Announcement

Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/nf43FxS
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|4753|Vortex Ring State
Thursday, May 6th, 2010                                                      Trotskygrad/fermatx

Panzerhaubitze 2000 155mm Self-Propelled Howitzer

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/54/PzH2000_houwitser.png/300px-PzH2000_houwitser.png

Weight     55.3 tons (121,914 lb) combat loaded, which is less than UR MOM.
Length     11.7 m (38.4 ft)
Width     3.6 m (11.8 ft)
Height     3.1 m (10.2 ft)
Crew     5 (commander, driver, gunner, 2 loaders)

Designed     1996
Unit cost     US $4.5 million (about 1/2 of Niue's GDP, seriously)
Produced     1998

Primary armament     Rheinmetall 155 mm L52 Artillery Gun(60 rounds)
Secondary armament     Rheinmetall MG3 7.62 mm machine gun
Engine     MTU 881 Ka-500 986 hp (735.26 kW)  <<<< ANOTHER RWF THREAD MAYBE? OH NOEZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
Power/weight     17.83 hp/ton
Suspension     torsion bar
Operational (fuel) range     420 km (261 mi)  <<<< LOLOLOLOLOLOL I R STONER
Speed    
Road: 60 km/h (37 mph)
Off-road: 45 km/h (28 mph)

The PzH 2000 is one of the best artillery systems in the world right now, hands down. It is one of the most automated systems around, capable of loading shells into the gun, laying and clearing the shells without human involvement. The human loaders only must load the shells with the charges. The autoloader allows it to have a rate of fire of a round every 3 second in burst mode, more comparable to that of a autocannon than a 100mm+ gun (Still faster than a musket, biatch). All that in-and out movement has been reputedly formed for lovers of machine porn. If all goes to hell though, the PzH 2000 also has a backup manual loading solution too. (As Vince in shamwow said, the Germans make good stuff) It has Multiple Round Simultaneous Impact (MRSI) capability which means more boom at the same time, and a Phased Array Radar on the front glacis plate capable of tracking shells in sight and adjusting the gun's fire to compensate for wind. The PzH2000 also carries a 7.62 MG3, so it can defend itself against soft targets at ranges less than 1 km or so... Or maybe the Germans added it for lovers of small arms, the people who jack off to gun mags, GALT.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/MG3_Training.JPEG/220px-MG3_Training.JPEG
You can mount it on people's backs too! Bend over, bitch (I'm not TRYING to be politically incorrect here)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/MRSI-trajectories.svg/220px-MRSI-trajectories.svg.png
Diagram displaying how MRSI works.

The PzH 2000 is fielded by Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Greece (contributing to their debt). It replaces the American M109 in many of these. Major selling points include the ability to provide pinpoint (it's a relative term, biatch) accuracy at 40 km, and C17 compatibility. Also, it is being sold due to it's PURE FUCKING BADASSERY, and it's ORGASMIC SEXINESS.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e8/Pzh-2000_inside_of_a_C-17.jpg/800px-Pzh-2000_inside_of_a_C-17.jpg
C17 Compatability
NOTE: The orange wrapping DOES NOT serve as a CONDOM.

The PzH 2000 has served admirably in the hands of the Dutch in the War in Afghanistan. It is used to support ISAF troops when they are attacked, the power of the 155mm shells is often more than enough to destroy an occupied building in 2 or 3 hits.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/PzH2000Munition.jpg/120px-PzH2000Munition.jpg
155mm charges and heads.
The German army will not ship them will bowling balls so you can use them as dildos.

I'm never gonna write one of these damn things again...

thanks for reading

https://www.wookie-clan.co.uk/images/almud132.jpg
And no, fuck you pace51
Sources:
http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/pzh2000.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PzH_2000

Last edited by Trotskygrad (2010-05-06 19:05:37)

alexb
<3
+590|4694|Kentucky, USA

These RWF threads are getting really fucking annoying.
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|5386

alexb wrote:

These RWF threads are getting really fucking annoying.
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|4753|Vortex Ring State

Gooners wrote:

alexb wrote:

These RWF threads are getting really fucking annoying.
Thread is anti-RWF tbh.
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+353|5471|Riva, MD

alexb wrote:

These RWF threads are really fucking annoying.
Fixed
GR34
Member
+215|5299|ALBERTA> CANADA
That Gun is bad ass, 155mm Gigantic!
seymorebutts443
Ready for combat
+211|5349|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|4753|Vortex Ring State
thread is constantly being updated with MOAR LULZ, aka stuff that might get my ass tempbanned.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,003|4112|London, England
Future Weapons did a piece on it:

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,687|5491|Oxferd Ohire
who is the girl in the op

gun looks
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|5222
165233452396/165233452397




Would read again.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|5224
who the fuck decided we were too good for swords

i wanna go back to the days of swords

maybe a shield

and a dagger
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|4753|Vortex Ring State

RTHKI wrote:

who is the girl in the op

gun looks
Some girl that I picked outta rate the girl above you.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+558|5468|Purplicious Wisconsin
Where?

Uzique wrote:

who the fuck decided we were too good for swords

i wanna go back to the days of swords

maybe a shield

and a dagger
Such warfare required numbers. Whoever had larger numbers usually was the victor.

Last edited by War Man (2010-05-06 18:59:23)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|5224
shut up war man you're totally wrong

didn't you learn anything from 300
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,627|4542|Catherine Black

Uzique wrote:

who the fuck decided we were too good for swords

i wanna go back to the days of swords

maybe a shield

and a dagger
ddp+ special attack 40 dmg each swipe
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+558|5468|Purplicious Wisconsin

Uzique wrote:

shut up war man you're totally wrong

didn't you learn anything from 300

War Man wrote:

Where?

Uzique wrote:

who the fuck decided we were too good for swords

i wanna go back to the days of swords

maybe a shield

and a dagger
Such warfare required numbers. Whoever had larger numbers usually was the victor.
Even so, the spartans ended up losing the battle they may have inflicted tons of casualties but they in the end died out, that counts as a loss.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|5222

Uzique wrote:

who the fuck decided we were too good for swords

i wanna go back to the days of swords

maybe a shield

and a dagger
Couldn't agree more. Nowadays war is all about who has more money. Fucking boring.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|5224
the spartans didnt die out after that battle, lolz. they werent dodo birds.

and i disagree with the notion that any combat before the modern period of warfare was merely a matter of numbers.

vikings fucking owned north-east england for most of the medieval period with small warbands. it's not always a matter of technology & scale.

Last edited by Uzique (2010-05-06 19:09:24)

libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+558|5468|Purplicious Wisconsin

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Uzique wrote:

who the fuck decided we were too good for swords

i wanna go back to the days of swords

maybe a shield

and a dagger
Couldn't agree more. Nowadays war is all about who has more money. Fucking boring.
No. It's about who has better stuff, tactics, resources, and manpower. Same reason as it was in ancient times.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|5461|67.222.138.85

Uzique wrote:

the spartans didnt die out after that battle, lolz. they werent dodo birds.

and i disagree with the notion that any combat before the modern period of warfare was merely a matter of numbers.

vikings fucking owned north-east england for most of the medieval period with small warbands. it's not always a matter of technology & scale.
well not if you're raping and pillaging towns of women and children
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+558|5468|Purplicious Wisconsin

Uzique wrote:

the spartans didnt die out after that battle, lolz. they werent dodo birds.

and i disagree with the notion that any combat before the modern period of warfare was merely a matter of numbers.

vikings fucking owned north-east england for most of the medieval period with small warbands. it's not always a matter of technology & scale.
Yes I know tactics. But numbers tended to be the deciding factor. Also, I was referring to the 300 that died.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|5254|so randum
iatl
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|5222

War Man wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Uzique wrote:

who the fuck decided we were too good for swords

i wanna go back to the days of swords

maybe a shield

and a dagger
Couldn't agree more. Nowadays war is all about who has more money. Fucking boring.
No. It's about who has better stuff, tactics, resources, and manpower. Same reason as it was in ancient times.
And how do they get better resources and manpower?

By having loads of money.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|5224
resources, manpower, stuff and tactics/training are all matters of $$$.

america steamrolled afghanistan/iraq because you had more capital investing the war. not because your soldiers were inherently better. better trained, sure. but those are federal/state financed programmes. an aspect of your military-industrial complex. it's not as if your troops were more awesome on the ground at real, manly hand-to-hand combat. give an afghan farmer a scimitar and a us marine a broadsword and that marine chump would get sliced'n'diced.

F A C T.

p.s. war man: more than 300 died in that battle.

Last edited by Uzique (2010-05-06 19:13:16)

libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2020 Jeff Minard