Pacific Tsunami Warning 8.3-magnitude earthquake

2007-01-12 22:05:17

#1

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

Wire story from my buddy at the times
You will see it soon
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center issues a tsunami watch for Alaska's western Aleutian islands after an 8.3-magnitude earthquake in the northern Pacific.
AP-ES-0

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2007-01-12 22:05:49

#2

usmarine2007: Banned; +374|6794|Columbus, Ohio

duck and cover

2007-01-12 22:05:49

#3

Mr.Casual: p-n*|3eergogglz; +136|6936|Minnesota eh

Breaking News!

2007-01-12 22:06:56

#4

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

Wait no longer here it is
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070113/ap_ … earthquake

Eds: Waves expected to reach Hawaii about 5 a.m. EST.

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-12 22:07:33)

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2007-01-12 22:07:25

#5

CommieChipmunk: Member; +488|6997|Portland, OR, USA

only Alaska?

2007-01-12 22:07:51

#6

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7147|California

"The agency said waves as high as 3.3 feet"

fail. Even with the force that a swell has, thats nothing

2007-01-12 22:08:01

#7

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

CommieChipmunk wrote:
only Alaska?

no.. Japan Hawaii.. etc

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2007-01-12 22:11:51

#8

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7147|California

NSGS tsunami zones define a danger radius from the point of the quake/slide, all the way down to the equator. So if it was in Alaska; Hawaii, Japan, SP Islands, and the NW coast of the US is at risk

2007-01-12 22:13:17

#9

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

stryyker wrote:
NSGS tsunami zones define a danger radius from the point of the quake/slide, all the way down to the equator. So if it was in Alaska; Hawaii, Japan, SP Islands, and the NW coast of the US is at risk

Well Japan told it's resident to flee the coast... we will see. It's not supposed to hit Hawaii until 5 am est.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2007-01-12 22:13:54

#10

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7147|California

Kmarion wrote:
stryyker wrote:
NSGS tsunami zones define a danger radius from the point of the quake/slide, all the way down to the equator. So if it was in Alaska; Hawaii, Japan, SP Islands, and the NW coast of the US is at risk
Well Japan told it's resident to flee the coast... we will see. It's not supposed to hit Hawaii until 5 am est.

Any word on what kind of quake it was? (subduction, convergance)

2007-01-12 22:14:32

#11

usmarine2007: Banned; +374|6794|Columbus, Ohio

stryyker wrote:
NSGS tsunami zones define a danger radius from the point of the quake/slide, all the way down to the equator. So if it was in Alaska; Hawaii, Japan, SP Islands, and the NW coast of the US is at risk

Awesome. My beach front property in Arizona is going to pay off.

2007-01-12 22:15:07

#12

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

More from the wire
TOKYO (AP) — Japan's Meteorological Agency says tidal level falls 4 inches in Nemuro in northeastern Japan, a sign that a tsunami could hit later.
AP-ES-01-13-07 0113EST

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-12 22:24:54)

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2007-01-12 22:25:02

#13

s()mtingWong: Member; +48|7120

Ya and that sucks cause now i cant play tonight wich i look forward to every friday night. We have a national alarm system that sounds every month for testing, and with me living like a block from the waimanalo beach im afraid i wont hear it and be swept away so instead i wont fcking be playing tonight. Damn only if it happened on a work day.

2007-01-12 22:41:34

#14

Coolbeano: Level 13.5 BF2S Ninja Penguin Sensei; +378|7190

There's a tsunami, and you're worried about not being able to play on a Friday night?

Wow.

2007-01-12 22:44:44

#15

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

Tsunami or not thats a big freakin quake... the one that killed 230 k was a 9.0

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2007-01-12 22:52:34

#16

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|7102|Canberra, AUS

That's about the same size as the SF quake (but I'm not sure which one )

That's a freaking huge quake. But not on the scale of the 2004 one, because the scale doesn't work like that.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2007-01-12 22:54:27

#17

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

Spark wrote:
That's about the same size as the SF quake (but I'm not sure which one )

That's a freaking huge quake. But not on the scale of the 2004 one, because the scale doesn't work like that.

What am I missing? I'm talking about the quakes not the waves.

(Edit: I know there are other factors that come into account with the waves)

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-12 22:55:15)

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2007-01-13 00:54:55