What you and a select few want is not what the public wants.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
The core BF games are more realistic than the BC series, that's what i'm getting at. And yeah, they can do what they want to the game, but only to a point - it's a the public that will have to buy it, so if they don't adhere to what the public want, then they won't so many sales.UnkleRukus wrote:
Every time you post you look like a bigger faggot in the eyes of the lord, god hates fags btw.-Sh1fty- wrote:
tactical ruger mini-14Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I think that guns tend to look better without the tacticool crap on them.
http://cdn5.thefirearmsblog.com/blog/wp … 446l-2.jpg
regular ruger mini-14
http://rifle411.com/wp-content/uploads/ … ini-14.jpg
The only mini-14 I've found in a game was in L4D. It looks like this.
http://www.modelguns-worldwide.com/images/mini14q.jpg
I like tacticool ones better tbh, or the first picture of a regular one I posted above.
http://www.hunt101.com/data/500/7426min14-2.JPG
http://www.har-bar.com/images/682_IMG00 … _Vegas.jpgNo, the core BF games ARE NOT even remotely accurate. They can do whatever the fuck they want to the game, because it's THEIR game, not yours.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
What you guys don't agree with this? I think Nathan has a point (although i couldn't care less what they call the medic, in fact, i'd rather it be called a medic...) The core BF series are fairly accurate war games, the BC series are over the top. I want to see it return to the accurate war game aspect.
Just to let you know Nathan, i read that the weapons will be faction specific, so thats something at least.
So there we go, no need to be such an angry bear.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.