Turquoise wrote:
Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Turquoise wrote:
With all the accusations flying around of the media being liberal, broadcasters are on the defensive about liberal bias, but conservative bias generally flies under the radar or is accepted without much protest.
For example, can you really state that the media is liberally biased after the fiasco that was the Monica Lewinsky affair? .
The Very fact that you and others refer to this as " the Monica Lewinsky affair " is testament to the effect of a left bias.
It was actually
" The Paula Jones Slander Lawsuit " Monica Lewinsky was just going to be a witness against Bill Clinton for Slander, He Perjured himself, got away with it. The Media gave him a Pass and always had the people with double digit IQs thinking
" it was about consensual sex " It was about Perjury.
Keep in mind even that was on Taxpayers Time in Our Public offices. Can you imagine if some bureaucrat was caught phukin his subordinate in the office of New York City Public Housing ? the clintons would have been the 1st to sign off on his hanging.
After all, it turns out it wasn't a
" Huge Right Wing Conspiracy " was it ?
Speaking of tax money, you don't seem to protest the use of billions in tax payer money to fund the investigation that everyone already knew the answer to..
I wasn't speaking of Tax money. and clinton was the one who wasted taxpayers money by
slandering Paula Jones and refusing to tell the truth after he had been cornered, instead he
suborned a potential damaging witness to his flaw of character. In fact his entire campaign was based on a lies.
Turquoise wrote:
The point is this. Clinton was full of shit for lying under oath and cheating on his wife..
Not the point at all, We didn't care what he did with hillary, we ( anyone with a brain ) knew that his happy marriage was a campaign sham as was his
free health care ! he promised ( though it seems some suckers will still fall for that one.) he perjured and suborned a witness and miss-used his office strong arm Paula Jones because she mentioned she had dated him and he didn't like it.
Turquoise wrote:
The Republicans were full of shit for spending so much time and taxpayer money on the investigation..
Wrong again. bill clinton spent the money by lying
( and here we go again )in what was
" The Paula Jones Slander Lawsuit " Monica Lewinsky was just going to be a witness against Bill Clinton for Slander, starting to sink in ?
Turquoise wrote:
Don't mistake my argument as any reverence for Clinton. .
I see no argument and no one has Reverence for clinton. I cant even bring myself to capitalize his name if you noticed and I never have.
Turquoise wrote:
I think he was worlds better than Bush,.
your delusion, He had the Reagan Tax plan un-altered, less 1/3 of our National expenses ( the Cold war had ended ) after a slight bump in the economy with all the defense industries and their employees taking a huge hit, the economy was fine under George H. Bush. the media blew it out of proportion, added the " Homeless Crisis " and propped up Ross Perot twice to get clinton in with a minority vote. Also decimated under clinton was our intelligence services, he also ignored 9 terror attacks in 8 years cumulating in 911
Turquoise wrote:
but that's kind of like saying, "I'd rather have someone who can read in office than the biggest idiot I could find." After Bush, our standards were so lowered that any of the current candidates would be an improvement.
History will be his judge not bleating herds of sheep.
Turquoise wrote:
Clinton helped continue the decline of expectations before Bush even slithered into office though..
Bush was elected fairly Twice, sorry
Turquoise wrote:
It's not a right wing conspiracy, it's a corporate toilet of lobbyism that drags us to the abyss of what we now know of as American politics.
Lobbyist give voice to the people. the N.R.A. does my bidding with my blessing. You can spend all the money you want, everyone gets one vote. The media is biased.
