...without spending 1.8k?
Win!kptk92 wrote:
http://www.treasureislandsweets.co.uk/a … _watch.jpg
The other watch dont really look like a watch that would be worth more than 100$ tbh.
That is an insanely basic looking watch...You may not be able to find one with internals the same quality, but you can find one that looks similar and has the same basic functions for an affordable price....
You just wont be able to keep accurate time for 5000 years with out adjusting it...
You just wont be able to keep accurate time for 5000 years with out adjusting it...
Well point them out to me then. I've been looking for a while now and have no found anything I like as much. And I'm not resorting to Chinese knock-offs.
I prefer Breitling, so no.
Last edited by Dauntless (2008-08-24 16:47:11)
I never quite understand why people want to spend such obscene amounts of money on a time-keeping accessory.
Unless of course to serve the needs of the ego .
Unless of course to serve the needs of the ego .
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Swatch make nice watches at an affordable price.
wah1188 wrote:
Swatch make nice watches at an affordable price.
EE (hats
Is a nice looking watch.... but I couldn't wear one with out owning a vette.i g wrote:
http://www.neweggmall.com/Product/2001476960/product.html
http://c1.nemimage.com/Neweggmall/Produ … 6960-1.jpg
Would just feel dumb.
I always just go for shiny casio's, my current one is
updates its internal clock every 24 hours by picking up a radio signal, makes sure its exactly right.
it was incredibly hard to find a pic of the steel version, most pics are of the newer one thats the rubbery stuff.
updates its internal clock every 24 hours by picking up a radio signal, makes sure its exactly right.
it was incredibly hard to find a pic of the steel version, most pics are of the newer one thats the rubbery stuff.
I like my citizen. keeps good time and no batteries.
or maybe they like nice watches?Uzique wrote:
I never quite understand why people want to spend such obscene amounts of money on a time-keeping accessory.
Unless of course to serve the needs of the ego .
im sure there is some superfluous item that you enjoy spending too much money on....
edit:
citizen, seiko and movado all make some pretty good mid priced watches.
Last edited by Parker (2008-08-24 17:27:02)
ofc it keeps good time its a bloody watchReciprocity wrote:
I like my citizen. keeps good time and no batteries.
A friend of mine bought his for 2000€ and he went to Switzerland to buy it. Dunno hes just crazy about watches.Uzique wrote:
I never quite understand why people want to spend such obscene amounts of money on a time-keeping accessory.
Unless of course to serve the needs of the ego .
most shitty, cheap watches lose or gain seconds or even minutes over the course of weeks or months. good watches don't.kptk92 wrote:
ofc it keeps good time its a bloody watchReciprocity wrote:
I like my citizen. keeps good time and no batteries.
http://www.goldsmiths.co.uk/product.asp … p;pid=7294
Swiss Military has got some nice ones too
http://www.swisscatalogue.com/swisspeak … amp;-find=
Last edited by ebug9 (2008-08-24 17:45:55)
While still staying on that site, all I could find was this one.
Seriously, they have no watches cheaper than even $100. These people sure are taking advantage of their brand name rep, it appears
I don't really like the look, though
Seriously, they have no watches cheaper than even $100. These people sure are taking advantage of their brand name rep, it appears
I don't really like the look, though
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
That's cause its not expensive enough.DesertFox- wrote:
While still staying on that site, all I could find was this one.
Seriously, they have no watches cheaper than even $100. These people sure are taking advantage of their brand name rep, it appears
I don't really like the look, though
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
POUNDS!? my lord...ghettoperson wrote:
...without spending 1.8k?
You can spend a lot more than that if you so wished. 1.8k is cheap in watch standards.Noobpatty wrote:
POUNDS!? my lord...ghettoperson wrote:
...without spending 1.8k?
Now thats a watch!
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Do want.Dauntless wrote:
I prefer Breitling, so no.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.