| James Buchanan | 6% | 6% - 14 | ||||
| Andrew Johnson | 2% | 2% - 6 | ||||
| Ulysses Grant | 3% | 3% - 8 | ||||
| Herbert Hoover | 3% | 3% - 8 | ||||
| Warren Harding | 2% | 2% - 6 | ||||
| Bill Clinton | 14% | 14% - 29 | ||||
| George W. Bush | 57% | 57% - 118 | ||||
| Other (explain) | 8% | 8% - 17 | ||||
| Total: 206 | ||||||
Last edited by Deadly-Bulb (2007-02-21 20:21:41)
Almost gotta feel sorry for him...Chiefs led him down that dark twisty path...Deadly-Bulb wrote:
i would vote for warren harding, but... my personal opinions would force me to vote for:
LBJ... horrible godawful social programs and fabricating the gulf of tonkin incident to kick off the vietnam war. the man should have never been there.
blisteringsilence wrote:
How do you KNOW that he's an idiot?
Okay, that was a deliberately provocative phrasing on my behalf for shits and giggles ...guilty as charged! I should have kept it either entirely serious or entirely humourous given the inflamatory nature of the discussion.Kmarion wrote:
"What is it with Americans..." It amazes me that you still can't see your generalizing. Maybe read what you are writing?
Last edited by Braddock (2007-02-22 06:00:21)
usmarine2007 wrote:
Not sure how you can include the current President, or the last one for that matter since history has not had time to judge his actions.
usmarine2007 wrote:
usmarine2007 wrote:
Not sure how you can include the current President, or the last one for that matter since history has not had time to judge his actions.
Kmarion wrote:
You lack historical context to say this
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-02-22 10:16:23)
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Ronald Reagan.
Yep, because Hoover's natural selection option was working beautifully. He really knew how to help us with population control and shantytowns.Major_Spittle wrote:
FDR and the Raw Deal FTW. He sold the poor on a Tax that effects them many, many times more than it ever could the well off. Now we are all a slave to his socialism security system.
FDR may you burn in hell forever.
We've had some good presidents...m3thod wrote:
where is the all of them option?
Right so if another catastrophe like the Depression happens to occur again, I suppose it'd be better off without his reforms? FDIC for one. Also overlooking the fact that he is/was one of the more popular presidents.Major_Spittle wrote:
FDR and the Raw Deal FTW. He sold the poor on a Tax that effects them many, many times more than it ever could the well off. Now we are all a slave to his socialism security system.
FDR may you burn in hell forever.
Last edited by Smithereener (2007-02-22 15:47:38)
I hate all politicans.Smithereener wrote:
We've had some good presidents...m3thod wrote:
where is the all of them option?
True, we've had some less than perfect and horrible presidents, but name me a country that hasn't had a crappy/horrible ruler ever.
...or are media sheep or are too young to even remember another president.UGADawgs wrote:
Like a few people have said before, the sheer number of people who have voted Bush shows that people are either blinded by hatred of Bush or only know a couple of presidents.
Agreed. Bush is bad, but not the worst (sadly enough).UGADawgs wrote:
Like a few people have said before, the sheer number of people who have voted Bush shows that people are either blinded by hatred of Bush or only know a couple of presidents.
What's the point in having a poll if you're just going to dismiss the result on the grounds of your own personal opinions about why the people may have voted in such a way?UGSDawgs wrote:
Like a few people have said before, the sheer number of people who have voted Bush shows that people are either blinded by hatred of Bush or only know a couple of presidents.
He was calling people out. It is common knowledge that Americans don't exactly know their history like the back of their hand, and vote based purely on opinion. If you don't know any of the other names, you'll probably choose the ones you're most familiar with. Flame not intended, but:Braddock wrote:
What's the point in having a poll if you're just going to dismiss the result on the grounds of your own personal opinions about why the people may have voted in such a way?UGSDawgs wrote:
Like a few people have said before, the sheer number of people who have voted Bush shows that people are either blinded by hatred of Bush or only know a couple of presidents.
...lolTigerXtrm wrote:
Bush, no contest
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-02-23 10:25:50)
Last edited by Turquoise (2007-02-23 20:33:19)