My friend has the same problem. I think it has something to do with your chipset or graphicscard. You have a ATi-card right? Its only happening to him when his card overheats!
Search
Search results: 8 found, showing up to 50
But he was not dead. He was found by his commander in a strange hotel in karkand, drinking beer with MEC-soldiers...
Strange, the music is EXACTLY the same as in a video a swedish bf2 page has made www.bf2.se as they tested 1.2. Only the nas and dmx are new.
No thats not what i meant. I mean is he a vehiclewhore and stuff like that!
No thats not what i meant. I mean is he a vehiclewhore and stuff like that!
My friend says that his stats are MUCH better than mine. What do yuo think? Please write it so i can show him, cuz i really think that mine are better. I know its a bit noob to compare stats but please!
ME: [url]http://www.bf2s.com/player/45323571/[/url]
HIM: [url]http://www.bf2s.com/player/63089288/[/url]
ME: [url]http://www.bf2s.com/player/45323571/[/url]
HIM: [url]http://www.bf2s.com/player/63089288/[/url]
Can someone plz answer my questions. Tell me what you thinka bout what I wrote!xRay_swe wrote:
Hi!
I have a question. Why are we arguing about if the towers collapsed from the planes or some explosives?
Shouldn't this thread be about if it all was done by terrorists or by the us government? I mean, if all this has been done by terrorists, and we assume that the towers collapsed from explosives, why didn't the terrorists make them collapse only by using explosives. Do you get what i mean? Or the other way around, if all was done by the government why didn't they only use explosives? If the intended to frighten the people, perhaps its more effective when they crash planes into the buildings?
Lets get back to that if it was done by the us or terrorists and so on and why and what and...
I mean that its really not important if they collapsed from the planes or not. The intrestng question is who and why it was done. And if there were explosives that made the buildings collapse, why they still used planes no matter if it was done by terrorists or the government. Hop you get what I mean.
Hi!
I have a question. Why are we arguing about if the towers collapsed from the planes or some explosives?
Shouldn't this thread be about if it all was done by terrorists or by the us government? I mean, if all this has been done by terrorists, and we assume that the towers collapsed from explosives, why didn't the terrorists make them collapse only by using explosives. Do you get what i mean? Or the other way around, if all was done by the government why didn't they only use explosives? If the intended to frighten the people, perhaps its more effective when they crash planes into the buildings?
Lets get back to that if it was done by the us or terrorists and so on and why and what and...
I mean that its really not important if they collapsed from the planes or not. The intrestng question is who and why it was done. And if there were explosives that made the buildings collapse, why they still used planes.
I have a question. Why are we arguing about if the towers collapsed from the planes or some explosives?
Shouldn't this thread be about if it all was done by terrorists or by the us government? I mean, if all this has been done by terrorists, and we assume that the towers collapsed from explosives, why didn't the terrorists make them collapse only by using explosives. Do you get what i mean? Or the other way around, if all was done by the government why didn't they only use explosives? If the intended to frighten the people, perhaps its more effective when they crash planes into the buildings?
Lets get back to that if it was done by the us or terrorists and so on and why and what and...
I mean that its really not important if they collapsed from the planes or not. The intrestng question is who and why it was done. And if there were explosives that made the buildings collapse, why they still used planes.