I said without deformities or decapitations. That picture is deformed or decapitated.DeathUnlimited wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=56399[NeMe$i$.Dr4g0ncl4w] wrote:
Most humans exept for deformities or decapitations have 2 arms 2 legs and 2 eyes.
Or neither. Photoshopped I am guessing. Actually, I know it is, a person cannot live solely on legs.[NeMe$i$.Dr4g0ncl4w] wrote:
I said without deformities or decapitations. That picture is deformed or decapitated.DeathUnlimited wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=56399[NeMe$i$.Dr4g0ncl4w] wrote:
Most humans exept for deformities or decapitations have 2 arms 2 legs and 2 eyes.
It's not deformed or decapitated, it's plain photoshopped and you didn't forbid nor mention that.[NeMe$i$.Dr4g0ncl4w] wrote:
I said without deformities or decapitations. That picture is deformed or decapitated.DeathUnlimited wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=56399[NeMe$i$.Dr4g0ncl4w] wrote:
Most humans exept for deformities or decapitations have 2 arms 2 legs and 2 eyes.
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-02-25 07:12:20)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
allright, how about this then: you are right, proving everybody's claims here wrong. now prove me wrong again.
Posting on this thread on the forums at bf2s.com you will be using the internet and/or a computer,laptop,net cafe etc
Disprove this ::
You (DeathUnlimited) can prove everything wrong.
EDIT: forgot a key word(s)
You (DeathUnlimited) can prove everything wrong.
EDIT: forgot a key word(s)
Last edited by R0lyP0ly (2007-02-25 18:26:59)
You = Stupid disprove it.
I don't know if this has been said yet... but you're not disproving anything, most of the time you're just repeating it in a different way and saying that means it's wrong.
He Got OWNED !!!Simon wrote:
Posting on this thread on the forums at bf2s.com you will be using the internet and/or a computer,laptop,net cafe etc
Simon WIN !
x^n + y^n = z^n
for every whole interger where x>2
Proceed............
for every whole interger where x>2
Proceed............
I'm gonna post my math homework here.
Naah.
Prove this wrong: I like titties
Naah.
Prove this wrong: I like titties
Just for laughs,
Disprove the concept of nothing.
Disprove the concept of nothing.
i think this thread is stupid, prove it wrong
24 pages prove you wrong, my friend.*=]AD[=*Pro_NL wrote:
i think this thread is stupid, prove it wrong
What should I claim..
David Hasselhoff is the antichrist.
I need around tree fiddy.
DonFck wrote:
24 pages prove you wrong, my friend.*=]AD[=*Pro_NL wrote:
i think this thread is stupid, prove it wrong
What should I claim..
David Hasselhoff is the antichrist.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/1514/devil2tt1.gif
Oh god that made my day
I am at a computer right now.
Oi, dont hassle the hoff.DonFck wrote:
24 pages prove you wrong, my friend.*=]AD[=*Pro_NL wrote:
i think this thread is stupid, prove it wrong
What should I claim..
David Hasselhoff is the antichrist.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/1514/devil2tt1.gif
lol.
Since statements of preference are merely a matter of taste; or something does not fit an average (or 'norm'); it is not right or wrong - and you are WRONG for thinking 'a preference' could be wrong. So now you can enjoy your gay (male) porn.Fredline wrote:
Ummm...that makes NO sense. Nice way to puss out d00d.topal63 wrote:
Since we are obviously talking about you...Fredline wrote:
I claim you DON'T prefer 'Gay (Male) Porn', prove me wrong....
Yes, you do prefer 'Gay (Male) Porn.' You were just afraid to admit it.
junipertree wrote:
allright, how about this then: you are right, proving everybody's claims here wrong. now prove me wrong again.
This has been said soooo many times, I think it's the most popular claim yet. Once again, I haven't been able to prove every claim wrong.R0lyP0ly wrote:
You (DeathUnlimited) can prove everything wrong.
Let's give some length to Simon's e-pen, you won (if that Einstein-topal63 won't see your post)Simon wrote:
Posting on this thread on the forums at bf2s.com you will be using the internet and/or a computer,laptop,net cafe etc
Stupid people don't end up working as engineers in Nokia..alpinestar wrote:
You = Stupid disprove it.
Yes it has been said and yes in many cases it's true, so what?Sgt_Sieg wrote:
I don't know if this has been said yet... but you're not disproving anything, most of the time you're just repeating it in a different way and saying that means it's wrong.
that sentence says "let S be the set of real numbers...."Masques wrote:
http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/6061 … undsj4.jpg
If I won't let it be, then that makes no sense, so I win.
so you say x+y=z??00Colburn wrote:
x^n + y^n = z^n
for every whole interger where x>2
no it isn't.
x^n+y^n=x^n+y^n
I claim You don't like all titties. men's tits for example or fat 80-years old grannie'sCaptainMack wrote:
I like titties
24 pages are rarely wrongDonFck wrote:
24 pages prove you wrong, my friend.*=]AD[=*Pro_NL wrote:
i think this thread is stupid, prove it wrong
What should I claim..
David Hasselhoff is the antichrist.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/1514/devil2tt1.gif
about the antichrist thing... I'd say this looks more like Hasselhoff:
Nothing is nothing. it yet is impossible. Fotons are everywhere..Coolbeano wrote:
Just for laughs,
Disprove the concept of nothing.
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-02-26 06:55:28)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
I don't think you have enough money to live in a hotel^*AlphA*^ wrote:
I'm in The Hague, The Netherlands right now !
(yea, I know that answer is lame, but I couldn't figure out anything else, also you didn't say you meant the city of hague)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Though if not proving something wrong is getting OWNED then this wasn't the first time. And since it wasn't the first time Simon didn't WIN, he was merely just another competetor. Your statement is wrong.Andoura wrote:
He Got OWNED !!!Simon wrote:
Posting on this thread on the forums at bf2s.com you will be using the internet and/or a computer,laptop,net cafe etc
Simon WIN !
According to your status you aren't online right now. Though you could be doing something else with your computer. Anyways I doubt that you spend all your life sitting in front of your computer, so you should have been more accurate on when you are on the computer. Your statement is wrong.ShoopDaWoop wrote:
I am at a computer right now.
Last edited by NooBesT[FiN] (2007-02-26 06:51:59)
ShoopDaWhoop wrote:
I am at a computer right now.