BF2s SuperPI scores v2

2008-08-05 12:42:36

#26

Brasso: member; +1,549|6844

The_Sniper_NM wrote:
cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
ghettoperson wrote:
http://xs230.xs.to/xs230/08322/superpi407.jpg

And it's still slow. Fucking Vista(esque operating systems).
Vista slows down PI score a lot.
Lol I ran mine on Ultimate x64. I should probably find a copy of XP and strip it down and run.

So did I...

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-08-05 13:08:14

#27

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6411|Winland

https://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/Freezer7Pro/SPI431-1.png

Suicide run.

Was hoping to beat 12s, but my temps are holding me back.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-05 13:40:02

#28

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6863

How much VCore and VDimm did you actually have going through there?

2008-08-05 15:44:04

#29

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6411|Winland

ghettoperson wrote:
How much VCore and VDimm did you actually have going through there?

Fuck, I forgot to put one CPU-Z to Memory. Shit.

I had VCore set to 1.6(!) in BIOS, and VDimm set to 2.3(!!). Timings 3-4-3-7.

My Vdrop/droop is horrible

I could go even higher, if it weren't for my fucking IHS. With my CPU lapped, and contact checked with many different techniques, I still get 70(!!!)C IDLE(!!!!) with that VCore. It's just not making contact on the inside.

I think I'm gonna sell off this CPU and get an E7300.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-08-05 15:46:07)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-05 15:52:13

#30

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6863

Damn, I might have to get some suicide runs going, see if I can get 4Ghz. It's not stable at 3.8, but it has a lot less volts. I won't be going for 1.6v though...

2008-08-05 15:55:05

#31

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6411|Winland

ghettoperson wrote:
Damn, I might have to get some suicide runs going, see if I can get 4Ghz. It's not stable at 3.8, but it has a lot less volts. I won't be going for 1.6v though...

1.6 is nothing for a 65nm.

Also, I'll add you as soon as I've moved my screen back from watching a movie. Can't add people without my macros for re-numbering.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-06 04:47:49

#32

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6930

Sorry freezer, but my new OC rapes.

https://img181.imageshack.us/img181/7291/superpidj2.jpg

https://img181.imageshack.us/img181/7291/superpidj2.bf7141d507.jpg

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2008-08-06 05:17:42

#33

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6411|Winland

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Sorry freezer, but my new OC rapes.

http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/7291/superpidj2.jpg
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/7291 … 41d507.jpg

4.313 > 4.27

It's .Sup who's sorry, as you just stole his place

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-06 05:22:17

#34

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6930

Freezer7Pro wrote:
cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Sorry freezer, but my new OC rapes.

http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/7291/superpidj2.jpg
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/7291 … 41d507.jpg
4.313 > 4.27

It's .Sup who's sorry, as you just stole his place

Kekeke I can go higher but no time for suicide run

2008-08-06 10:21:10

#35

The_Sniper_NM: Official EVGA Fanboy; +94|6327|SC | USA |

Ugh There goes my chances. Oh well. Like .6 of a second really matters. XD

E8500 > E8400 considering I don't have an X48.

2008-08-06 16:47:36

#36

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6920|67.222.138.85

I didn't see anyone actually involved getting seriously pissed on this thread, it looked like a joke. In any case some people were taking it the wrong way and it was off topic, so I cleaned it up.

2008-08-06 17:32:01

#37

tkoi: Utahraptor!; +148|6361|Texas

Argh, was so close to stealing 3rd

https://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h164/4pas/spi29922.png

2008-08-06 17:42:23

#38

aimless: Member; +166|6338|Texas

How come Intels are so much faster than AMD processors?

2008-08-06 19:13:21

#39

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6537|New Haven, CT

Super Pi favors Intel architecture.

2008-08-06 19:20:31

#40

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6736|...

nukchebi0 wrote:
Super Pi favors Intel architecture.

How? I assumed it used a basic command set.

Last edited by jsnipy (2008-08-06 19:20:50)

2008-08-06 19:22:34

#41

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6537|New Haven, CT

jsnipy wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Super Pi favors Intel architecture.
How? I assumed it used a basic command set.

I don't know specifics.

But you can see certain programs favor the architecture of certain chips - such as the Radeon 2900s in 3DMark06.

2008-08-06 22:21:04

#42

Naturn: Deeds, not words.; +311|6819|Greenwood, IN

https://www.digital-sickness.net/Uploader/files/1/bf2spi_8-7-08.jpg

Eat it! Squeezed extra out of my CPU!

2008-08-06 22:38:30

#43

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6930

nukchebi0 wrote:
jsnipy wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
Super Pi favors Intel architecture.
How? I assumed it used a basic command set.
I don't know specifics.

But you can see certain programs favor the architecture of certain chips - such as the Radeon 2900s in 3DMark06.

Are you high? Intel chips right now are a shitload faster then AMD's, even clock for clock.

2008-08-07 02:15:51

#44

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6537|New Haven, CT

An E6600 and FX-62 have equal performance in the 3DMark06 CPU test.

The FX-62 is 5% weaker in Supreme Commander. (38 FPS vs. 40)

Yet, in Super Pi, the FX-62 takes 50% more time to finish the run than the E6600. Look at the chart in the first post, if you want proof. There is a stock E6600 and FX-62. It seems to me Super Pi favors Intel architecture, considering the other two numbers were from benchmarks that are mostly neutral.

I'm not high at all. I'm just looking at the facts.

2008-08-07 02:22:10

#45

Naturn: Deeds, not words.; +311|6819|Greenwood, IN

So basically in the end you can't compare Intel and AMD with Super PI but..... You can compare other Intel's to each other and the same goes with AMD.

2008-08-07 02:37:16

#46

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6781|NYC / Hamburg

Super Pi mainly uses the CPU floating point unit (x87 instruction set). The FPU in the Core2 is greatly superior to that in the AMD CPUs. Therefore the Core2 rapes AMD at Super Pi

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2008-08-07 03:17:57

#47

Brasso: member; +1,549|6844

max wrote:
Super Pi mainly uses the CPU floating point unit (x87 instruction set). The FPU in the Core2 is greatly superior to that in the AMD CPUs. Therefore the Core2 rapes AMD at Super Pi

well there you have it. the man has spoken.

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-08-07 10:49:31

#48

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6667|The Twilight Zone

https://shrani.si/f/2y/w6/2wVGlP4C/sppi.png

Vcore looks sexy too don't it

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-08-07 10:53:57

#49

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6930

.Sup wrote:
http://shrani.si/f/2y/w6/2wVGlP4C/sppi.png

Vcore looks sexy too don't it

lol hax?

2008-08-07 11:00:09

#50

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6667|The Twilight Zone

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
.Sup wrote:
http://shrani.si/f/2y/w6/2wVGlP4C/sppi.png

Vcore looks sexy too don't it
lol hax?

Theres a lot more to it than just changing frequency and vcore. If you do it right then you don't even need to raise vcore that much.

BF2S Forums BF2s SuperPI scores v2

The_Sniper_NM wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

max wrote:

.Sup wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Board footer