Call of Duty 5 World at War Trailer Released!!!!!!!!

2008-06-23 13:03:25

#1

cport1: Member; +1|6106

http://www.leettube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=b804390e8da280b4cf06&page=1&viewtype=&category=

Doesn't look all that bad... not sure if like WW2 all that much though... i guess its using the cod4 engine

2008-06-23 13:09:58

#2

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6675|cuntshitlake

I came.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-06-23 13:14:00

#3

(T)eflon(S)hadow: R.I.P. Neda; +456|7041|Grapevine, TX

Yes I like the looks of it two...
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=103660

2008-06-23 14:31:58

#4

Backupwayback: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯; +73|6512

looks terrible

2008-06-23 14:34:45

#5

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6857

not soo impressive the current one looks better

2008-06-23 16:41:54

#6

Stimey: +786|6332|Ontario | Canada

needs more Infinity Ward

2008-06-23 16:46:55

#7

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6951|Toronto | Canada

I wanna be a tree-climbing samurai

2008-06-23 17:49:37

#8

CrazeD: Member; +368|6885|Maine

MOH:PA what?

Failure is imminent.

2008-06-23 20:04:46

#9

ReTox: Member; +100|6711|State of RETOXification

Sooooo.... back to WW2 then I guess.

2008-06-23 20:55:14

#10

specialistx2324: hahahahahhaa; +244|6901|arica harbour

ill pass on this game. cant go back to WW2. sad that infinity ward is not doing it. real pathetic and cheap if you ask me.

2008-06-24 05:35:34

#11

eaglecorps: shotguns; +23|6456|TEXAS

^^ this man speaks trUf

2008-06-24 12:55:37

#12

l41e: Member; +677|6860

So, it's back to Treyarch and World War II again. Whoop-de-doo. If CoD3 is anything to go by I'll be passing this one up.

2008-06-24 13:08:16

#13

fadedsteve: GOP Sympathizer; +266|6703|Menlo Park, CA

Looks pretty broke to me. . . .

How about an expansion to COD 4!!! Fuck WWII shooters! They are so plaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayed

2008-06-27 23:51:02

#14

Cyberwolf2006: Member; +1|6781

Backupwayback wrote:
looks terrible

I agree however mainly because I despise WWII / WWI style games.

2008-06-27 23:52:40

#15

Eagle: Togs8896 is my evil alter ego; +567|6843|New Hampshire, USA

Backupwayback wrote:
looks incredible

I agree

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/14407/Sig_Pats.jpg

2008-06-28 00:07:34

#16

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6368|Vancouver | Canada

What an original theme.

2008-06-28 00:21:50

#17

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6365|what

DefCon-17 wrote:
What an original theme.

you would rather crysis?

2008-06-28 05:26:56

#18

dtacs: say that 2 my face fucker not online; +126|6047|Australia

when i saw the trailers for wic, cod4 and mirrors edge, or any good game i usually shiver at the sheer epicness (like eve) but this just didn't do it. it looks nothing new or amazing, just some american and japanese soldiers backstabbing eachother with katanas in the jungle

wait how isn't that awesome

2008-06-28 06:00:08

#19

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6603

COD 4 looks better. I don't know how that happened.

2008-06-28 23:04:47

#20

Spearhead: Gulf coast redneck hippy; +731|6902|Tampa Bay Florida

Cant believe how quick some people are to declare a game bad, especially months before its even out.

WW2 games are awesome and CoD should've done a pacific game long ago. If you think WW2 games are old then why are you even posting in this thread?

2008-06-29 01:16:51

#21

Johnny_Extremer: I Am McLovin!!!!; +22|6473

specialistx2324 wrote:
ill pass on this game. cant go back to WW2. sad that infinity ward is not doing it. real pathetic and cheap if you ask me.

Kryteck or whatever bought the rights to COD5 when COD4 was in develpment so it's not really cheap it's buisiness.

2008-06-29 17:20:50

#22

HSG: Member; +23|6686|British Columbia, Canada

Winston_Churchill wrote:
I wanna be a tree-climbing samurai

2008-06-29 17:21:58

#23

HSG: Member; +23|6686|British Columbia, Canada

Spearhead wrote:
Cant believe how quick some people are to declare a game bad, especially months before its even out.

WW2 games are awesome and CoD should've done a pacific game long ago. If you think WW2 games are old then why are you even posting in this thread?

2008-06-29 18:49:05

#24

GodFather: Blademaster's bottom bitch; +387|6432|Phoenix, AZ

Now... WW2 with the Crytek (is it Crytek 2?) engine would be BAD ASS. so would Vietnam with that engine, with the whole free roam style of play instead of that linear point a to point b bullshit we all know and hate.

2008-06-29 18:58:58

#25

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6365|what

GodFather wrote:
Now... WW2 with the Crytek (is it Crytek 2?) engine would be BAD ASS. so would Vietnam with that engine,

If they had done that from the start, people would still be playing crysis that stopped ages ago.

BF2S Forums Call of Duty 5 World at War Trailer Released!!!!!!!!

Backupwayback wrote:

Backupwayback wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

specialistx2324 wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

GodFather wrote:

Board footer