Let a and b be equal to 1. Since a and b are equal.
b2 = ab (eq. 1)
Since a equals itself, it is obvious that
a2 = a2 (eq. 2)
Subtract equation 1 from equation 2. This yeilds
a2 - b2 = a2 - ab (eq. 3)
We can factor both sides of the equation. a2 - ab = a(a - b) . Also, a2 - b2 equals (a + b) (a - b)
So substituting the two into equation 3, we get
(a + b) (a - b) = a(a - b) (eq. 4)
Now divide both sides of the equation by (a - b) and we get
a + b = a (eq. 5)
Subtract a from both sides to get
b = 0 (eq. 6)
But we set b to 1 at the beginning of the proof, so
1 = 0 (eq. 7, the equation discussed throughout the rest of the proof)
This is important. We know that Churchill had a head, but because one equals zero in the equation, this means that he had no head. Also, we know that he didn't have a leafy top, but by the equation we see that he infact did have a leafy top.
Multiplying both sides of the equation (eq. 7) by 2, we see that
2 = 0
Churchill also had two legs, which he actually didn't have. Also, he had two arms, which he also didn't have. Now, by mulitplying Churchill's waist size by that equation, we see
(Churchill's waist size) = 0
That signifies that Mr. Churchill in fact had no waist, that he came to a point.
Now what color was he? Multiply the equation by the wavelength, see
(Churchill's photon's wavelength) = 0
But multiplying the equation (eq. 7) by 640 nanometers, we see that
640 = 0
Combining the las ttwo equations, we see that
(Churchill's photon's wavelength) = 0
Thus, his photon color is orange. So, Mr. Churchill was orange.
In case you are confused, I have just mathamatically proved to you that Winston Churchill was not a man, but infact a carrot. Check my work, it's all valid and sound.
If anything, there is one possible thing you can call me on. And that would be the steps I took to turn equation 4 into equation 5. In order to go between the two equations, I devided by a - b. Since a and b were both equal to one, a - b = 0. I divided by zero, and have gotten the crazy mathamatical statement that 1 = 0.
What's cool about this equation is that I can now prove and disprove any statement in the universe. What's really great about it is the fact that said statements don't even have to be true or false. Basically, math has exploded through logical algebra.
The moral of the story? Zero has the power to destroy logic.
b2 = ab (eq. 1)
Since a equals itself, it is obvious that
a2 = a2 (eq. 2)
Subtract equation 1 from equation 2. This yeilds
a2 - b2 = a2 - ab (eq. 3)
We can factor both sides of the equation. a2 - ab = a(a - b) . Also, a2 - b2 equals (a + b) (a - b)
So substituting the two into equation 3, we get
(a + b) (a - b) = a(a - b) (eq. 4)
Now divide both sides of the equation by (a - b) and we get
a + b = a (eq. 5)
Subtract a from both sides to get
b = 0 (eq. 6)
But we set b to 1 at the beginning of the proof, so
1 = 0 (eq. 7, the equation discussed throughout the rest of the proof)
This is important. We know that Churchill had a head, but because one equals zero in the equation, this means that he had no head. Also, we know that he didn't have a leafy top, but by the equation we see that he infact did have a leafy top.
Multiplying both sides of the equation (eq. 7) by 2, we see that
2 = 0
Churchill also had two legs, which he actually didn't have. Also, he had two arms, which he also didn't have. Now, by mulitplying Churchill's waist size by that equation, we see
(Churchill's waist size) = 0
That signifies that Mr. Churchill in fact had no waist, that he came to a point.
Now what color was he? Multiply the equation by the wavelength, see
(Churchill's photon's wavelength) = 0
But multiplying the equation (eq. 7) by 640 nanometers, we see that
640 = 0
Combining the las ttwo equations, we see that
(Churchill's photon's wavelength) = 0
Thus, his photon color is orange. So, Mr. Churchill was orange.
In case you are confused, I have just mathamatically proved to you that Winston Churchill was not a man, but infact a carrot. Check my work, it's all valid and sound.
If anything, there is one possible thing you can call me on. And that would be the steps I took to turn equation 4 into equation 5. In order to go between the two equations, I devided by a - b. Since a and b were both equal to one, a - b = 0. I divided by zero, and have gotten the crazy mathamatical statement that 1 = 0.
What's cool about this equation is that I can now prove and disprove any statement in the universe. What's really great about it is the fact that said statements don't even have to be true or false. Basically, math has exploded through logical algebra.
The moral of the story? Zero has the power to destroy logic.
Last edited by BigmacK (2007-01-16 16:15:17)