BF2S Forums American Soldier Abducted Tortured Killed

m3thod wrote:

CannonFodder11b wrote:

m3thod wrote:

That's nothing to be proud of.

Did I say I was proud of it?  The only thing I'm proud of is the fact I have a pair of balls, and I show them everyday I step outside the wire.  I stand on my own feet, and walk out the gate, knowing that at any moment I could get launched several feet by an APIED, VBIED,IED, or DBIED. 

Whats the biggest thing you worry about? whats for lunch?  Who you're going to flame on the threads?
ME I worry about walking back into the wire without any more holes then I left with.

You think i actually care? Claim all the testicular fortitude you want I'm sure you have bucketloads.  My stance is ultimately you people never had business in Iraq as such you will get no sympathy or appraisal from me whether or not you have the grapefruits to step outside the wire.  IMO you're unfortunately just another dispensable pawn in the wider game of power and corruption.

Yeah so I guess i was right they only thing you worry about is feeding your face, and flaming people. 
Thats cool bro, flame away.  Seriously I don't care about you, or what you claim to be, your just another pimple faced jackass with a computer that feels he knows more then the next guy who happens to be living the shit.  You're sig states people should grow a set of balls. So I think its time you follow your own advice.
Grow a set, and do more then fondle them.

m3thod wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Total bollocks.

That must be a new part of TBF2. If you really want to know about what's going in Iraq, ask the guys who have actually been there and what they think should be done, they will know more about the situation than anybody else, and I'm talking about the guys who put their lives on the line every single day, no news reporters.

I don't need to.  Their answer:

Nuke it.

Why?  They can't defeat a faceless enemy motivated by and unbreakable ideology.

Sux to be them.

WTF m3thod, that is a gross generalization based on no knowledge whatsoever , obviously, of the typical soldiers point of view.

Now are you enlightened?

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

I don't need to.  Their answer:

Nuke it.

Why?  They can't defeat a faceless enemy motivated by and unbreakable ideology.

Sux to be them.

WTF m3thod, that is a gross generalization based on no knowledge whatsoever , obviously, of the typical soldiers point of view.

Now are you enlightened?

Annoying isn't it when someone make gross generalisations based of groundless and factually devoid information eh?

So you admit to what you did on the condition you have company in guilt?

Coward.

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

WTF m3thod, that is a gross generalization based on no knowledge whatsoever , obviously, of the typical soldiers point of view.

Now are you enlightened?

Annoying isn't it when someone make gross generalisations based of groundless and factually devoid information eh?

So you admit to what you did on the condition you have company in guilt?

Coward.

I only did what you the king of generalisations is famed for.  Anyway I would have thought claiming the whole of the ME should be nuked is mainstream thinking amongst the armed forces would have been taken with a pinch of salt.....

And less of the insults young man.

Last edited by m3thod (2007-05-27 12:39:15)

m3thod wrote:

CannonFodder11b wrote:

m3thod wrote:

You think i actually care? Claim all the testicular fortitude you want I'm sure you have bucketloads.  My stance is ultimately you people never had business in Iraq as such you will get no sympathy or appraisal from me whether or not you have the grapefruits to step outside the wire.  IMO you're unfortunately just another dispensable pawn in the wider game of power and corruption.

Yeah so I guess i was right they only thing you worry about is feeding your face, and flaming people. 
Thats cool bro, flame away.  Seriously I don't care about you, or what you claim to be, your just another pimple faced jackass with a computer that feels he knows more then the next guy who happens to be living the shit.  You're sig states people should grow a set of balls. So I think its time you follow your own advice.
Grow a set, and do more then fondle them.

Seriously try to differentiate between a flaming and genuine responses.  I haven't sworn at you nor have i stated your untimely death would give me pleasure or in fact any other rubbish.  Still it's ironic as you refer to my good self as a "purple face jackass" yet accuse me of flaming   FYI i have really good skin, i use Anthony Logistics for Men and i highly recommend it.  Ask her indoors to send you some with all that sand and sun I'm sure it will be put to some good use.

Now back on topic I don't know more than you or anyone who is Iraq and neither have i claimed to do so.  What i do know is foreign presence in Iraq is horseshit and i am strongly against your continued occupation. Simple as. So claim all the bravado you want you will get no credit from me.

It's not who you are its what you stand for that i argue against.

Actually you misquoted me, and i feel offended. I think im gonna cry.
I called you a "pimple faced jackass" you quoted me as saying "purple faces jackass"

oug wrote:

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

The US tourture to save people.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

That's right, take a tiny section out of an entire paragraph in order to make me sound like a fool.  Anyone can play that game, but I am not going to stoop to that.  Why don't you read the entire thing and bold the part that you are trying to respond to.  The fact is, the motivation for the American government tourturing prisoners is different than the motivation of terrorists/insurgents tourturing prisoners.  Whether you like it or not, this is a undeniable fact.  I again stress that I do not think that tourture is moral, or that it should be used.

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Annoying isn't it when someone make gross generalisations based of groundless and factually devoid information eh?

So you admit to what you did on the condition you have company in guilt?

Coward.

I only did what you the king of generalisations is famed for.  Anyway I would have thought claiming the whole of the ME should be nuked is mainstream thinking amongst the armed forces would have been taken with a pinch of salt.....

And less of the insults young man.

How 'bout you post some of these gross generalizations you've seen me make?

Accusations without the links to demonstrate your point are just baseless.

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

I only did what you the king of generalisations is famed for.  Anyway I would have thought claiming the whole of the ME should be nuked is mainstream thinking amongst the armed forces would have been taken with a pinch of salt.....

And less of the insults young man.

How 'bout you post some of these gross generalizations you've seen me make?

Accusations without the links to demonstrate your point are just baseless.

1. "These people are insane".

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=74474

2. Great Britain has an Extremist Problem how did you put it? "This is mainstream thinking"

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=61036

I could go on but i associate the word generalisation with the name ATG.

You fail.
Link #1, these people. I'm referring to the specific people mentioned in the story I linked to.

Link #2 Great Britain has an Extremist Problem this story was about extremist preaching from some mosques. Not all, some.
There is no generalization in either thread.

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

1. "These people are insane".

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=74474

2. Great Britain has an Extremist Problem how did you put it? "This is mainstream thinking"

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=61036

I could go on but i associate the word generalisation with the name ATG.

You fail.
Link #1, these people. I'm referring to the specific people mentioned in the story I linked to.

Link #2 Great Britain has an Extremist Problem this story was about extremist preaching from some mosques. Not all, some.
There is no generalization in either thread.

Link # 1 These indicates Shia Muslims whom number quite a few hundred million. You think only those people in your link self flagellate and cut children?

Link #2 Your original post long since edited stated "listen to their words, this is mainstream thinking".  Oh forgotten about that hadn't we?

Perhaps I didn't edit it.

I think I was saying that the extremist literature was being sold in mainstream mosques and radical hate speech is spoken there too, which I stand by.

ATG wrote:

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

You fail.
Link #1, these people. I'm referring to the specific people mentioned in the story I linked to.

Link #2 Great Britain has an Extremist Problem this story was about extremist preaching from some mosques. Not all, some.
There is no generalization in either thread.

Link # 1 These indicates Shia Muslims whom number quite a few hundred million. You think only those people in your link self flagellate and cut children?

Link #2 Your original post long since edited stated "listen to their words, this is mainstream thinking".  Oh forgotten about that hadn't we?

Perhaps I didn't edit it.

I think I was saying that the extremist literature was being sold in mainstream mosques and radical hate speech is spoken there too, which I stand by.

You did edit it, the 'Last edited by ATG (2007-01-21 17:24:03)' kinda gives it away.  i remember clearly what you wrote and in what context.

edit: Congraulate yourself! It was this post and thread where i decided to get involved here after lurking in the forums since day one.

Maybe extremist literature is being sold i cant verify this as the truth as god knows how long its been since i stepped into one.  But why buy it when its freely available on the Internet?  Whats is the difference between reading extremist literature and watching extremist terrorist and military behaviour on the Internet? Why read when you can see....

Radical hate speech is spoken everywhere, hell I'll take you to a thousands pubs where some fool not to dissimilar to your local mullah is having a rant....what makes you think radical hate speech is exclusive to mosques?

Last edited by m3thod (2007-05-27 14:37:20)

M.O.A.B wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Radical hate speech is spoken everywhere, hell I'll take you to a thousands pubs where some fool not to dissimilar to your local mullah is having a rant....what makes you think radical hate speech is exclusive to mosques?

I don't particularly think some guy in a bar is ranting about blowing someone up or wiping Israel off the map. Plus the likelihood that said guy in bar is drunk when he say's something similar to that.

That's cos he'll be ranting about the failure of multiculturalism and how we should send all the ethnics back to the colonies.  How about this marketing gem: Lets show the ethnics the door in 2004!

Dress it up all you want, hate speech is hate speech.

S.Lythberg wrote:

One solution for our Middle east problem:

http://www.garnertedarmstrong.ws/Mark_W … _97775.jpg

Seriously, if these people can't act human, then they don't deserve a humane death.

Instant vaporization is almost too good for them, I hope most aren't killed too quickly.

amen dude.

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

It doen't matter what the dictionary says about the differences between tourture and interrigation.  Are you saying the definition in some dictionary is going to be more reliable than the United Nations Convention against touture?

The United Nations Convention against touture would be reliable if anyone would bother placing reliance upon it.

That was an incredibly obvious statement...
I don't see how it relates to what I said though.

Whats the point? Quote it from the popes ass if you want, no one abides by these pointless definations UN or no UN.