fuck you tennessee

2007-12-03 09:15:30

#26

BlackKoala: Member; +215|6807

usmarine2005 wrote:
BlackKoala wrote:
Well you see, SEC fans are absolutely delusional. They are in firm belief that their conference is the only one and the country, and I swear to god, every, and I mean EVERY SEC fan has been programmed from birth to hate the Big Ten.
They beat each other two where none of them have less than 2 losses and that makes them better for some reason. I two am confused. We call that failure where I come from. They made LSU #1..they lost. Gave them #1 again...they lost. Both times to shitty ass teams.

Or my favorite is where they bitch about OSU jumping from 7 to 1, over WVU, Mizzou, KU, LSU, etc.

Yet it's okay for LSU to jump over VT, GA, Mizzou, KU, WVU, from 7 to 2.

2007-12-03 09:20:36

#27

Perv3rt: Lookin' through your Window; +193|6722|Man Diego

rhinoh2o74 wrote:
Anyone else think Hawaii should have been higher than 10th or is it just me?

Yes, I think they should have. I don't think you can rank a team with two losses ahead of a team that has no losses. Oh wait, nevermind they just did. What was I thinking?

2007-12-03 09:24:06

#28

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7244

Perv3rt wrote:
rhinoh2o74 wrote:
Anyone else think Hawaii should have been higher than 10th or is it just me?
Yes, I think they should have. I don't think you can rank a team with two losses ahead of a team that has no losses. Oh wait, nevermind they just did. What was I thinking?

Hawaii plays shit ass teams and is not in a BCS conference....

2007-12-03 09:50:12

#29

OrangeHound: Busy doing highfalutin adminy stuff ...; +1,335|7131|Washington DC

Perv3rt wrote:
rhinoh2o74 wrote:
Anyone else think Hawaii should have been higher than 10th or is it just me?
Yes, I think they should have. I don't think you can rank a team with two losses ahead of a team that has no losses. Oh wait, nevermind they just did. What was I thinking?

No they ranked the SEC Champion - arguably the strongest if not one of the strongest conferences - with two losses ahead of a minor college team that just happens to be undefeated because they beat a bunch of other minor college teams.

Bowl Forecast: Georgia 78, Hawaii 3 <---- Welcome to the majors, Hawaii

(What is funny about this, is that Georgia may be the strongest SEC team, but they are playing the weakest BCS team ... I'd be pissed if I were a Bulldawg).

2007-12-03 09:55:03

#30

Perv3rt: Lookin' through your Window; +193|6722|Man Diego

OrangeHound wrote:
Perv3rt wrote:
rhinoh2o74 wrote:
Anyone else think Hawaii should have been higher than 10th or is it just me?
Yes, I think they should have. I don't think you can rank a team with two losses ahead of a team that has no losses. Oh wait, nevermind they just did. What was I thinking?
No they ranked the SEC Champion - arguably the strongest if not one of the strongest conferences - with two losses ahead of a minor college team that just happens to be undefeated because they beat a bunch of other minor college teams.

Bowl Forecast: Georgia 78, Hawaii 3

So give me Hawaii +74 points, and we will wager whatever you like. Just because a team plays in a "big" conference doesn't entitle them to stay ahead of everyone else. I agree that the SEC & PAC 10 were probably the two best conferences this year. However, look at last year with Boise State beating Oklahoma, that was supposed to be a laugher too...right?

2007-12-03 13:10:02

#31

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7244

OrangeHound wrote:
(What is funny about this, is that Georgia may be the strongest SEC team, but they are playing the weakest BCS team ... I'd be pissed if I were a Bulldawg).

If you win the games it all works out in the end.

*talking about Georgia

Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-12-03 13:10:52)

2007-12-03 13:13:28

#32

ig: This topic seems to have no actual posts; +1,199|7004

i'm staying away from here

2007-12-03 13:15:27

#33

RECONDO67: Member; +60|7118|miami FL

SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.

2007-12-03 13:16:19

#34

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7244

RECONDO67 wrote:
SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.

I would like to see proof of that statement.

2007-12-03 13:18:57

#35

BlackKoala: Member; +215|6807

RECONDO67 wrote:
SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.

How the fuck...

You have got to be fucking...

^^ See my point earlier about delusional SEC fans?

2007-12-03 13:20:27

#36

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7100|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

usmarine2005 wrote:
RECONDO67 wrote:
SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.
I would like to see proof of that statement.

you have some sort of mental problem it seems from reading this thread.

well played.

BlackKoala wrote:
RECONDO67 wrote:
SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.
How the fuck...

You have got to be fucking...

^^ See my point earlier about delusional SEC fans?

are you even in the US?

(nvm that was white fusion)

and your fuckin retarded. whats the stronger conference?

Last edited by Des.Kmal (2007-12-03 13:21:11)

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-12-03 13:21:05

#37

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7244

Des.Kmal wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
RECONDO67 wrote:
SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.
I would like to see proof of that statement.
you have some sort of mental problem it seems from reading this thread.

well played.

hey another georgia fan. thank for the proof.

2007-12-03 13:21:49

#38

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7100|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

usmarine2005 wrote:
Des.Kmal wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
I would like to see proof of that statement.
you have some sort of mental problem it seems from reading this thread.

well played.
hey another georgia fan. thank for the proof.

btw, there is more SEC teams in the top 20 than any other conference.

4.

Last edited by Des.Kmal (2007-12-03 13:24:55)

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-12-03 13:25:36

#39

BlackKoala: Member; +215|6807

Des.Kmal wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
RECONDO67 wrote:
SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.
I would like to see proof of that statement.
you have some sort of mental problem it seems from reading this thread.

well played.

BlackKoala wrote:
RECONDO67 wrote:
SEC is the toughest conference in the nation and I feel is unfair for other conferences to go to bowl games when they play in flag football leagues.
How the fuck...

You have got to be fucking...

^^ See my point earlier about delusional SEC fans?
are you even in the US?

(nvm that was white fusion)

and your fuckin retarded. whats the stronger conference?

I didn't say the SEC wasn't strong, nor did I say they weren't the strongest, Mr. Literate. But anyone who says that "ALL" the other conferences are a flag football league is out of their mind.

2007-12-03 13:25:39

#40

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7202|California

SEC can SUC my nuts.

Vanderbilt? U of Arkansas? UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA?!

seriously.

2007-12-03 13:27:14

#41

RECONDO67: Member; +60|7118|miami FL

my team is UM and the played for several years in the BIG EAST which had no real opponents other than V TECH and Boston college.

look guys if you don't want to agree thats fine look it ur self. here is a link for you guys to see that some conferences have only one or to top teams
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/standings

2007-12-03 13:28:28

#42

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7100|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

stryyker wrote:
SEC can SUC my nuts.

Vanderbilt? U of Arkansas? UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA?!

seriously.

well. considering the amount of teams in the top 20. its clearly the stronger conference. but thats ok.

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-12-03 13:28:31

#43

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7244

Des.Kmal wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
Des.Kmal wrote:

you have some sort of mental problem it seems from reading this thread.

well played.
hey another georgia fan. thank for the proof.

btw, there is more SEC teams in the top 20 than any other conference.

4.

ok? But I thought you people did not agree with the BCS. Well ig at least. LSU has been given 3 chances now to hold #1. Be nice if everyone had that chance.

2007-12-03 13:30:11

#44

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7100|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

usmarine2005 wrote:
Des.Kmal wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:

hey another georgia fan. thank for the proof.

btw, there is more SEC teams in the top 20 than any other conference.

4.
ok? But I thought you people did not agree with the BCS. Well ig at least. LSU has been given 3 chances now to hold #1. Be nice if everyone had that chance.

... LOL!

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-12-03 13:30:14

#45

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7202|California

Des.Kmal wrote:
stryyker wrote:
SEC can SUC my nuts.

Vanderbilt? U of Arkansas? UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA?!

seriously.
well. considering the amount of teams in the top 20. its clearly the stronger conference. but thats ok.

Most likely due to bullshit match-ups within the conferences.

edit: Now that I think about it... Bullshit happens all the time in College ball. Like UCLA allowing Dorrell to coach. Ever.

Bah, I don't want to argue about college ball. I will just express my hatred for Tom Brady instead.

Last edited by stryyker (2007-12-03 13:33:02)

2007-12-03 13:30:30

#46

RECONDO67: Member; +60|7118|miami FL

OHIO and Notre dame get the same chances too.

2007-12-03 13:32:30

#47

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7100|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

stryyker wrote:
Des.Kmal wrote:
stryyker wrote:
SEC can SUC my nuts.

Vanderbilt? U of Arkansas? UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA?!

seriously.
well. considering the amount of teams in the top 20. its clearly the stronger conference. but thats ok.
Most likely due to bullshit match-ups within the conferences.

im SURE it is. since that makes sense.

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-12-03 13:35:34

#48

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7202|California

Des.Kmal wrote:
stryyker wrote:
Des.Kmal wrote:
well. considering the amount of teams in the top 20. its clearly the stronger conference. but thats ok.
Most likely due to bullshit match-ups within the conferences.
im SURE it is. since that makes sense.

^^^ See above edit

2007-12-03 13:37:00

#49

Des.Kmal: Member; +917|7100|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

stryyker wrote:
Des.Kmal wrote:
stryyker wrote:
Most likely due to bullshit match-ups within the conferences.
im SURE it is. since that makes sense.
^^^ See above edit

agreed.

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal

2007-12-03 13:41:20

#50

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|7214|St. Andrews / Oslo

imo, Big 10 > SEC

But what do I know? I'm just a eurofag

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png

BF2S Forums fuck you tennessee

usmarine2005 wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

rhinoh2o74 wrote:

Perv3rt wrote:

rhinoh2o74 wrote:

Perv3rt wrote:

rhinoh2o74 wrote:

OrangeHound wrote:

Perv3rt wrote:

rhinoh2o74 wrote:

OrangeHound wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

RECONDO67 wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

stryyker wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Board footer