| True | 49% | 49% - 58 | ||||
| False | 50% | 50% - 59 | ||||
| Total: 117 | ||||||
My point exactly. Although the period you chose for your example is most likely the one with the greatest differences between the two parties. Then of course they shot Kennedy and everything came back to normal...Kmarion wrote:
The Democratic Party used to be the conservative party.
Oh really, melting icecaps isn't long lasting or anything....UGADawgs wrote:
Because you really have to be ignorant of history to think that Bush is the worst. We've had worse presidents with much more lasting effects.BN wrote:
How is that?UGADawgs wrote:
Calling Bush the worst President is especially ignorant.
thats bad..loloug wrote:
Then of course they shot Kennedy and everything came back to normal...
Yes -- they're quite tasty, actually.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Democrats:
Kill babies.
Yes, because the Republicans have already called dibs on taking the 1st.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Want to take away the 2nd amendment.
Yes, but the Republicans would prefer we have to pay out the ass the private sector way. Either way, it's a losing game, because medicine has been hijacked by oligarchy and corporatism.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Want universal healthcare via taxing the hell out of you.
Of course, because the Iraq invasion has worked so well. Why can't they see this?Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are out of touch with world affairs.
Yep... The logical way of doing things is to stay the course no matter what facts or realities get in your way.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are flip floppers.
This is all part of how liberals hate America. Naturally, they prefer the terrorists attack us. Why else would they want us to stop invading countries?Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Do not care about terrorists attacking the U.S.
Well, that's only because we were working with Bin Laden against the Soviets at the time. That was a bipartisan effort, and boy, that worked beautifully didn't it?Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Let Bin Laden get away many times several years ago.
Forget Clinton... Try them for the FDR administration! That commie bastard!Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Should be tried for the Clinton Administration.
Yes, especially Air America and the AARP.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are responsible for terrorist attacks.
Yes, because we know that unrestrained outsourcing gives us a major edge in the world.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are trying to kill America's edge on the rest of the world.
Only if you're on welfare... or wait... maybe that applies to Republicans instead...?Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Directly affect me and my childrens welfare.
...don't forget how Nazies will ride dinosaurs once again too.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Want the gays to be married destroying all moral grounds for marriage.
Exactly... A more compassionate agenda involves increasing the wealth disparity in America and removing individuals' rights while giving corporations new ones.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are out for thier own agenda of personal gain and career advancement.
Yep... That's the only explanation for all these IEDs. Democrats must be smuggling explosives to terrorists. I figure Rumsfeld's dealings with Saddam in the 80s must have inspired them to get in on this business as well.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Have sabatoged the war on terror.
No but Terrorist are the Dems number one fans.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are responsible for terrorist attacks.
Liberal newspapers like the NY times publishing classified information couldn't be helping the enemies plans at all could it?Turquoise wrote:
Yep... That's the only explanation for all these IEDs. Democrats must be smuggling explosives to terrorists. I figure Rumsfeld's dealings with Saddam in the 80s must have inspired them to get in on this business as well.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Have sabatoged the war on terror.
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-30 19:56:26)
Serial killers more commonly vote Republican, but I don't see that as a notable reason for voting Democratic.Kmarion wrote:
No but Terrorist are the Dems number one fans.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are responsible for terrorist attacks.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=51690
I'm curious also, how would the dems like to restrain outsourcing?
It all depends on how you look at it... If the NY Times can obtain classified information in the first place, what does that tell you about the government?Kmarion wrote:
Liberal newspapers like the NY times publishing classified information couldn't be helping the enemies plans at all could it?Turquoise wrote:
Yep... That's the only explanation for all these IEDs. Democrats must be smuggling explosives to terrorists. I figure Rumsfeld's dealings with Saddam in the 80s must have inspired them to get in on this business as well.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Have sabatoged the war on terror.
Obviously the Dems are just as patriotic and would like to see a successful America however it does not look good for this to happen with the opposition in the presidential office. Draw your own conclusions.
My opinion, politicians are spineless all together (For the most part). There are very few you can count on. There job is to sell votes and trying to pin all the failures or success to a single party is not very rational.Turquoise wrote:
Serial killers more commonly vote Republican, but I don't see that as a notable reason for voting Democratic.Kmarion wrote:
No but Terrorist are the Dems number one fans.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Are responsible for terrorist attacks.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=51690
I'm curious also, how would the dems like to restrain outsourcing?
On the second part, you're right that many Democrats are just as fond of outsourcing as Republicans. It's become a bipartisan effort at this point, and our labor doesn't seem ready for it. Sucks to be them...
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-30 20:02:33)
DEMOCRATS SUCK!Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Democrats:
Kill babies.
Want to take away the 2nd amendment.
Want universal healthcare via taxing the hell out of you.
Are out of touch with world affairs.
Are flip floppers.
Do not care about terrorists attacking the U.S.
Let Bin Laden get away many times several years ago.
Should be tried for the Clinton Administration.
Are responsible for terrorist attacks.
Are trying to kill America's edge on the rest of the world.
Directly affect me and my childrens welfare.
Want the gays to be married destroying all moral grounds for marriage.
Are out for thier own agenda of personal gain and career advancement.
Have sabatoged the war on terror.
I completely agree. I think the midterm elections were indicative that the Democrats are currently the lesser of two evils, however.Kmarion wrote:
My opinion, politicians are spineless all together (For the most part). There are very few you can count on. There job is to sell votes and trying to pin all the failures or success to a single party is not very rational.Turquoise wrote:
Serial killers more commonly vote Republican, but I don't see that as a notable reason for voting Democratic.Kmarion wrote:
No but Terrorist are the Dems number one fans.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=51690
I'm curious also, how would the dems like to restrain outsourcing?
On the second part, you're right that many Democrats are just as fond of outsourcing as Republicans. It's become a bipartisan effort at this point, and our labor doesn't seem ready for it. Sucks to be them...
Americans wanted a change no matter what. Even if that change came without a solution. The Democrats didn't win, the Republicans lost if you know what i mean.Turquoise wrote:
I completely agree. I think the midterm elections were indicative that the Democrats are currently the lesser of two evils, however.Kmarion wrote:
My opinion, politicians are spineless all together (For the most part). There are very few you can count on. There job is to sell votes and trying to pin all the failures or success to a single party is not very rational.Turquoise wrote:
Serial killers more commonly vote Republican, but I don't see that as a notable reason for voting Democratic.
On the second part, you're right that many Democrats are just as fond of outsourcing as Republicans. It's become a bipartisan effort at this point, and our labor doesn't seem ready for it. Sucks to be them...
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-30 20:06:33)
Thanks, K. You make a good intellectual sparring partner...Kmarion wrote:
Americans wanted a change no matter what. Even if that change came without a solution. The Democrats didn't win, the Republicans lost if you know what i mean.Turquoise wrote:
I completely agree. I think the midterm elections were indicative that the Democrats are currently the lesser of two evils, however.Kmarion wrote:
My opinion, politicians are spineless all together (For the most part). There are very few you can count on. There job is to sell votes and trying to pin all the failures or success to a single party is not very rational.
Good Discussion Turquoise, gotta go The Daily Show is on .
It's an obvious oversimplification to attempt to make your oposition look bad. It can go both ways. Quite frankly it's childish and only hurts the party you're trying to support.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
I never stated these were my views. The poll asks, is this true. Comprehension brother. Comprehension.golgoj4 wrote:
you sir are a flaming idiot. thank god not all of America is as dumb as you are...oh wait.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Democrats:
Kill babies.
Want to take away the 2nd amendment.
Want universal healthcare via taxing the hell out of you.
Are out of touch with world affairs.
Are flip floppers.
Do not care about terrorists attacking the U.S.
Let Bin Laden get away many times several years ago.
Should be tried for the Clinton Administration.
Are responsible for terrorist attacks.
Are trying to kill America's edge on the rest of the world.
Directly affect me and my childrens welfare.
Want the gays to be married destroying all moral grounds for marriage.
Are out for thier own agenda of personal gain and career advancement.
Have sabatoged the war on terror.
Andrew Johnson was, indeed, a complete idiot. He was also a traitor to his own state.UGADawgs wrote:
Probably Andrew Johnson for his part in the complete screw-up of Reconstruction. Second would have to be Buchanan for letting the whole Civil War happen on his watch.BN wrote:
who do you think is the worse?UGADawgs wrote:
Because you really have to be ignorant of history to think that Bush is the worst. We've had worse presidents with much more lasting effects.
In this day and age of mass media the microscope is on him more than ever.
And all the polls arent showing great things for him.
The majority of people who answered the opinion polls think he is the worst ever.
usmarine2007 wrote:
Appears to be in order.
do you think the person starting this thread wanted a rational debate? i mean, the whole tone of his post is "democrats are the root of every problem in american society." this also implies, though he doesn't state it, that the republicans are the only party that can do any good for the country. this kind of partisanship doesn't do anyone any good at all. if the two parties can't work together, nothing will be accomplished. the fact of the matter is, the great majority of america (including myself) falls somewhere between hardcore democrat and hardcore republican. it's absolutely insane to think that you can be extreme left- or extreme right-wing and accomplish anything. you just divide people.acEofspadEs6313 wrote:
Ffs, why can't any of you damn people let others have an opinion and have a decent debate about it? Everytime I read topics from this forum, it starts with someone stating an opinion, and then a huge flame war starts because one person doesn't like that persons opinion(s).
I'd like to think that they'd start a thread for a rational debate.kilgoretrout wrote:
do you think the person starting this thread wanted a rational debate? i mean, the whole tone of his post is "democrats are the root of every problem in american society." this also implies, though he doesn't state it, that the republicans are the only party that can do any good for the country. this kind of partisanship doesn't do anyone any good at all. if the two parties can't work together, nothing will be accomplished. the fact of the matter is, the great majority of america (including myself) falls somewhere between hardcore democrat and hardcore republican. it's absolutely insane to think that you can be extreme left- or extreme right-wing and accomplish anything. you just divide people.acEofspadEs6313 wrote:
Ffs, why can't any of you damn people let others have an opinion and have a decent debate about it? Everytime I read topics from this forum, it starts with someone stating an opinion, and then a huge flame war starts because one person doesn't like that persons opinion(s).
...but thats the tricky part. Upon conferring with my staff, it has been ruled my earlier statement about 1945 was out of line. I have nothing but respect for the marines. I understand the need for rock solid chain of command. Thats a separate issue that has been wrapped into the war in iraq. I will say this, it sucks the Marines are out there for the imaginary reasons Bush came up with. That means, to me anyways, that I should loudly and vigorously protest and and least speak up.topal63 wrote:
Hey dumb dumb - I will tell you what Marines do... they do there DUTY. They do not make POLICY. They do not PICK the FIGHT - they JUST FIGHT. Comprehend?golgoj4 wrote:
Baseless? I didn't realize that submitting to the king was the mark of bravery.(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:
Your opinion and rant is weak, baseless and nothing but a personal attack on the Former Marine. Additionally, Bush is not a "fucking"idiot. He probably has more intellect than you. And to say that he has "wasted the lives of American serviceman" and on and on... You disclose how you really believe what we are doing. Do you have no understanding of what the US Armed Forces does? Did you ever take US History lessons? You, sir, are VERY out-of-touch. You might want to take a look at you're self. But I can already surmise, that you are to closed-minded at this point in your life to even think--- you might be the one in the wrong, and care to humbly admit it. One day you will
P.S. Since your such an Expert on so many topics, How does a "Real Marine" act? Are you one? Not likely Care to enlighten us, with your own words of wisdom, on this? Please, do!
do I know what the armed forces does? no why dont you explain since your asking dip shit questions
More history classes than you probly?
As far as being out of touch, well, i call it being able to use my brain. But then I haven't been brainwashed like so many here. Military wasnt so successful there...
As far as me being wrong, I dont think that will be proved anytime soon. *Points @ iraq* yeah, thats gonna magically fix itself. Stop co-signing for the king and look at whats really going on around you.
Just doing your DUTY is an ETHIC of incredible proportions. And as far as brain-washing goes, uh so-what even if it's TRUE. Isn't it necessary to turn an ordinary man into an extraordinary man? I think washing out the ordinary is probably necessary!
the democrats did sodomy first and did it better (Dem. Gerry Studds actually DID rape someone rather than having a conversation about it over AOL IM's, and the Dem's let him stay in office to boot)sodomize 15 year old pages-check
Plame was not covert and she was exposed by a fellow Democrat...Armitageexpose CIA operatives-check
they lost power because people got sick of conservatives who are conservative in name onlyfuck up so badly that you lose almost all power in a single election-check
umm...what?associate with closeted, junkie pastors in charge of huge ministries-check
they can't stand up to the president because they agreed with him prior to the war, as did most of the democrats (yes clinton, kerry, gore, edwards, kennedy, pilosi all came out and said hussein needed disarming)not have the balls to confront the president until democrats are in charge of the legisaltive-check
Last edited by Chappy556 (2007-01-31 07:48:46)