AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

God Save the Queen wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

ATG wrote:


The revolutionary guard should of had you do the photoshop.

This ran on the cover of the L.A. times ( minus the obvious clones circling )


http://i36.tinypic.com/dg13c.jpg
They are not the first one to photoshop a picture for propaganda purpose..

I have one example in mind but will refrain from posting it.
talking about all the palestinian propaganda during 2006 are we
No you know i side with the pals and believe everything they report 

Nah its about an event that we are prohibited to discuss here..  An popular organisation decided to use a 60 years old picture on their web site but they decided to add some smoke on it..  Without the smoke, that picture was not having the same meaning.

That's all i'm going to say about that.. i fear the ban hammer.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6610|tropical regions of london
some nazi shit
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


If you really think that he said something ridiculous and naive, you need to get out more.
No, he didn't. GS almost always posts rational views. Your views are ridiculous. You and rammunition should just marry and go for a cruise on the troll boat.

Plus, aren't you the guy that was banned and had a member name saying something like "Ausch88" and then tried to BS us all by saying it was an australian chainsaw company? I guess that explains your current member name. Trying to dig yourself out of a hole that's far too deep, eh?
Man, you are a genius.  Welcome to last year.

And concerning my views, it is your opinion but i think you views are worst.. thinking a third world country like Iran can threatened your national security IS ridiculous.

Go back to watch Fox news, theres a report right now saying that Iran want to conquer the world.
Oh yeah, me, the Obama fan. Total conservative.

ANY country can threaten ones national security. You're saying if a country like, I dunno, Somalia (lol) has a nuke, they're not a threat? It's the government, not the status of the country that is the threat.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6610|tropical regions of london
irans so far away
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|6938|UK
flipping flock of seagulls quit that shit!
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

m3thod wrote:

flipping flock of seagulls quit that shit!
https://img134.imageshack.us/img134/9646/flockfacezd5.jpg

BREATHE IT IN
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


No, he didn't. GS almost always posts rational views. Your views are ridiculous. You and rammunition should just marry and go for a cruise on the troll boat.

Plus, aren't you the guy that was banned and had a member name saying something like "Ausch88" and then tried to BS us all by saying it was an australian chainsaw company? I guess that explains your current member name. Trying to dig yourself out of a hole that's far too deep, eh?
Man, you are a genius.  Welcome to last year.

And concerning my views, it is your opinion but i think you views are worst.. thinking a third world country like Iran can threatened your national security IS ridiculous.

Go back to watch Fox news, theres a report right now saying that Iran want to conquer the world.
Oh yeah, me, the Obama fan. Total conservative.

ANY country can threaten ones national security. You're saying if a country like, I dunno, Somalia (lol) has a nuke, they're not a threat? It's the government, not the status of the country that is the threat.
Ok let's imagine that Iran have the bomb.. what is the difference between Iran and North Korea?
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6610|tropical regions of london
north korea is full of koreans.  iran is full of persians.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

God Save the Queen wrote:

north korea is full of koreans.  iran is full of persians.
You didn't say arabs!!!  ok i have no choice but to give you a karma.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Man, you are a genius.  Welcome to last year.

And concerning my views, it is your opinion but i think you views are worst.. thinking a third world country like Iran can threatened your national security IS ridiculous.

Go back to watch Fox news, theres a report right now saying that Iran want to conquer the world.
Oh yeah, me, the Obama fan. Total conservative.

ANY country can threaten ones national security. You're saying if a country like, I dunno, Somalia (lol) has a nuke, they're not a threat? It's the government, not the status of the country that is the threat.
Ok let's imagine that Iran have the bomb.. what is the difference between Iran and North Korea?
What do you mean? There's no difference. They're both equal threats to the world (if they have the bomb, that is).

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-07-11 09:23:01)

AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


Oh yeah, me, the Obama fan. Total conservative.

ANY country can threaten ones national security. You're saying if a country like, I dunno, Somalia (lol) has a nuke, they're not a threat? It's the government, not the status of the country that is the threat.
Ok let's imagine that Iran have the bomb.. what is the difference between Iran and North Korea?
What do you mean? There's no difference. They're both equal threats to the world (if they have the bomb, that is).
I'm talking about the reaction of your government to the threat.. Threatening military action, sending carrier battlegroups etc..  You decided to TALK to North Korea to solve the issue..  And your goverment don't want to talk to Iran..  why is that?
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6804|Long Island, New York

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


Ok let's imagine that Iran have the bomb.. what is the difference between Iran and North Korea?
What do you mean? There's no difference. They're both equal threats to the world (if they have the bomb, that is).
I'm talking about the reaction of your government to the threat.. Threatening military action, sending carrier battlegroups etc..  You decided to TALK to North Korea to solve the issue..  And your goverment don't want to talk to Iran..  why is that?
Obama does...hence why I'm an Obama fan. I mean, that's not why solely, but it's one reason.

Bush is too full of pride to talk to Iran. Plus, he can't speak properly anyways.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


What do you mean? There's no difference. They're both equal threats to the world (if they have the bomb, that is).
I'm talking about the reaction of your government to the threat.. Threatening military action, sending carrier battlegroups etc..  You decided to TALK to North Korea to solve the issue..  And your goverment don't want to talk to Iran..  why is that?
Obama does...hence why I'm an Obama fan. I mean, that's not why solely, but it's one reason.

Bush is too full of pride to talk to Iran. Plus, he can't speak properly anyways.
Ok +1 for you because you prefer the talking before the bombing. I was under the impression that you were a war lover. 

I like Obama too (Ron Paul is the best) but i did'nt like his speech at AIPAC when he talked about Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel but that's another story.
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6745|Communist Republic of CA, USA

Braddock wrote:

So we're all in agreement...let's go have a cup of tea and some biscuits.
British "Biscuits" or 'Merrcun Biscuits?

https://img259.imageshack.us/img259/5097/biscuit20from20clinton2bg6.jpg

Last edited by Major.League.Infidel (2008-07-11 11:51:56)

kptk92
u
+972|6675|tc_london
America and Iran best start talking soon, I don't want to die at 15
13rin
Member
+977|6746

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


What do you mean? There's no difference. They're both equal threats to the world (if they have the bomb, that is).
I'm talking about the reaction of your government to the threat.. Threatening military action, sending carrier battlegroups etc..  You decided to TALK to North Korea to solve the issue..  And your goverment don't want to talk to Iran..  why is that?
Obama does...hence why I'm an Obama fan. I mean, that's not why solely, but it's one reason.

Bush is too full of pride to talk to Iran. Plus, he can't speak properly anyways.
Obama isn't much better.  Ever heard him go off script?  And what should Obama tell Amiadinnajaket?  Stop supplying insurgents or else?  Stop fucking with Israel or else?  We want to be your friend but...  Come on.  The US does not talk to state sponsers of terrorism.  Iran knows what they need to do if they want to "talk" to the US.  Talks are pointless at this point.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


I'm talking about the reaction of your government to the threat.. Threatening military action, sending carrier battlegroups etc..  You decided to TALK to North Korea to solve the issue..  And your goverment don't want to talk to Iran..  why is that?
Obama does...hence why I'm an Obama fan. I mean, that's not why solely, but it's one reason.

Bush is too full of pride to talk to Iran. Plus, he can't speak properly anyways.
Obama isn't much better.  Ever heard him go off script?  And what should Obama tell Amiadinnajaket?  Stop supplying insurgents or else?  Stop fucking with Israel or else?  We want to be your friend but...  Come on.  The US does not talk to state sponsers of terrorism.  Iran knows what they need to do if they want to "talk" to the US.  Talks are pointless at this point.
What about the states who sponsor the states sponsers of terrorism?

China and Russia supply weapons to Iran and Iran supply weapons to insurgents and Hezbollah.

You should stop talking to Russia and China then.

But you will never do that..  it's easier to attack 3rd world country heh?
GuliblGuy
Zulu son, what!?!
+79|7052|Anaheim, CA

https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3229/2658316482_848d71ed13_o.jpg

Lol the orig and the fake:
https://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd215/kozowh/IranMissiles.jpg
usmarine2
Banned
+233|6057|Dublin, Ohio

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

it's easier to attack 3rd world country heh?
russia lost the cold war babe
CommonSense
Banned
+51|6203|New York

kptk92 wrote:

America and Iran best start talking soon, I don't want to die at 15
I think NYC would be the best place for Iran to nuke, tbh.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

CommonSense wrote:

kptk92 wrote:

America and Iran best start talking soon, I don't want to die at 15
I think NYC would be the best place for Iran to nuke, tbh.
Nobody will nuke anyone.   Iran does not have the capability to send ICBM over the atlantic and they will never give a nuke to some crazy islamist like Al Qaida.  They hate each other.  Don't fall for the propaganda, If something happen, it will be the crazy israelies who will try to bomb Iran and in retaliation, they will receive a shower of missiles. (Those who do not misfire)
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6677|'Murka

m3thod wrote:

flipping flock of seagulls quit that shit!
SAY WHAT AGAIN!
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6677|'Murka

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

CommonSense wrote:

kptk92 wrote:

America and Iran best start talking soon, I don't want to die at 15
I think NYC would be the best place for Iran to nuke, tbh.
Nobody will nuke anyone.   Iran does not have the capability to send ICBM over the atlantic and they will never give a nuke to some crazy islamist like Al Qaida.  They hate each other.  Don't fall for the propaganda, If something happen, it will be the crazy israelies who will try to bomb Iran and in retaliation, they will receive a shower of missiles. (Those who do not misfire)
No, it can't reach across the Atlantic, but it can reach many different US installations in the ME as well as allies in the region (not just Israel). Sure, they may not provide a nuke to AQ...but then again, they might just provide it to Hezbollah. Or JAM. Or the Taliban. They already provide advanced weaponry to all three of them in their various proxy wars.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7096|Grapevine, TX
IRAN MISSILE TEST BLUFF: OLD ROCKETS, BOGUS VIDEO
Fri Jul 11 2008 15:18:02 ET

Many of Iran's claims related to missile tests during "Great Prophet III" war games -- appear to be smoke and mirrors!

The missiles tested DID NOT not have 2,000-kilometer range, the NEW YORK TIMES is planning to report on Saturday.

Iran DID NOT launch a Shahab-3 missile, able to reach Israel.

It was an older missile that was out of production, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE.

And a video showing what appeared to be many missiles being fired -- is actually one missile, filmed from different angles!

NYT's Bill Broad is planning to quote military insiders.

Developing...https://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20080709/capt.cps.myh47.090708202200.photo03.photo.default-512x328.jpg?x=400&y=256&sig=GgMn5yZoxmiidFKIOuKBHQ--

yahoo.com news wrote:

WASHINGTON - Fri Jul 11, 19:59 PM ET
Iran's missile test this week did not demonstrate any new capabilities, according to a U.S. official familiar with the intelligence, and the test may not have included one of the longer-range missiles Iran claims was among those launched.

Iranian officials claimed the tests Wednesday and Thursday demonstrated a new variant of the Shahab missile that had a range of 1,250 miles. Such a missile would put much of the Middle East in striking distance, including Israel — as close as 650 miles from Iran — as well as Turkey, Pakistan and the Arabian peninsula.

The tests drew immediate criticism from U.S. officials. In Eastern Europe during the launches, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the missile tests underscored the need for a U.S. missile shield in the region.

But an independent national security blog, ArmsControlWonk.com, Thursday analyzed video footage of the launch posted by the Iranian government. It determined the missiles were identical to a version of the Shahab missile first demonstrated in Iran in 1998 that has a known range of 746 miles.

In a post called "Same old Boring Shahab 3," it compared the diameter of the missile to its length and found it to be identical to the 1998 version.

Unless the Iranians built a larger missile with the same length to width ratio, dramatically improved the thrust of the rocket or decreased its internal structural mass, the missile could not achieve the range Iran claimed it did. Otherwise, it is the same knockoff of North Korea's Nodong-1, according to the blog.

Iran falsely claimed in February that it launched a two-stage missile that later analysis determined to be a one-stage Shahab missile, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists, a Washington, D.C. arms control advocacy think tank.

"Iran frequently exaggerates the capability of its missiles, and it appears it is continuing that tradition with this week's tests," said David Wright, co-director of the Union's Global Security Program.

The U.S. official familiar with the intelligence said the Iranian tests involved eight or nine missiles — most fired on Wednesday and one more several hours later early Thursday. It was a mix of missiles ranging from medium-range to close-range battlefield rockets. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss preliminary analysis, said the exact models had not yet been decisively determined by U.S. intelligence.

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said the test is being taken seriously, and was an attempt to destabilize the region.

"We don't believe this exercise to have been an illusion," he said Friday. Still, he added, "They were not testing new technologies or capabilities, but rather firing off old equipment in an attempt to intimidate their neighbors and escalate tension in the region. That is not the way to win the trust and confidence of the national community."

Tehran staged the missile tests as a show of strength in response to a recent Israeli military exercise.

An Iranian government photograph showing a cluster of missile launches was apparently altered to add a fourth missile lifting off from a desert range.

"There's no doubt the photo was doctored," said Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation Program for the London-based International Institute For Strategic Studies.

The image, posted Wednesday on Iran's Revolutionary Guard Web site, showed four missiles moments after launch, leaving trails of glowing exhaust and clouds of billowing brown dust.

U.S. officials have also raised questions about the video footage, saying it looks remarkably similar to previous tests.
I dont know weather to laugh or cry. Failed military "strength" of Iran or the $147 record oil price because of the failure, oh wait maybe they did succeed at something this week.. oh ffs
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6465

FEOS wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

CommonSense wrote:


I think NYC would be the best place for Iran to nuke, tbh.
Nobody will nuke anyone.   Iran does not have the capability to send ICBM over the atlantic and they will never give a nuke to some crazy islamist like Al Qaida.  They hate each other.  Don't fall for the propaganda, If something happen, it will be the crazy israelies who will try to bomb Iran and in retaliation, they will receive a shower of missiles. (Those who do not misfire)
No, it can't reach across the Atlantic, but it can reach many different US installations in the ME as well as allies in the region (not just Israel). Sure, they may not provide a nuke to AQ...but then again, they might just provide it to Hezbollah. Or JAM. Or the Taliban. They already provide advanced weaponry to all three of them in their various proxy wars.
You never wondered how come no missile with chemical or biological agent ever landed on israel or against any military forces in Afghanistan and Iraq?  It's not like Iran doent have those kind of weapons..  If something like that happen one day, the entire world will know that the iranians are behind this, and they will be crushed.

Iranians are not crazy, they are providing only conventional weaponery and they will do that until the enemy is removed from their holy land. They want nuclear capability not for offensive purpose but only for defensive purpose..  they have TV you know and they saw what happened with North Korea, how NK was NEVER militarly threathened because they have the bomb.

Is that so hard to understand? it's the same propaganda that made you think saddam had WMDs and you are falling for it again.

Iran will never give a nuke to any militia anywhere in the world.. same reason why North Korea never gave a bomb or stuff for a dirty bomb to any terrorist group in the world..  its because they know they will be blamed for it.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard