Last edited by Commie Killer (2007-01-31 13:12:14)
Are you advocating the assassination of an elected head-of-state? Very enlightened mindset.Commie Killer wrote:
Sounds like someone needs a .50 BMG through their head.
Last edited by (T)eflon(S)hadow (2007-01-31 13:19:56)
Yep in 'the good old days' a CIA hit squad would have had explosives in his cigar quick sharp.SargeV1.4 wrote:
There are so many people, it really surprises me that nobody kills these presidents/leaders.. especially in the US of A, how hard is it to acquire a rifle? not very hard. So many millions of people, and only one of them needs to take care of Bush.
In big shiny words i suppose........KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you advocating the assassination of an elected head-of-state? Very enlightened mindset.Commie Killer wrote:
Sounds like someone needs a .50 BMG through their head.
Bush isn't trying to become a dictator. He may not be the best supporter of civil liberties and what not, but so far he has not made any power hungry vows for permanent power. That's why no one's gonna assassinate him.SargeV1.4 wrote:
There are so many people, it really surprises me that nobody kills these presidents/leaders.. especially in the US of A, how hard is it to acquire a rifle? not very hard. So many millions of people, and only one of them needs to take care of Bush.
QFEAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Let him set up his social state. When the people don't like it, they can revolt and have a civil war. Why should we give a damn what he does.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2007-01-31 14:41:44)
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2007-01-31 15:17:07)
why oh why would we be able to blockade Venezuela ?iamangry wrote:
Bush isn't trying to become a dictator. He may not be the best supporter of civil liberties and what not, but so far he has not made any power hungry vows for permanent power. That's why no one's gonna assassinate him.SargeV1.4 wrote:
There are so many people, it really surprises me that nobody kills these presidents/leaders.. especially in the US of A, how hard is it to acquire a rifle? not very hard. So many millions of people, and only one of them needs to take care of Bush.
On the topic of Chavez, I think we should just do one simple thing if he gets rid of his country's voting process...
Blockade his ports. Then we tell him that if he doesn't hold elections along the original schedule we will take care of him. If he doesn't, we take care of him.
He is doing away with term limits, not doing away with elections. It remains to be seen as to the ramifications, but please do not jump to conclusions.iamangry wrote:
Bush isn't trying to become a dictator. He may not be the best supporter of civil liberties and what not, but so far he has not made any power hungry vows for permanent power. That's why no one's gonna assassinate him.SargeV1.4 wrote:
There are so many people, it really surprises me that nobody kills these presidents/leaders.. especially in the US of A, how hard is it to acquire a rifle? not very hard. So many millions of people, and only one of them needs to take care of Bush.
On the topic of Chavez, I think we should just do one simple thing if he gets rid of his country's voting process...
Blockade his ports. Then we tell him that if he doesn't hold elections along the original schedule we will take care of him. If he doesn't, we take care of him.
I didn't, you assumed I was. I am simply examining one of the worst case scenarios for the Venezuelan people.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
He is doing away with term limits, not doing away with elections. It remains to be seen as to the ramifications, but please do not jump to conclusions.iamangry wrote:
Bush isn't trying to become a dictator. He may not be the best supporter of civil liberties and what not, but so far he has not made any power hungry vows for permanent power. That's why no one's gonna assassinate him.SargeV1.4 wrote:
There are so many people, it really surprises me that nobody kills these presidents/leaders.. especially in the US of A, how hard is it to acquire a rifle? not very hard. So many millions of people, and only one of them needs to take care of Bush.
On the topic of Chavez, I think we should just do one simple thing if he gets rid of his country's voting process...
Blockade his ports. Then we tell him that if he doesn't hold elections along the original schedule we will take care of him. If he doesn't, we take care of him.
Assuming a worse case scenario. I assumed off your assumption.iamangry wrote:
I didn't, you assumed I was. I am simply examining one of the worst case scenarios for the Venezuelan people.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
He is doing away with term limits, not doing away with elections. It remains to be seen as to the ramifications, but please do not jump to conclusions.iamangry wrote:
Bush isn't trying to become a dictator. He may not be the best supporter of civil liberties and what not, but so far he has not made any power hungry vows for permanent power. That's why no one's gonna assassinate him.
On the topic of Chavez, I think we should just do one simple thing if he gets rid of his country's voting process...
Blockade his ports. Then we tell him that if he doesn't hold elections along the original schedule we will take care of him. If he doesn't, we take care of him.
Someone who makes sense? omfgAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
Let him set up his social state. When the people don't like it, they can revolt and have a civil war. Why should we give a damn what he does.
If i remember correctly, Hitler was voted into power too...KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you advocating the assassination of an elected head-of-state? Very enlightened mindset.Commie Killer wrote:
Sounds like someone needs a .50 BMG through their head.
No, you see Ken, the key word in the second paragraph is "if". Maybe you missed it. This little two letter logic operator means that what I am saying is simply hypothetical observation of what MIGHT happen. No where do I assume this event WILL happen, or that i think it will happen. I didn't assume anything, you're assuming everything. So, I will give your advice back to you... don't jump to conclusions.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Assuming a worse case scenario. I assumed off your assumption.iamangry wrote:
I didn't, you assumed I was. I am simply examining one of the worst case scenarios for the Venezuelan people.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
He is doing away with term limits, not doing away with elections. It remains to be seen as to the ramifications, but please do not jump to conclusions.
Don't you love the technical distinction between assassination and murder? Politicians are so much better than us ordinary people.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Are you advocating the assassination of an elected head-of-state? Very enlightened mindset.Commie Killer wrote:
Sounds like someone needs a .50 BMG through their head.
I thought you kiwis were an insular bunch? Why should you care?Pubic wrote:
Wow, forcing venezuela to choose a certain system of government when it clearly wants something else, way to respect their freedom... *rollseyes* Why not round up some knights and footsoldiers, and go spread christianity by the sword while you're at it?
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-01-31 21:39:29)