GotMex?
$623,493,674,868,715.98 in Debt
+193|6764

https://img167.imageshack.us/img167/6024/owneddx7.png

I've read all the tech info about how Vista now has some smart method of utilizing the RAM as a cache. Even with all that mumbo jumbo, I just don't feel comfortable with the task manager reporting that there is 12mb of RAM available! It even goes down to zero sometimes. And it feels kinda laggy when loading huge things like BF2 or Photoshop or my Dreamweaver projects. But I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and say it's cause it's just RC2.

Still, I hope all of you planning on upgrading have at least 2gigs if you want Vista to run nice and smooth.
GR34
Member
+215|6546|ALBERTA> CANADA
so it basicly took yer ram and gave it to microsoft over the inter net sweet iam going to c if i can steal some 1s 7950gx2 that way

Last edited by GR34 (2006-10-11 19:39:43)

=DBD=TITAN126
Member
+5|6784
Finally a way to pirate hardware!
lavadisk
I am a cat ¦ 3
+369|6831|Denver colorado
A kid tryed to download ram of the internet.. one of my friends.. and he asked whats a good disk defragmentor to dl.

I'm REALLY supprised his computer didnt blow up.
claor
Member
+39|6416|Australia
lol tried to download ram ha ha
Jbrar
rawr
+86|6543|Winterpeg, Canada
my next rig's gonna have 4 gigs of ram, just for vista if this is the case.
J3ST3R
Member
+59|6514|Vancouver, Canada
Vista is a whore
HW--CHOPPER
Member
+22|6680
Windows Stole My Sanity


BUT NOT MY MONEY:D

Last edited by HW--CHOPPER (2006-10-11 21:24:06)

MECtallica
Member
+73|6505|jalalabad
lawl, youre going to need 16gb to even show it as 256mb
LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|6564|British Columbia, Canada
You got Jacked.
Twist
Too old to be doing this sh*t
+103|6524|Little blue planet, milky way
OMFG !!!!

Thiks is like the umteenth time Microsoft is asking us to QUADRUPLE our memory size AGAIN....

In case anyone wonders,
XP needs around 512MB (a quater of the 2 GB vista apparently needs)
windows NT/98/2000 needs around 64/128 MB of mem
Windows 95 could run on 16-32 MB !
Windows 3.11 could run on 4 MB
MS-DOS could run on 1 MB !!!!!!!!

When MS windows 3.11 was released, it was like 11 1.44 disks, or something like that. When unpacking/installing it took up almost 30-40 MB of diskspace, and robbed you of a couple of MB of mem. you'd pretty much need 4 MB to make things run smoothly, as 1-2 MB would just be eaten by windows itself.

What I did (along with some friends), was to code our OWN fucking windows. We managed to fit ours onto a SINGLE 1.44 disk. Installed it took up about 4-5 MB of space, it would run on a single MB of memory, and never even TOUCH your base 640 KB (well, except for the pointer to the extended memory). And our version CRASHED less, it was faster, and it had no problems with 32 bit once that started emerging. All windows programs we tested ran FINE on our version.
IMO that shows microsoft are pretty damed shitty programmers, and their project managers dont know SHIT about programming and computers. And this time around they've even had a couple of extra YEARS for testing !
I'll NOT be buying that FILTH if I can avoid it !

Linux FTW !
MuseSeeker
2142 Soldier: Behenaut
+110|6776|EUR

GR34 wrote:

so it basicly took yer ram and gave it to microsoft over the inter net sweet iam going to c if i can steal some 1s 7950gx2 that way
Steal some grammar while your at it.

Thats Vista Beta, for you.
SkoobyDu
'CLICK JOIN NOW'... OK lets go... BOOM!!!! =FFS=
+120|6562|Cheshire, UK
To be honest I'm not surprised as its not OFFICIALLY released yet and still in BETA.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard