Announcement

Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/nf43FxS
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|5564|NYC / Hamburg

time to go for 200 bclk
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|5411|Finland

max wrote:

time to go for 200 bclk
u and ur 200 blck... fine I'll try....








:S
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|5646

I'd have thought at 4Ghz you'd be sub 10s easy with the i7's.
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|5450|The Twilight Zone

ghettoperson wrote:

I'd have thought at 4Ghz you'd be sub 10s easy with the i7's.
I think thats a pretty good score @4GHz
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|5646

It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|5450|The Twilight Zone

ghettoperson wrote:

It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
I'd have to OC my E8400 to 4.4GHz to get that score. 10%
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
CrazeD
Member
+368|5670|Maine

ghettoperson wrote:

It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
Indeed.

Plus the E8x00's OC higher.





Can't wait for Phenom II's....
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|5411|Finland

u liek superpi much but think about this:
Core i7 @ 3.8GHz vs. E8600 @ 4.4Ghz with a GTX 295 in COD: WAW for example.... The difference is more like 50% :>

and this is in today's games that are far from optimized to run 8 threads effectively.

edit: and btw I had ease latencies on my ram in that run... I could easily drop 0.25s or more from there...

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-12-27 10:28:05)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|5443|Amsterdam‫
a quick   4GHz one
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/cpu4hz.jpg
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|5450|The Twilight Zone

menzo2003 wrote:

a quick   4GHz one
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … cpu4hz.jpg
superpi
gogogo
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|5443|Amsterdam‫

.Sup wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

a quick   4GHz one
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … cpu4hz.jpg
superpi
gogogo
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/comp/spi4hz.jpg
with unclean vista

Last edited by menzo2003 (2009-01-18 15:37:40)

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|5450|The Twilight Zone

menzo2003 wrote:

.Sup wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

a quick   4GHz one
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … cpu4hz.jpg
superpi
gogogo
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … spi4hz.jpg
with unclean vista
at least go into diagnostic or safe mode
+1
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|5443|Amsterdam‫

.Sup wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

.Sup wrote:


superpi
gogogo
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … spi4hz.jpg
with unclean vista
at least go into diagnostic or safe mode
+1
will do
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
Naturn
Deeds, not words.
+311|5602|Greenwood, IN
I wonder how my E7300 @ 3.6Ghz will do.
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|5411|Finland

CrazeD wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
Indeed.

Plus the E8x00's OC higher.





Can't wait for Phenom II's....
its not a bad CPU for single GPU gamer.... but if u are not GPU limited, Core i7 just EPIC AAZZZRAEPS the Phenom II.

The results are not even funny anymore...
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|5443|Amsterdam‫

Naturn wrote:

I wonder how my E7300 @ 3.6Ghz will do.
13 ish.  I think
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|5450|The Twilight Zone

CrazeD wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

It's good, certainly, but it doesn't seem far off the C2D times for that sort of clock.
Indeed.

Plus the E8x00's OC higher.





Can't wait for Phenom II's....
https://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=91474&stc=1&d=1230247956
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
CrazeD
Member
+368|5670|Maine

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

u liek superpi much but think about this:
Core i7 @ 3.8GHz vs. E8600 @ 4.4Ghz with a GTX 295 in COD: WAW for example.... The difference is more like 50% :>

and this is in today's games that are far from optimized to run 8 threads effectively.

edit: and btw I had ease latencies on my ram in that run... I could easily drop 0.25s or more from there...
Only at really small resolution.

At high resolution, it won't matter as much because the higher the res, the more GPU dependent it is.
aerodynamic
FOCKING HELL
+241|4750|Roma
Do you guys think its worth over clocking an 8 core?
Tried with the AMD3500 once and it almost went terribly wrong.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/8ea27f2d75b353b0a18b096ed75ec5e142da7cc2.png
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|5411|Finland

CrazeD wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

u liek superpi much but think about this:
Core i7 @ 3.8GHz vs. E8600 @ 4.4Ghz with a GTX 295 in COD: WAW for example.... The difference is more like 50% :>

and this is in today's games that are far from optimized to run 8 threads effectively.

edit: and btw I had ease latencies on my ram in that run... I could easily drop 0.25s or more from there...
Only at really small resolution.

At high resolution, it won't matter as much because the higher the res, the more GPU dependent it is.
upto 1920x1200 the difference is huge... unless you have a 30" TFT there....

just go see guru3d's test... if u don't believe me...

hell I jsut post a linky here: http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i7-m … -review/19

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-12-27 11:43:11)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|5646

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

u liek superpi much but think about this:
Core i7 @ 3.8GHz vs. E8600 @ 4.4Ghz with a GTX 295 in COD: WAW for example.... The difference is more like 50% :>

and this is in today's games that are far from optimized to run 8 threads effectively.

edit: and btw I had ease latencies on my ram in that run... I could easily drop 0.25s or more from there...
Only at really small resolution.

At high resolution, it won't matter as much because the higher the res, the more GPU dependent it is.
upto 1920x1200 the difference is huge... unless you have a 30" TFT there....

just go see guru3d's test... if u don't believe me...

hell I jsut post a linky here: http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i7-m … -review/19
Wow, that's a lot better than I thought. I seem to think from what I'd seen when it was first released people seemed to be getting scores close to C2D. I guess I was wrong. People did seem annoyed with how it performed in games though.
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|5411|Finland

ghettoperson wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

Only at really small resolution.

At high resolution, it won't matter as much because the higher the res, the more GPU dependent it is.
upto 1920x1200 the difference is huge... unless you have a 30" TFT there....

just go see guru3d's test... if u don't believe me...

hell I jsut post a linky here: http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i7-m … -review/19
Wow, that's a lot better than I thought. I seem to think from what I'd seen when it was first released people seemed to be getting scores close to C2D. I guess I was wrong. People did seem annoyed with how it performed in games though.
with single GPU the performance is pretty close together. That's why ppl though O its the fail in gaming lololo... but when u add something like GTX 295 or HD 4870 CF there... wonders start to happen. Now you know why I got the Core i7 instead of C2Q.

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-12-27 11:54:37)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|5443|Amsterdam‫
HMMM  tried  4.3GHz   but  my BIOS went loopy
fixed it with a reset Cmos 
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|5460|cuntshitlake

Up to date.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
MECtallica
Member
+73|5501|jalalabad
gawd I hate my mobo, it's booting weird, I guess this mobo doesn't like 230 FSB or something (HTT is corrected and everything, memory auto sets, may have to change timings, but forget that i'll just stick at my 10%)

it WAS running stable at 15% the first boot, I could play games, run diagnostics etc, weird.

tried a +40mv to Vcore too (bios says 1.42V with that much) maybe i'll check out setting my timings right, hmm

**EDIT and i'm totally upgrading to a C2D/C2Q in feb, screw this old amd lol :p

not very OC friendly like those crazy 1.83ghz to 3.0GHZ OCs o_o

Last edited by MECtallica (2008-12-27 16:05:51)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2021 Jeff Minard