lol they all live/work in Africa. Slave labour tbhThe Sheriff wrote:
Their workforce is leet.Zimmer wrote:
Tesco ( largest supermarket in the UK ).
Careful, next thing you know you'll be one of those Lesbians and don't say I didnt warn you.RoosterCantrell wrote:
I just don't see the point in clothes OTHER than comfort.
Only kidding, I'm the same, perhaps its because we both got a Mrs?
If I go out with her, mate family, all of them whoever, I can't wait to get in and take my jeans or trousers off and stick some shorts on. They make my legs tired.
carhartt double knee duck pants, black.
true religions or gstar
What's wrong with jeans? Or do you prefer clown suits... you clown porn fanatic you.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Unless you work in a mine, blue jeans represent the downfall of Western civilization. I hate them with a smoldering passion.
@Zimmer, yes I agree. I'll pay over $100 for a suit, a nice jacket, or nice dress shoes. Otherwise, I keep it reasonable. I mean shit I've seen t-shirts that cost $100. They probably only cost $1 to make. Some might say that me paying $50 for a game is silly as well, but games these days can take millions in development.
My $15 polo from Gap looks great and feels great. I doubt a $70 one from Armani would be much better.
@Bennis, I hope those pants don't actually have that red stripe :S
Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-03-14 18:50:21)
They represent so many aspects of what is wrong with society. Materialism, consumerism, lack of perspective when it comes to needs, all to the highest degree. The product in many cases intentionally comes defective. What. the. hell. Now kudos to the companies that can market this crap and make millions off of it, really it's impressive, but the fact they make millions on this stuff is absurd. Jeans have lived well past their usefulness in our everyday society, and have become nothing more than a personal statement that costs more than $50.HurricaИe wrote:
What's wrong with jeans? Or do you prefer clown suits... you clown porn fanatic you.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Unless you work in a mine, blue jeans represent the downfall of Western civilization. I hate them with a smoldering passion.
I could deal with some degree of excessiveness, but even the product in its pure, efficient form is flawed. Jeans themselves are an obsolete product that takes forever to dry when wet, lets the wind through comparatively a lot more, and when in the typical suburban/urban form are not the tough product that they once were, they've been softened to make them comfortable. There is no reason, unless as I said you work in a mine, what jeans were first invented for, that jeans should still be being used over other, more practical fabrics.
You want a way to tax the rich and not the poor? Tax fashion items over $100. The government would make billions.
lol wutFlaming_Maniac wrote:
They represent so many aspects of what is wrong with society. Materialism, consumerism, lack of perspective when it comes to needs, all to the highest degree. The product in many cases intentionally comes defective. What. the. hell. Now kudos to the companies that can market this crap and make millions off of it, really it's impressive, but the fact they make millions on this stuff is absurd. Jeans have lived well past their usefulness in our everyday society, and have become nothing more than a personal statement that costs more than $50.HurricaИe wrote:
What's wrong with jeans? Or do you prefer clown suits... you clown porn fanatic you.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Unless you work in a mine, blue jeans represent the downfall of Western civilization. I hate them with a smoldering passion.
I could deal with some degree of excessiveness, but even the product in its pure, efficient form is flawed. Jeans themselves are an obsolete product that takes forever to dry when wet, lets the wind through comparatively a lot more, and when in the typical suburban/urban form are not the tough product that they once were, they've been softened to make them comfortable. There is no reason, unless as I said you work in a mine, what jeans were first invented for, that jeans should still be being used over other, more practical fabrics.
You want a way to tax the rich and not the poor? Tax fashion items over $100. The government would make billions.
The most I've paid for jeans is like $50. I use them because they're comfortable. I can find khakis or slacks that cost a hell of a lot more than some jeans.
edit: Yes FM, I am a fast reader
Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-03-14 19:24:50)
They're comfortable. Like I said, jeans were not meant to be comfortable, they were meant to be tough, and making them comfortable removed all their practical aspects.HurricaИe wrote:
lol wutFlaming_Maniac wrote:
They represent so many aspects of what is wrong with society. Materialism, consumerism, lack of perspective when it comes to needs, all to the highest degree. The product in many cases intentionally comes defective. What. the. hell. Now kudos to the companies that can market this crap and make millions off of it, really it's impressive, but the fact they make millions on this stuff is absurd. Jeans have lived well past their usefulness in our everyday society, and have become nothing more than a personal statement that costs more than $50.HurricaИe wrote:
What's wrong with jeans? Or do you prefer clown suits... you clown porn fanatic you.
I could deal with some degree of excessiveness, but even the product in its pure, efficient form is flawed. Jeans themselves are an obsolete product that takes forever to dry when wet, lets the wind through comparatively a lot more, and when in the typical suburban/urban form are not the tough product that they once were, they've been softened to make them comfortable. There is no reason, unless as I said you work in a mine, what jeans were first invented for, that jeans should still be being used over other, more practical fabrics.
You want a way to tax the rich and not the poor? Tax fashion items over $100. The government would make billions.
The most I've paid for jeans is like $50. I use them because they're comfortable. I can find khakis or slacks that cost a hell of a lot more than some jeans.
edit: Yes FM, I am a fast reader
Yeah you can find a lot of clothing items that cost more than $50. Those however, in most cases actually look nice, and can be worn formally. That doesn't really excuse it, but you aren't paying tens or hundreds of dollars that should be taken back and fixed.
you've never worn carhartts. or you've never worked a day in your life. there is nothing defective about good work pants.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
They represent so many aspects of what is wrong with society. Materialism, consumerism, lack of perspective when it comes to needs, all to the highest degree. The product in many cases intentionally comes defective. What. the. hell. Now kudos to the companies that can market this crap and make millions off of it, really it's impressive, but the fact they make millions on this stuff is absurd. Jeans have lived well past their usefulness in our everyday society, and have become nothing more than a personal statement that costs more than $50.
I could deal with some degree of excessiveness, but even the product in its pure, efficient form is flawed. Jeans themselves are an obsolete product that takes forever to dry when wet, lets the wind through comparatively a lot more, and when in the typical suburban/urban form are not the tough product that they once were, they've been softened to make them comfortable. There is no reason, unless as I said you work in a mine, what jeans were first invented for, that jeans should still be being used over other, more practical fabrics.
You want a way to tax the rich and not the poor? Tax fashion items over $100. The government would make billions.
pants cant be tough and comfortable?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
they were meant to be tough, and making them comfortable removed all their practical aspects.
Last edited by Reciprocity (2008-03-14 19:33:58)
Not the second. I haven't even heard of carhartts.Reciprocity wrote:
you've never worn carhartts. or you've never worked a day in your life. there is nothing defective about good work pants.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
They represent so many aspects of what is wrong with society. Materialism, consumerism, lack of perspective when it comes to needs, all to the highest degree. The product in many cases intentionally comes defective. What. the. hell. Now kudos to the companies that can market this crap and make millions off of it, really it's impressive, but the fact they make millions on this stuff is absurd. Jeans have lived well past their usefulness in our everyday society, and have become nothing more than a personal statement that costs more than $50.
I could deal with some degree of excessiveness, but even the product in its pure, efficient form is flawed. Jeans themselves are an obsolete product that takes forever to dry when wet, lets the wind through comparatively a lot more, and when in the typical suburban/urban form are not the tough product that they once were, they've been softened to make them comfortable. There is no reason, unless as I said you work in a mine, what jeans were first invented for, that jeans should still be being used over other, more practical fabrics.
You want a way to tax the rich and not the poor? Tax fashion items over $100. The government would make billions.
There is nothing defective about good work pants, that's my point. If the jeans are sturdy, quality pants that's great, but 99% of the time (practically willing to put money on that) the kind people wear in the suburbs/urban areas are either a) cheap, and as with anything, are not quality or b) superficial, not meant for working.
Carpenter jeans were part of our uniform for the scout troop I was in, and I hated it. They tore easily, were colder in the winter than any other kind of pants, and you were pretty much screwed if you got them wet on a cold weekend. They hold so much water they get ridiculously heavier when wet as well, making them a bitch to backpack with.
I loved the zipoff pants that were in fashion a few years ago. Practical as all get out.
Yet to see a pair of jeans that were.Reciprocity wrote:
pants cant be tough and comfortable?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
they were meant to be tough, and making them comfortable removed all their practical aspects.
right hereFlaming_Maniac wrote:
Yet to see a pair of jeans that were.Reciprocity wrote:
pants cant be tough and comfortable?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
they were meant to be tough, and making them comfortable removed all their practical aspects.
Oh, they didn't look like denim, and you said duck hunting so I thought they might be waterproof? Anyways what stores can you get them at?Reciprocity wrote:
right hereFlaming_Maniac wrote:
Yet to see a pair of jeans that were.Reciprocity wrote:
pants cant be tough and comfortable?
they're a very heavy denim. brand new they're like cardboard, but they break-in very well. I'm not sure why they call them duck pants, they aren't specificallly meant for duck hunting and they aren't water-proof, but it does take a lot of rain to saturate them. The front knee area is a double layer of denim and they use a lot of rivets. they've got pockets on the side of each leg and a hammer loop on the left leg. I've never had a seam break.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Oh, they didn't look like denim, and you said duck hunting so I thought they might be waterproof? Anyways what stores can you get them at?
barring abuse, a single pair of duck pants lasts me a year or two. that's being worn 5+days a week either working on cars and trucks, or doing construction and being washed at least three times per week.
I hate to sound like a salesman, but they're great pants.
http://www.carhartt.com/
Levi's 559
Well see then those pants are win. The fact that I, or most people, have never even heard of them, however, kind of proves my point.Reciprocity wrote:
they're a very heavy denim. brand new they're like cardboard, but they break-in very well. I'm not sure why they call them duck pants, they aren't specificallly meant for duck hunting and they aren't water-proof, but it does take a lot of rain to saturate them. The front knee area is a double layer of denim and they use a lot of rivets. they've got pockets on the side of each leg and a hammer loop on the left leg. I've never had a seam break.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Oh, they didn't look like denim, and you said duck hunting so I thought they might be waterproof? Anyways what stores can you get them at?
barring abuse, a single pair of duck pants lasts me a year or two. that's being worn 5+days a week either working on cars and trucks, or doing construction and being washed at least three times per week.
I hate to sound like a salesman, but they're great pants.
http://www.carhartt.com/
I love my dickies.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
on good job Rec ..... except there not denim, there canvas ........... carhartts are still 100% cotton just like denim jeans buts its how they are manufacture is where the difference in denim and canvas comes outFlaming_Maniac wrote:
Well see then those pants are win. The fact that I, or most people, have never even heard of them, however, kind of proves my point.Reciprocity wrote:
they're a very heavy denim. brand new they're like cardboard, but they break-in very well. I'm not sure why they call them duck pants, they aren't specificallly meant for duck hunting and they aren't water-proof, but it does take a lot of rain to saturate them. The front knee area is a double layer of denim and they use a lot of rivets. they've got pockets on the side of each leg and a hammer loop on the left leg. I've never had a seam break.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Oh, they didn't look like denim, and you said duck hunting so I thought they might be waterproof? Anyways what stores can you get them at?
barring abuse, a single pair of duck pants lasts me a year or two. that's being worn 5+days a week either working on cars and trucks, or doing construction and being washed at least three times per week.
I hate to sound like a salesman, but they're great pants.
http://www.carhartt.com/
Carhartt makes different degrees of those pants .... the ones you show are the heaviest bc of the double knee, you can go down 1 level to single knee (the most popular and what I wear) or go another to the B182 Carhartt pants they are 7.5 oz in compared to the 12 oz double/single pants with the same durability
to check where you can purchase ... click site <---
I was sick on my Jeans last night. I think.
Might of been my mate.
He said it was me though.
Which is probably was.
Might of been my mate.
He said it was me though.
Which is probably was.
I should probably add I had them tailor fittedZimmer wrote:
No, it really isn't.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
Actually it is
There was a test on the TV a while back - "Are brand jeans really much better quality?"
Levis and Diesel were compared to Tesco ( largest supermarket in the UK ) jeans.
Guess what? Wear and tear = same. Design = same. Feel = same.
Only difference was that 2 of them had stupid little names on the side of them and stupid price tags.
Welcome to the real world.
And I live in the real world, no other pair of jeans can get you laid by themselves, trust me I have many pairs of jeans, some cheap some well, not so cheap.
dear godTheEternalPessimist wrote:
I should probably add I had them tailor fittedZimmer wrote:
No, it really isn't.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
Actually it is
There was a test on the TV a while back - "Are brand jeans really much better quality?"
Levis and Diesel were compared to Tesco ( largest supermarket in the UK ) jeans.
Guess what? Wear and tear = same. Design = same. Feel = same.
Only difference was that 2 of them had stupid little names on the side of them and stupid price tags.
Welcome to the real world.
And I live in the real world, no other pair of jeans can get you laid by themselves, trust me I have many pairs of jeans, some cheap some well, not so cheap.
ps: The only woman who bangs you cause of your jeans is one with AIDS
never heard of jeans getting you laid ......... what you got a $100 dollar bill hanging out the zipperTheEternalPessimist wrote:
I should probably add I had them tailor fittedZimmer wrote:
No, it really isn't.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
Actually it is
There was a test on the TV a while back - "Are brand jeans really much better quality?"
Levis and Diesel were compared to Tesco ( largest supermarket in the UK ) jeans.
Guess what? Wear and tear = same. Design = same. Feel = same.
Only difference was that 2 of them had stupid little names on the side of them and stupid price tags.
Welcome to the real world.
And I live in the real world, no other pair of jeans can get you laid by themselves, trust me I have many pairs of jeans, some cheap some well, not so cheap.
He wears them at the Jeans fetish club.SEREMAKER wrote:
never heard of jeans getting you laid ......... what you got a $100 dollar bill hanging out the zipperTheEternalPessimist wrote:
I should probably add I had them tailor fittedZimmer wrote:
No, it really isn't.
There was a test on the TV a while back - "Are brand jeans really much better quality?"
Levis and Diesel were compared to Tesco ( largest supermarket in the UK ) jeans.
Guess what? Wear and tear = same. Design = same. Feel = same.
Only difference was that 2 of them had stupid little names on the side of them and stupid price tags.
Welcome to the real world.
And I live in the real world, no other pair of jeans can get you laid by themselves, trust me I have many pairs of jeans, some cheap some well, not so cheap.
lol, or one that likes a guy with a good assHurricaИe wrote:
dear godTheEternalPessimist wrote:
I should probably add I had them tailor fittedZimmer wrote:
No, it really isn't.
There was a test on the TV a while back - "Are brand jeans really much better quality?"
Levis and Diesel were compared to Tesco ( largest supermarket in the UK ) jeans.
Guess what? Wear and tear = same. Design = same. Feel = same.
Only difference was that 2 of them had stupid little names on the side of them and stupid price tags.
Welcome to the real world.
And I live in the real world, no other pair of jeans can get you laid by themselves, trust me I have many pairs of jeans, some cheap some well, not so cheap.
ps: The only woman who bangs you cause of your jeans is one with AIDS
Most of the jeans in this thread look like denim sacks tied to your waist.
Last edited by TheEternalPessimist (2008-03-15 08:31:39)
1 pair of US Polo Assn., 2 Levi's and 1 Covington. I like all of them.
Levi SilverTab in 29 x 32
If some company creates a jeans that you can wear right after they're washed and the pants will feel like you've been wearing them for days and are fully broken in, those will be my new favorite and I will worship those jeans.
If some company creates a jeans that you can wear right after they're washed and the pants will feel like you've been wearing them for days and are fully broken in, those will be my new favorite and I will worship those jeans.