i find that i have a very soviet-like doctrine when commanding. that is, i reinforce success and leave the unsuccessful to their doom. the reasons are simple - if a squad can achieve some objective, then they likely can do it again and thus are worth resupplying or supporting in some fashion.
this isn't an absolute, of course, with battle being such a fluid situation, and i'll always try to support as many troops as possible. but with larger games your attention and resources simply aren't enough to cover everyone - you will have to prioritise. and the elite troops get priority.
the problem with this is elite troops don't necessarily need your help. they are often good enough to achieve the objective alone. hopefully, by giving them extra support, i can keep the elite troops alive longer and enable them to do more than normal. less skilled players, meanwhile, may need the support a lot more, but they are more likely to fail even after i've expended assets on them, so i tend to limit the level of support i give to them.
i wonder, do other commanders follow a similar approach? or are you more inclined to give help to those in distress and leave your best units to manage on their own?
Last edited by Krappyappy (2005-09-01 09:01:08)