power9787
Member
+10|6578
there is nothing with violence in media and the desire to kill in video games feels good
there is nothing wrong with nudity for adults
but nudity for 13 or under is not that great and it won't kill you
if you are mature enough for nudity and then fine is ok for you
word are words they don't hurt you unless you are super religious
they should not censor profanity and nudity in older age  shows, it is for teens and adults
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|6839|Reykjavík, Iceland.
I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.
liquix
Member
+51|6450|Peoples Republic of Portland
I think it's only bad because children are not exposed to nude adults very often in this society. I personally don't want my children to see naked adults, at least until they are masturbation age.
Penetrator
Certified Twat
+296|6504|Bournemouth, South England
Nudity is disgusting and wrong, and should be banned from the entire internet.

Unless it involves hot girls.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6597|132 and Bush

Not wrote:

It's certainly not as bad as letting them play GTA where they can kill prostitutes after fucking em in the back of their Hummer to get their money back.
Indeed... yet the latter is more likely.
If my girlfriend ever heard what they say on "Saints Row"(similar game) she'd kick my ass..

PBAsydney wrote:

I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.
I was climbing trees and shit..lol It's probably a generation gap. Kids went outside when I was younger.. .

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-17 16:39:07)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
LaidBackNinja
Pony Slaystation
+343|6705|Charlie One Alpha
I don't know if anyone mentioned this before, but I think nudity should be more accepted than violence, exactly the other way around from what is the case right now. Why? Here's why:

EVERY person has genitalia. In the course of their life they will certainly see their own, and are very, very likely to at one point in their life see, and have business with the genitalia of the opposite gender. This is natural and perfectly normal. Why then, is it more accepted to show murder, something which hopefully most people will never have to experience themselves in their lifetime, than nudity, something which everybody experiences?
Should it not be the other way around? Sex is an integral part of our lives. In fact, we need it to survive as a species. Killing should NOT be an integral part of our lives and we most certainly don't need it. Why then is killing in movies and games more accepted than sexual imagery?
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
InfectiousShadow
BF2S Resident Bass Player
+45|6427|Washington State, USA

PBAsydney wrote:

I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.
lol unfortunantly i am with you in that age group. a couple years later everyone at my school talks about it sex and porn and whatever...there is no real way from stopping them imho because i know a very large number of kids know what it is...some even have sex already...
LaidBackNinja
Pony Slaystation
+343|6705|Charlie One Alpha

Kmarion wrote:

PBAsydney wrote:

I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.
I was climbing trees and shit..lol It's probably a generation gap. Kids went outside when I was younger.. .
Same here, Kmarion. Porn did not get 'hip' for me until several years later.
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6441|The Land of Scott Walker
Nudity is not bad in the correct context.  Like my wife's nudity when the two of us are alone . . . woohoo!   Sex certainly is natural and fortunately I see most of us agree kids don’t need to see sex and nudity.  Why?  Children haven’t matured enough to understand a mature body.  They understand that their sexual organs function in the bathroom and that’s about it.  When parents find that their kids are the right age to handle the info, the kids should be educated about the sexual nature of their bodies.  That way, as some one else mentioned, their curiosity doesn’t get them in trouble and they end up being perverts.   

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Nudity is associated with the propriety aspect of certain cultures . . . Just mostly tasteless...ugh, I hate seeing beer bellies and ass cracks in restaurants. Think I want to see the whole deal?  And using "caveman kids" as a basis for social comparison to the modern world is also invalid.
Agree.  Beer bellies and buttcrack . . .yuck.

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

How about every other animal in the kingdom is nude along with there own special attributes and acts that we dont neccesarily have to copy.
Exactly, even if one believes we’re animals, we don’t have to act like them. 

Cubanpenguin wrote:

The sad thing though is if we were all allowed to walk around naked and we saw naked woman on TV all the time it wouldn't be nearly as fun when we are finally able to take a chicks clothes off. So if the government wants to censer it, go ahead as long as I can still do it at home.
This is actually a good point.  If full nudity surrounded us every day, it would lose it’s intrigue and special nature. 

Ridir wrote:

On a serious note, nudity is an American Social Taboo due to lobbiest representing over protective parents.  This is the same reason why you could be sued for just about anything, they want to restrict the freedoms you have.  A topless woman is going to do less harm to someone of any age then seeing murder, slaughter, and combat in tv and movies.  In my personal opinion nudity is fine for everyone, but porn and the act of sex isn't for the youngest.
Overprotective parents?  Hmmm.  If you have a daughter someday perhaps you will understand the instinct to protect her.  Safety is a factor to be considered here.  If a girl is showing off a lot of assets they’re much more likely to attract the wrong kind of attention.  I, for one, do not see it as an advance in society that girls from 12-16 are having sex because they're not mature enough to make that decision yet.  I feel bad for them when they're stuck dealing with all the consequences and the horny little guy they just had sex with is long gone.
some_random_panda
Flamesuit essential
+454|6386

Uh...someone gave me Karma with the message
"+ 1 u, u + 1 me, pea....tear...griffen"
As there is no name, sadly I cannot return the favour.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6576|the dank(super) side of Oregon

some_random_panda wrote:

Uh...someone gave me Karma with the message
"+ 1 u, u + 1 me, pea....tear...griffen"
As there is no name, sadly I cannot return the favour.
that's the guys name, pea-tear-griffen
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6705|Oklahoma City

some_random_panda wrote:

Uh...someone gave me Karma with the message
"+ 1 u, u + 1 me, pea....tear...griffen"
As there is no name, sadly I cannot return the favour.
Pea....Tear.....Griffen

http://forums.bf2s.com/profile.php?id=26532
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6363|Columbus, Ohio

PBAsydney wrote:

I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.
I am jealous.  We had to hide a playboy in the woods in order too look at porn at that age.
burton
Member
+9|6415|Da Bay, California
where i live its 30 degrees in the winter and 112 in the summer....clothes would be more of a preference than a rule
{C4C}Phoenix
Member
+8|6360

chittydog wrote:

This whole phobia of nudity is a leftover from the Puritans. Why would it hurt someone to see people the way they were made? Sex is a whole different story though. Kids don't need to see that.
Because some women just need to cover up!!!!!
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6441|The Land of Scott Walker

burton wrote:

where i live its 30 degrees in the winter and 112 in the summer....clothes would be more of a preference than a rule
Either frostbite or sunburn down there . . . ow.
Stealth42o
She looked 18 to me officer
+175|6667
Nudity is bad, baby jesus would never approve.
MT_Androo
Banned
+122|6465|The Suburb at Karkand

chittydog wrote:

This whole phobia of nudity is a leftover from the Puritans. Why would it hurt someone to see people the way they were made? Sex is a whole different story though. Kids don't need to see that.
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|6566|Portland, OR, USA

Stealth42o wrote:

Nudity is bad, baby jesus would never approve.
but mostly naked woman with their hands down their pants are a-okay
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6441|The Land of Scott Walker
Some of you guys really need more lovin'.  Then pictures won't have such an attraction.  Not referring to anyone specific.
D34TH_D34L3R
Member
+48|6812|Belgium
If a kid sees a naked woman or man, I don't think he will think sexually about it..
I mean; boys are running around showing their pennisses to random people because all they know about it is; "I have it and girls don't" ..

IMO;
Nudity (normal nudity, like someone stepping out of a shower, someone changing clothes, etc.) with under-aged children = no problem, 'cause they (normally) don't realize the sexual aspect of it..
Nudity (again normal nudity) with adults or adolescents = not really a problem 'cause I doubt that they will go "OMG WTF OMG OMG!!!!" Of course if they aren't mature enough to know the sexual aspect of nudity, and to handle it..
Nudity (like in porn-alike pictures) with under-aged children = not good.. Their minds aren't yet ready to understand in a correct way what sex etc. is..
Nudity (like in porn-alike pictures) with adults or adolescents = ok by me.. they can handle it..

Of course I'm talking about nudity in places you can expect it or in private.. You won't see me aproving when some guy/girl is walking around naked in a shopping street..

Last edited by D34TH_D34L3R (2007-01-18 07:05:51)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard