sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7015|Argentina
Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of the ruling Hamas group has said he is willing to resign if this will end a Western aid boycott.

I know this will start the usual flaming.  I think this guy wants to negotiate.  For a terrorist he seems very reasonable.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6859|132 and Bush

The US and Europe imposed crippling sanctions on the authority in March because Hamas refused to recognise Israel, renounce violence and respect previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements.

For the record.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6807|Southeastern USA
what good will it do?
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6800|Texas - Bigger than France
I would think it would better if he stayed in power and negotiated, but it wouldn't be ALL good if you catch my drift.
RicardoBlanco
The English
+177|6826|Oxford

sergeriver wrote:

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of the ruling Hamas group has said he is willing to resign if this will end a Western aid boycott.

I know this will start the usual flaming.  I think this guy wants to negotiate.  For a terrorist he seems very reasonable.
He's not a terrorist.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7015|Argentina

RicardoBlanco wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of the ruling Hamas group has said he is willing to resign if this will end a Western aid boycott.

I know this will start the usual flaming.  I think this guy wants to negotiate.  For a terrorist he seems very reasonable.
He's not a terrorist.
I forgot the <sarcasm>.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6703|The Land of Scott Walker

sergeriver wrote:

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of the ruling Hamas group has said he is willing to resign if this will end a Western aid boycott.

I know this will start the usual flaming.  I think this guy wants to negotiate.  For a terrorist he seems very reasonable.
Might have been reasonable if he had offered the same before sanctions.  He's just wanting the sanctions gone.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7030|PNW

Depends on who takes his place, I guess.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7015|Argentina

Stingray24 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of the ruling Hamas group has said he is willing to resign if this will end a Western aid boycott.

I know this will start the usual flaming.  I think this guy wants to negotiate.  For a terrorist he seems very reasonable.
Might have been reasonable if he had offered the same before sanctions.  He's just wanting the sanctions gone.
Is that bad?  I mean the guy wants the best for his people.  The best in Palestine terms should mean having a day without killings.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

sergeriver wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of the ruling Hamas group has said he is willing to resign if this will end a Western aid boycott.

I know this will start the usual flaming.  I think this guy wants to negotiate.  For a terrorist he seems very reasonable.
Might have been reasonable if he had offered the same before sanctions.  He's just wanting the sanctions gone.
Is that bad?  I mean the guy wants the best for his people.  The best in Palestine terms should mean having a day without killings.
yeah that would be pretty cool if the Palistinians could actually try going a day without killing.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6819

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:


Might have been reasonable if he had offered the same before sanctions.  He's just wanting the sanctions gone.
Is that bad?  I mean the guy wants the best for his people.  The best in Palestine terms should mean having a day without killings.
yeah that would be pretty cool if the Palistinians could actually try going a day without killing.
Sure.  Maybe whilst they do that the Zionists could go a day without making profit off of stolen lands.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

Bubbalo wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Is that bad?  I mean the guy wants the best for his people.  The best in Palestine terms should mean having a day without killings.
yeah that would be pretty cool if the Palistinians could actually try going a day without killing.
Sure.  Maybe whilst they do that the Zionists could go a day without making profit off of stolen lands.
By stolen lands, I assume you mean the lands taken by Israel that they were attacked from by the Muslims.


Seems to me there is a lesson in there.

I told Cameronpoe in another thread. It is rediculous to attack someone with a bat, have your bat taken from you, by the one you attacked, then bitch, whine and complain that you had your bat stolen.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6819
Actually, I was talking about Israel.

But let's use your logic.  I would argue it is ridiculous to walk into the house of a guy with a bat, take over part of the house, then complain when he hits you.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

Bubbalo wrote:

Actually, I was talking about Israel.

But let's use your logic.  I would argue it is ridiculous to walk into the house of a guy with a bat, take over part of the house, then complain when he hits you.
If only that analogy fits, but it doesn't. Israel has time and time again been attacked by Arab countries. They have been constanly surrounded and constantly attacked.......It isn't Israel with the reputation of using women and children as shields and conducting warfare while hiding among them, then complain about how many get killed by attacks....

Maybe you care to explain the unprovoked missles attacks by Iraq into Israel during the gulf war in 91.

never mind I am not getting into this with you again.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6819
Are you really as dense as you make yourself out to be?  Did you even read my post?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

Bubbalo wrote:

Are you really as dense as you make yourself out to be?  Did you even read my post?
I kinda thought that  Bubbalo grew up, guess not.

Still trying to sabatage a post with worthless smart ass ramblings, rather argue based on merit.  Nope ain't gunna play Bubbalo, go bug your mom or something.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6819
Let me walk you through this step by step:

You used an analogy which started when land was returned to the Palestinians.

I started mine before that, when Zionist forces took land from the Palestinians.

So, when you talk about someone hitting someone else with a bat and crying, you're talking about Palestinians.

When I talk about someone walking into a house and thieving, and then being attacked, the thief is the Zionist and the attacker is the Palestinian.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7015|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:


Might have been reasonable if he had offered the same before sanctions.  He's just wanting the sanctions gone.
Is that bad?  I mean the guy wants the best for his people.  The best in Palestine terms should mean having a day without killings.
yeah that would be pretty cool if the Palistinians could actually try going a day without killing.
Let me ask you something, if some asshole holding a gun invades your home and puts the life of your family in risk, what would you do?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Is that bad?  I mean the guy wants the best for his people.  The best in Palestine terms should mean having a day without killings.
yeah that would be pretty cool if the Palistinians could actually try going a day without killing.
Let me ask you something, if some asshole holding a gun invades your home and puts the life of your family in risk, what would you do?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#194 … _migration


Yeah I see your point, I bet the Israeli's were plenty scared and pissed off watching the Arab countries do that to them. I see nowwhy Isarael defends itself.

you might wanna read up on who is the agressors in the history of the Israeli/ Arab conflicts before you post any more any more.

also take note that the Arabs turned down a 2 state proposal with Jerusalem as central for both. GUESS who rejected it??



Establishment of the State

Ben-Gurion pronounces the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948 in Tel Aviv.Main article: Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel
In 1947, following increasing levels of violence from groups such as Irgun and Lehi, uncontrollable immigration from Europe and general war-weariness, the British government decided to withdraw from the Palestine Mandate.[13] The UN General Assembly approved the 1947 UN Partition Plan dividing the territory into two states, with the Jewish area consisting of roughly 55% of the land, and the Arab area roughly 45%. Jerusalem was planned to be an international region administered by the UN to avoid conflict over its status.

Immediately following the adoption of the Partition Plan by the UN General Assembly on November 29, 1947, David Ben-Gurion tentatively accepted the partition, while the Arab League rejected it. The Arab Higher Committee immediately ordered a violent three-day strike on Jewish civilians, attacking buildings, shops, and neighborhoods, and prompting counter-attacks organized by underground Jewish militias like the Lehi and Irgun. These attacks soon turned into widespread fighting between Arabs and Jews, this civil war being the first "phase" of the 1948 War of Independence.[14]

Last edited by lowing (2006-11-11 04:31:46)

sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7015|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


yeah that would be pretty cool if the Palistinians could actually try going a day without killing.
Let me ask you something, if some asshole holding a gun invades your home and puts the life of your family in risk, what would you do?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#194 … _migration


Yeah I see your point, I bet the Israeli's were plenty scared and pissed off watching the Arab countries do that to them. I see nowwhy Isarael defends itself.

you might wanna read up on who is the agressors in the history of the Israeli/ Arab conflicts before you post any more any more.
Dude if you want to start a source war fine, but I know history and Israel ain't the sole victim here.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Let me ask you something, if some asshole holding a gun invades your home and puts the life of your family in risk, what would you do?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#194 … _migration


Yeah I see your point, I bet the Israeli's were plenty scared and pissed off watching the Arab countries do that to them. I see nowwhy Isarael defends itself.

you might wanna read up on who is the agressors in the history of the Israeli/ Arab conflicts before you post any more any more.
Dude if you want to start a source war fine, but I know history and Israel ain't the sole victim here.
Well that is a start, by you saying Israel "ain't the sole victim" would mean that it is at least, a victim.

go ahead and source the shit outta me that says Israel started all this non-sense with its Arab nieghbors.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6813
What's the point? He should learn to go without 'western aid'. Take a leaf out of Cuba's book. He's delusional if he thinks him resigning will change things too.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-11-11 04:48:18)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

What's the point? He should learn to go without 'western aid'. Take a leaf out of Cuba's book. He's delusional if he thinks him resigning will change things too.
Do you mean Cuba gets no aid from any other country in the world??? not being a smart ass Cam it is a real question.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6813

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

What's the point? He should learn to go without 'western aid'. Take a leaf out of Cuba's book. He's delusional if he thinks him resigning will change things too.
Do you mean Cuba gets no aid from any other country in the world??? not being a smart ass Cam it is a real question.
Of course they do. But they have learned not to rely on the likes of the US. Hamas could learn a lesson in self-reliance, self-sufficiency and 'personal responsibility' from the likes of the Cubans who have learned to cope with their closest neighbour, the most powerful nation on earth, completely shunning them. If Cuba survived 'El Periodo Especial' - the period after the collapse of the USSR - then Hamas should be able to as well.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-11-11 05:09:00)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

What's the point? He should learn to go without 'western aid'. Take a leaf out of Cuba's book. He's delusional if he thinks him resigning will change things too.
Do you mean Cuba gets no aid from any other country in the world??? not being a smart ass Cam it is a real question.
Of course they do. But they have learned not to rely on the likes of the US. Hamas could learn a lesson in self-reliance, self-sufficiency and 'personal responsibility' from the likes of the Cubans who have learned to cope with their closest neighbour, the most powerful nation on earth, completely shunning them. If Cuba survived 'El Periodo Especial' - the period after the collapse of the USSR - then Hamas should be able to as well.
Ok so they don't rely on the likes of the US, but they DO need to rely on someone.

You were there so  I am in no position to argue with you on the following question: 

From your observations, the people of Cuba oppressed,  or are they free to live to their potential?

I guess another question would be, were you allowed free access to Cuba, or were you allowed to see only what Castro allowed you to see?..Again bot being a smart ass or shitty am really wondering.

Last edited by lowing (2006-11-11 05:23:04)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard