I don't get why this gets to stay open for 5 pages, but the mods totally freak out when we try to have a normal debate on weather a plane would take off on a treadmill...
Poll
100 seals vs 100 sas. who would win?
seals | 51% | 51% - 58 | ||||
sas | 48% | 48% - 54 | ||||
Total: 112 |
Or when I tried to finally solve the cookie mystery after two years...Dauntless wrote:
I don't get why this gets to stay open for 5 pages, but the mods totally freak out when we try to have a normal debate on weather a plane would take off on a treadmill...
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
That got to like 30 pages...Dauntless wrote:
I don't get why this gets to stay open for 5 pages, but the mods totally freak out when we try to have a normal debate on weather a plane would take off on a treadmill...
I say both are good, but some way SAS is more popular and did more in history. Remember WW ? Yeah they did some stuff.
rofljord wrote:
Bf2 SF was a fun game wasn't it?eaglecorps wrote:
SAS would run home crying to mommy Seals would pwn for sure SCAR-H > G36K
big flaming homosexual...LaidBackNinja wrote:
I can confirm this.dayarath wrote:
you wore pink allstars^*AlphA*^ wrote:
damn you guys post too fast...
and NO I am not GAY!
it is just, we will never get this thing reasonable discussed... Brits > SAS, Americans > Marines
and I don't know jack shit about both, just that SAS are British special forces...
we Dutch got Commandos too you know but that's not the point, very few, close to zero have experience with these too so it's, throwing with Internet meatballs here rather then bringing facts which we will never bring .
I know.
This is true.^*AlphA*^ wrote:
big flaming homosexual...LaidBackNinja wrote:
I can confirm this.dayarath wrote:
you wore pink allstars
I know.
Didn't you watch Mythbusters last night?Dauntless wrote:
I don't get why this gets to stay open for 5 pages, but the mods totally freak out when we try to have a normal debate on weather a plane would take off on a treadmill...
Can I hase it be close tiem nao?
the television?02fxnmaurer wrote:
i dont even care....anymore lol ...
special forces are what they are...theyre all good tacticians...but i'd know who i'd be relying on in a hostage situation for example
Would you like some fail sauce with this thread?
my poll was closed..
why not this one
why not this one
null vote
But about that plane and the treadmill:
I think people just don't agree on what the situation was in the first place. This is because the problem was stated WRONGLY.
The treadmill doesn't move to match the speed of the plane (it CAN'T. The plane can move independently of the treadmill as the wheels spin freely), but rather the plane adjusts its throttle to stay stationary on the treadmill.
If the pilot only sets minimal thrust, enough to keep the wheels spinning and the plane in the same position, then of course it will not take off. If the pilot wants to take off, however, he CAN. He can take off no matter the speed of the treadmill.
So the question becomes:
Does the pilot WANT to take off?
If he does, he can.
If he does not, he will (probably) not.
Therefore the question is wrong.
If the question is "If the treadmill matches the speed of the aircraft, CAN it take off if the pilot wants to?" -YES
"If the treadmill matches the speed of the aircraft, and the pilot does not turn on the engines, will the plane magically take off by itself?" -NO
I think people just don't agree on what the situation was in the first place. This is because the problem was stated WRONGLY.
The treadmill doesn't move to match the speed of the plane (it CAN'T. The plane can move independently of the treadmill as the wheels spin freely), but rather the plane adjusts its throttle to stay stationary on the treadmill.
If the pilot only sets minimal thrust, enough to keep the wheels spinning and the plane in the same position, then of course it will not take off. If the pilot wants to take off, however, he CAN. He can take off no matter the speed of the treadmill.
So the question becomes:
Does the pilot WANT to take off?
If he does, he can.
If he does not, he will (probably) not.
Therefore the question is wrong.
If the question is "If the treadmill matches the speed of the aircraft, CAN it take off if the pilot wants to?" -YES
"If the treadmill matches the speed of the aircraft, and the pilot does not turn on the engines, will the plane magically take off by itself?" -NO
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
I would win; I'd go Tier 2 Assault then unplug their routers for a second and throw flashbangs everywhere.
KSP Kasak Special Force ftw.
Army of Boratts
Army of Boratts
Depends if the SAS have clubs and the seals are babies.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-03-17 18:06:26)
Green Berets
Well I think Super-super Man would be Superman at least.
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
your blindGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Green Berets
gfto and get glases
I haven't read the past six pages, so forgive me if this is repeated but...
the SAS has the G36E.
the SAS has the G36E.
Yes.M.O.A.B wrote:
...which could well include hostage rescue.
I trained with a couple seals in cqc, room entries, and various hostage situations. Was about the coolest training I have ever had.
This of course means I know next to nothing about what else they do, or how proficient they are overall, but I sure learned a lot from them.
SEALS > SAS
SAS > SEALS
Who cares...they would kick all of our butts, and yes that means all you retired out of shape grunts out there.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
NO! it should be renamed to SAS are better than navy seals? YES or YESLaidBackNinja wrote:
Should be renamed to "Are you from the UK or the US?"
you wouldnt find 100 seals in the same place at one time, or sas