This is about the securing long term oil supplies. Your predictable "whaa whaa why am i pay $2 measly bucks for a GAL" is not applicable to this debate, as your ranting about shot term fluctuations in the price of gas.silo1180 wrote:
Hooray another Bush-bash/"what's wrong with Iraq!?" thread...Ace.O.Lamb wrote:
Lets face it, Iraq is a mess because of Bush's actions. There has been many civilian casualties as a result of bombings and suicide bombings which are a result of the US and Uk 'Liberating' Iraq. Hundreds of US and British troops killed and thousands injured.
And through all the bloodshed how far have we really come? This summer UK troops are pulling out (at last) as Blair finally realises we have really achieved very little. When will the government realise that terrorism cannot be beaten so easily. Although i dont think that terrosim was on Bush's agenda when he started this war, it was obviously for oil which is why there are now rumours of the U.S moving foces into Iran. Soon there will be more excuses for the US to invade other oil rich countries. Great!....
So back to the point how should Iraq be tackled. I think a huge offensive would do the trick, close all borders (as they are already doing) and then strip search the citys sector by sector, getting rid of all weapons and terrorists. Its a last resort but its the only way the US will be able to fully liberate iraq
And again... IF THIS WAR WAS FOR OIL, WHY THE HELL AM I STILL PAYING OVER $2/GAL @ THE PUMP. Please git yurself edumicated before you start wagging your tongue... really... just look through the D&ST forum and you will see a million of these threads.
GaC or create a thread.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.