslim who is also part of the "good old boy" network, responsible for the economy collapsing and now he's a fascist. yeah, he's a terrorist too.
Last edited by God Save the Queen (2008-09-28 12:43:03)
Im glad you trigs are from california where your mccain vote is as valuable as a donkey fart
Remember the stories of people that got arrested for wearing anti-Bush/anti-war shirts?
People are idiots.
What's a trig?
People are idiots.
What's a trig?
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-09-28 12:47:41)
police states are OK as long as they uphold white protestant values.
I'm kind of WASPy. Actually a bastardized version I guess.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-09-28 12:55:40)
my republican mother told me that friday's debate comepletely turned her away from mccain.
My dad still can't make himself say "I'm gonna vote for the black feller"...but he will anyways. This weekend was a break-through, after the debate he affectionately referred to Obama as "Buckwheat" and that he's voting Democrat this year. I think that's about as close as we're gonna get to him admitting he'll vote for a black guy. My step-mom really wants to like "Calamity Jane", but she's still sore after she put in about 2 weeks volunteer work for Ron Paul.God Save the Queen wrote:
my republican mother told me that friday's debate comepletely turned her away from mccain.
My grandma on that side is brain-addled and still stuck in the 1920's Eugenics Movement, no hope for her...she lead a protest in her retirement community about 3 years ago to ban one of those black jockey boy lawn ornaments from someone's front lawn. Hilarious to hear her rant about it..."They could have just painted the face white, but nooooo..." I think we'll need to make sure her will is updated around election time, something tells me she'll be tits up by Jan. 20 if Obama wins.
Hang on... am I mistaken or is Obama just asking for existing law to be enforced as regards false claims and defamation? No?
That would be fine, I guess he can sit next to everyone else in jail then huh?Braddock wrote:
Hang on... am I mistaken or is Obama just asking for existing law to be enforced as regards false claims and defamation? No?
So it would be Obama's Truth?
I can see it now a Truth committee in Washington deciding what you should and shouldn't believe.
I can see it now a Truth committee in Washington deciding what you should and shouldn't believe.
This Gov. seems pretty bent out of shape;Braddock wrote:
Hang on... am I mistaken or is Obama just asking for existing law to be enforced as regards false claims and defamation? No?
http://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/ … ?id=EkkkVF“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”
Obama has financial blood on his hands. See Kmans thread.
So that is all he is asking for, yes?lowing wrote:
That would be fine, I guess he can sit next to everyone else in jail then huh?Braddock wrote:
Hang on... am I mistaken or is Obama just asking for existing law to be enforced as regards false claims and defamation? No?
He's not asking for the law to be changed to accommodate him or to erode the existing constitution in any way?
Well from what I can gather it would just be stories that are based in fact and not on false or slanderous tales.SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:
So it would be Obama's Truth?
I can see it now a Truth committee in Washington deciding what you should and shouldn't believe.
Why have these laws in the first place if so many people seem to dislike them so much? If you are so disgusted by these laws then you should be campaigning to get them repealed not giving out because someone is seeking to have them enforced.
Yeah I could do all that or just vote for McCain.Braddock wrote:
Well from what I can gather it would just be stories that are based in fact and not on false or slanderous tales.SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:
So it would be Obama's Truth?
I can see it now a Truth committee in Washington deciding what you should and shouldn't believe.
Why have these laws in the first place if so many people seem to dislike them so much? If you are so disgusted by these laws then you should be campaigning to get them repealed not giving out because someone is seeking to have them enforced.
Dont leave your day job mate.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Guess it's fine to take legal action against an ad that may be spreading lies about him, but people? That's a bit far fetched no?
Not to mention the name... Truth squad ffs?
Not to mention the name... Truth squad ffs?
ƒ³
half of the obama commercials are falsities or just taking advantage of peoples ignorance. for example, "john mccain votes with GWB 90% of the time" is true, but is just taking advantage of peoples ignorance, because 90% of senate votes are unanimous bullshit votes such as commemerating harriet tubman and teh gators for winning the tostitos bowl.oug wrote:
Guess it's fine to take legal action against an ad that may be spreading lies about him, but people? That's a bit far fetched no?
Not to mention the name... Truth squad ffs?
The key to those statistics would be what he actually doesn't side with Bush on...what does he go against the bulk of his party on?SealXo wrote:
half of the obama commercials are falsities or just taking advantage of peoples ignorance. for example, "john mccain votes with GWB 90% of the time" is true, but is just taking advantage of peoples ignorance, because 90% of senate votes are unanimous bullshit votes such as commemerating harriet tubman and teh gators for winning the tostitos bowl.oug wrote:
Guess it's fine to take legal action against an ad that may be spreading lies about him, but people? That's a bit far fetched no?
Not to mention the name... Truth squad ffs?
Does Obama even come close to not toeing the party line?
The answer is a resounding NO.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Is McCain promising to repeal these laws if he gets into office?SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:
Yeah I could do all that or just vote for McCain.Braddock wrote:
Well from what I can gather it would just be stories that are based in fact and not on false or slanderous tales.SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:
So it would be Obama's Truth?
I can see it now a Truth committee in Washington deciding what you should and shouldn't believe.
Why have these laws in the first place if so many people seem to dislike them so much? If you are so disgusted by these laws then you should be campaigning to get them repealed not giving out because someone is seeking to have them enforced.
Riiiiiiiiiiight.Sgt._Eraser74 wrote:
This is my impression of what Obama will end up being.
Last edited by Braddock (2008-09-30 05:29:31)