Kmarion wrote:
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
The part about this being the most ridiculous argument you've seen me attempt, words like that are usually for when someone feels things have gone over the line. Good to know they haven't.
Not over the line. Just abnormally shallow compared to your other post.
My posts all come from the same brain, there can be no difference in maturity between them. The only difference is how much you agree with them or not.
Kmarion wrote:
You simply looked to much into my example. Your coming off a bit paranoid tbh.
Mentioning the Nazis is pretty much bad debate form across the board. There are a slew of other examples that could have been chosen, but you chose that one. I tend to think you were just a little riled up at me from my previous post and it was a reactionary example.
Kmarion wrote:
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
That's judgmental? In that case I'm extremely judgmental, one of my favorite pastimes is profiling the people I see around me. Just because it pisses me off doesn't mean I act on it, besides lowering my opinion of said person. People are also entitled to be incredibly dumb, that doesn't stop me from trying to rectify the situation.
In all honesty I used to be the same way when I was younger. I actually made a conscious effort to change that behavior in my life. Yes, it will make you happier.
Happier if I do what? Stop analyzing the people I meet? Stop looking for their bias so I can play to it? Stop trying to determine who is competent and can be trusted, and who is an incompetent fool? The things I have learned and the benefits I have reaped from it are some of the most important things in my life.
I don't like liars and fakes. These people that I am talking about, who I said, "Nothing pisses me off more than when someone hears a story about a brutal murder or rape and acts all sad about it." about, are liars and fakes. They say "Oh that is so sad, I feel so sorry for that person," bullshit. They don't feel sorry for that person at all, if they actually did they would do something, anything to rectify the situation, or at least it would still be on their mind an hour later. It isn't even important enough for them to keep it in their thoughts, but, like Pavlov's dog, they have been trained to cry at every socially-defined heartbreaking story they see. There are some cases where people do feel truly bad for the wronged party, but they are in the minority.
I am young, yes. However I have been told a whole slew of things would change when I become a teenager (awkward years my ass), and very, very few of their projections were realized. I have had it beaten into head by my parents, by the media, by my friends, and by just about every older person I meet that doesn't meet me through some sort of screening. They all seemed to be so sure they knew about my priorities, my political leanings, my interests, my responsibilities, and how these aspects would change in five years. It was about 90% a load of crap, and because of that I consider the 10% of stuff they were right about to be a coincidence as a result. So you'll have to excuse me when I don't think you will ever be able to tell what will make me happy or not as I "mature".
Kmarion wrote:
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
On a slightly different note, I would consider myself a very happy person, I just get my kicks from the small things. I have no problems amusing myself.
You said it not me. <insert tremendous winking yellow face>
Kmarion wrote:
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Everyone is an elitist (irony?), it's only a matter of how subtly they state themselves. Can you, in sound mind, believe your ideals to be wrong? We all think ourselves right in abstract ideas, I just don't bother to word them all nicely to avoid stomping on someone else's opinion. I come here for a clash of ideas, a clash of ideals, and don't enjoy people tip-toeing around rather than getting to the point. I don't particularly mean to steamroll anyone, it only disappoints me that they don't stand up for themselves, but I do enjoy when someone sticks up and tells me no.
It not that you believe your ideas aren't wrong that makes an elitist. It's when you get pissed at the thought of someone else having a different opinion or emotion.
Not a different opinion or emotion, a stupid opinion or emotion. There are many issues where very smart people on both sides have fundamentally opposing views, such as abortion, gay rights, etc., but other times it is really inexcusable. You wouldn't be angered at the opinions of a Neo-Nazi? (and now we're even on the Nazi count, just don't go playing a racecard or something
)
Spearhead wrote:
Flaming maniac, are you honestly suggesting the world hasn't changed?
Tell that to the freed slaves after the civil war.
Tell that to women in the 1960's who for the first time started getting jobs and starting careers.
Tell that to the liberated Jews and other victims of genocide after World War 2.
The list, of course, goes on and on. Forever.
I'm extremely judgemental, too. But when I debate and think about politics I try to be as neutral and fair as possible, and try to understand where other people are coming from, even if they don't agree with me.
The world hasn't changed.
There is the same chance of human rights violations around the world, there is the same chance of a genocide around the world, there is the same chance that there is an oppressed group of people around the world. If we both take a 1000 year slice of history, you believe (not to put words in your mouth) that there are ups and downs in that time period, I believe that every bad event had the same likelihood of happening as a good event at that period, it is just a matter of a roll of the dice. Nothing fundamentally changes about the dice just because different numbers come up at different times.
Neutral and fair? How can a human being possibly neutral and fair? You have an opinion, express it.
I do enjoy having my views challenged and having intelligent people on the other side of the table. That doesn't mean I'm going to roll over to give them a chance to express their views.