BF2S Forums Why are terrorist leaders supporting Democrats in the U.S. Elections?

Source.

Classic, you should work for fox news

Getting the invading forces out of Iraq is the goal of the jihadist. Except the fundamentalist differ on exporting this jihad elsewhere, but consequently this draws much attention to them, vocal minorities always do.

Why do they want people to vote democrat, well as the first source said they see it as the U.S. being tired and wanting to pull out due to too many loses in the region. Now this is a weakness that is pretty well known around the world, one that was made well aware of after Vietnam. So its no surprise they see the change as a win for them so following that logic of course they support those that will come to office and remove such pressure in their region.

Further propagating blatantly slanted things like we will behead you last...simply reinforces the misinformed publics view on that region.

For example we use the term Jihad to describe a person in BF2 running a car with C4 and blowing themselves up and others, but unfortunately this is a twist that has been given by the west. The term means nothing of the sort...people need to understand that , but judging by the way the majority of the people respond to differing views with what people believe to be true i doubt it will happen. If anything correcting people's usage of the term to its proper meaning will sound the bells for that person to be called a pussy, unpatriotic...etc etc

Just like how the commies wanted people to vote for democrats?

CameronPoe wrote:

What a load of cockwater. Don't post 'news' from neo-con opinion sites like worldnetdaily - it ain't trustworthy. Come back with links to said news from respectable sites.

You mean like all your unbiased sources??

I love your attitude, that ANY opinon different from yours is biased and flawed. It serves you well

CameronPoe wrote:

What a load of cockwater. Don't post 'news' from neo-con opinion sites like worldnetdaily - it ain't trustworthy. Come back with links to said news from respectable sites.

Do you have any sources that contradicts my sources?  Or that these people are not saying what they are saying?  Or if what they said was different from what my sources said?  Perhaps there was a translation error that one of your sources can disprove.


Let me also quote my first source further here:

Terror leaders reject Nancy Pelosi's comments on Iraqi insurgency

Many Democratic politicians and some from the Republican Party have stated a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency there.

In a recent interview with CBS's "60 Minutes," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, stated, "The jihadists (are) in Iraq. But that doesn't mean we stay there. They'll stay there as long as we're there."

Pelosi would become House speaker if the Democrats win the majority of seats in next week's elections.

WND read Pelosi's remarks to the terror leaders, who unanimously rejected her contention an American withdrawal would end the insurgency.

Islamic Jihad's Saadi, laughing, stated, "There is no chance that the resistance will stop."

He said an American withdrawal from Iraq would "prove the resistance is the most important tool and that this tool works. The victory of the Iraqi revolution will mark an important step in the history of the region and in the attitude regarding the United States."

Jihad Jaara said an American withdrawal would "mark the beginning of the collapse of this tyrant empire (America)."

"Therefore, a victory in Iraq would be a greater defeat for America than in Vietnam."

Last edited by Harmor (2006-11-04 05:39:06)

CameronPoe wrote:

Well I haven't seen the news item on FOX, CNN, BBC or wherever so I'm having trouble believing that the things were actually said.

I first heard this report last night watching Fox News Special Report.  Here's the article on their site:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,227497,00.html

The above Fox News Article references the World Net Daily article in my original post.

Fox News doesn't count as a respectable site, either

Seriously though, I would THINK that terrorists support democrats even without having it pointed out to me by some right-wing news site...because of the simple fact that none of them really support the War. I don't support it, either - and I'm sure if a terrorist knew that he would love me.

Harmor wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Well I haven't seen the news item on FOX, CNN, BBC or wherever so I'm having trouble believing that the things were actually said.

I first heard this report last night watching Fox News Special Report.  Here's the article on their site:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,227497,00.html

The above Fox News Article references the World Net Daily article in my original post.

Thanks for that!! FOX News, as cunning as ever in trying to remain respectable looking, does NOT actually report the news item itself - it allows the far less respectable source 'worldnetdaily' to do that and then they report that: 'worldnetdaily said'.... yada, yada, yada. It is classic FOX: you can say anything you like on the news, true or false if you precede it with - 'some say...'

Example: A certain group are saying that George Bush has had sex with an 8 year old girl.

The channel is not held accountable for said blatant lie because they are only suggesting it and palming the responsibility for the comment off to unnamed sources, etc. It's opinionews - not news. If the original source were a little more trustworthy then FOX would have made much more of it on their main page and news items.

The item is pure electioneering as well. It's pretty lame that Republicans have stooped to using terrorists to try and garner votes in the upcoming election. Why should American voters care what some cavedwelling RPG-toter says!!!?

PS WHY OH WHY would terrorists be talking to worldnetdaily? Have you even looked at the adverts they carry down the sides of their webpage: Israel is great, etc. etc.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-11-04 06:05:44)

IF they did say that than reason is simple.
IT WILL MAKE PEOPLE VOTE FOR REPUBLICANS.

No one wants to vote the way the terrorist say they should vote.

And the way they see it, republicans in power means less diplomacy and more war. And the more war there is the more non violent muslims they (terrorists) can swing their way.
Make no mistake, both sides are thinking "Long Term". Its foolish to think that all the terrorists want is America out of Iraq. And they would start farming and making sweet 16 birthday parties.

And its even dumber to think that Democrats want to surrender America to terrorists and that all the veterans in the Party dont give a fuck about soldiers and safety etc. I mean how the hell can someone believe those negative ads on the TV.

CameronPoe wrote:

The channel is not held accountable for said blatant lie because they are only suggesting it and palming the responsibility for the comment off to unnamed sources, etc. It's opinionews - not news. If the original source were a little more trustworthy then FOX would have made much more of it on their main page and news items.

Unnamed sources? What are you talking about:

News Organization: World Net Daily
Author: Aaron Klein
Posted: November 2, 2006 9:27 a.m. EST


Quote from Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades:

"Of course Americans should vote Democrat...This is why American Muslims will support the Democrats, because there is an atmosphere in America that encourages those who want to withdraw from Iraq. It is time that the American people support those who want to take them out of this Iraqi mud," said Jaara, speaking to WND from exile in Ireland, where he was sent as part of an internationally brokered deal that ended the church siege.

Are you saying that this interview never took place and the author, Aaron Klein made it all up?  Seems pretty credible to me.

they want you to vote republican revers psychology