Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6591|London, England
We get it, you're a muslim which means you can't do many things in life, no need to tell us every thread
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5721|شمال

Mekstizzle wrote:

We get it, you're a muslim which means you can't do many things in life, no need to tell us every thread
stfu mek
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5454|Bolingbrook, Illinois
Lol I programmed a bot that breaks even without rakeback. With rakeback I can make around $200 per month. But yeah, it's definately possible to make money in poker.  It's all about expected value. If you play with positive expected value everytime you play you will make money in the long run.

For example, let's say I flip a coin and if it's heads I'll give you $100 but if it's tails you have to give me $75.  You have a 50% chance to win $100 and a 50% chance to lose $75.  Do you take this bet?  I would because on average you win money. If you play like this on poker over a long term, playing 12 tables at a time, you'll make money pretty quickly.
whaaaaaaaaaat
><>
+215|5221
kys
Ultrafunkula
Hector: Ding, ding, ding, ding...
+1,975|6444|6 6 4 oh, I forget

Church
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5454|Bolingbrook, Illinois

whaaaaaaaaaat wrote:

kys
[ ] i like to copy things from 2+2
[x] ig likes to copy things from 2+2
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+794|6655|United States of America
Liquor in the front, Poker in the back.
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|6603

Beduin wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

We get it, you're a muslim which means you can't do many things in life, no need to tell us every thread
stfu mek
whaaaaaaaaaat
><>
+215|5221

HaiBai wrote:

whaaaaaaaaaat wrote:

kys
[ ] i like to copy things from 2+2
[x] ig likes to copy things from 2+2
[ ] kys is from 2p2
[x] kys
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6571|132 and Bush

ruisleipa wrote:

I tend to just wait until I've got a killer hand and then start betting properly, at which point everyone else folds I guess thats not bluffing properly...
Depends on how many people are playing. If I'm at a table with 8 people I'll fold anything that isn't great. Let your opponents take each other out and then your odds of winning are better. You are playing against less hands.

Watch the antes though. Sometimes, after awhile, you are forced to play.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
whaaaaaaaaaat
><>
+215|5221

whaaaaaaaaaat wrote:

its unpossible to win at poker. everyone always loses
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6551|the dank(super) side of Oregon

whaaaaaaaaaat wrote:

whaaaaaaaaaat wrote:

its unpossible to win at poker. everyone always loses
no.
El Beardo
steel woolly mammoth
+150|5691|Gulf Coast

DesertFox- wrote:

Liquor in the front, Poker in the back rear.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6677|67.222.138.85

Kmarion wrote:

ruisleipa wrote:

I tend to just wait until I've got a killer hand and then start betting properly, at which point everyone else folds I guess thats not bluffing properly...
Depends on how many people are playing. If I'm at a table with 8 people I'll fold anything that isn't great. Let your opponents take each other out and then your odds of winning are better. You are playing against less hands.

Watch the antes though. Sometimes, after awhile, you are forced to play.
Still obviously flawed strategy. You have to decrease the total number of hands you play, not changing the ratio of good:bad hands that you play.
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5454|Bolingbrook, Illinois

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

ruisleipa wrote:

I tend to just wait until I've got a killer hand and then start betting properly, at which point everyone else folds I guess thats not bluffing properly...
Depends on how many people are playing. If I'm at a table with 8 people I'll fold anything that isn't great. Let your opponents take each other out and then your odds of winning are better. You are playing against less hands.

Watch the antes though. Sometimes, after awhile, you are forced to play.
Still obviously flawed strategy. You have to decrease the total number of hands you play, not changing the ratio of good:bad hands that you play.
Erm.  Are you really suggesting that someone should pick a bad hand every once in a while? 

If you're talking about a tournament, Google mzone.  Green mzone = play good hands
Yellow mzone = expand your range of good hands a little
Orange mzone = start taking some risks
Red mzone = you're almost dead, play with/go all-in with any decent hand
Grey mzone = go all-in with anything
CanadianLoser
Meow :3 :3
+1,148|6478
read a book > advice from bf2s members
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5454|Bolingbrook, Illinois

CanadianLoser wrote:

read a book > advice from bf2s members
thats from a book dumbass

dan harrington
whaaaaaaaaaat
><>
+215|5221

Reciprocity wrote:

whaaaaaaaaaat wrote:

whaaaaaaaaaat wrote:

its unpossible to win at poker. everyone always loses
no.
wasnt being srs obv

i used to use m, but thinking about it in bbs is way easier imo
CanadianLoser
Meow :3 :3
+1,148|6478

HaiBai wrote:

CanadianLoser wrote:

read a book > advice from bf2s members
thats from a book dumbass

dan harrington
was i talking to you?
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5454|Bolingbrook, Illinois

CanadianLoser wrote:

HaiBai wrote:

CanadianLoser wrote:

read a book > advice from bf2s members
thats from a book dumbass

dan harrington
was i talking to you?
y
Jebus
Looking for my Scooper
+218|5735|Belgium

nukchebi0 wrote:

Jenspm wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Jens, what is your opinion on cards to play pre-flop? I can't really discern a good pattern to use, because a 2-7 off-suit or something ostensibly terrible like that can suddenly become golden with good flop. Though I like folding poor hands, I've been thinking it really makes the most sense to stay in each hand to the flop (provided there is no pre-flop raise.)
the odds to win with 2-7 are so high it's never worth it. Unless there are a ton of people playing and the blinds are low, which, well, is unrealistic.
I'm talking about $.25 or .50 blinds in a 10 dollar game.
It's called limping, don't do it.
=NHB=Shadow
hi
+322|6336|California
play on the tables in real life
globefish23
sophisticated slacker
+334|6294|Graz, Austria
Hehehe!
The croupier is actually a real croupier from Austria and the whole audience at the movie theater was laughing whenever he said something in his awful English.
whaaaaaaaaaat
><>
+215|5221

HaiBai wrote:

CanadianLoser wrote:

HaiBai wrote:


thats from a book dumbass

dan harrington
was i talking to you?
y
10 bucks says youre a losing player. sn plz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6571|132 and Bush

HaiBai wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Kmarion wrote:


Depends on how many people are playing. If I'm at a table with 8 people I'll fold anything that isn't great. Let your opponents take each other out and then your odds of winning are better. You are playing against less hands.

Watch the antes though. Sometimes, after awhile, you are forced to play.
Still obviously flawed strategy. You have to decrease the total number of hands you play, not changing the ratio of good:bad hands that you play.
Erm.  Are you really suggesting that someone should pick a bad hand every once in a while? 
How the hell did you get that from what I said mr rolleyes?
Xbone Stormsurgezz

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard