BF2S Forums I hate people who think they're better than you... because of rank....

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

Kniero wrote:

Uh, were I using a dictionary, I wouldn't have misspelled Grecian. Funny though that you call me an idiot for misspelling a cultural-specific term, because really, who the hell is to know? But, sure is irony that I made the statement I did and then misspelled Grecian.

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

No offense Xietsu, but I came to the realization that your post is full of linguistic masturbation, and I find it hard to follow your point concisely.

With all of that put aside, I can go on to point out just how wrong you are in your opinion of my "ramblings" is incorrect. Really, find a part that lacks coherence in any way. Your initial response was total idiocy. You can't follow a point through few words when the idea at hand is much more expansive. True misuse of the term concise. Who the fuck is the one who needs to be using a "Merriam-Websiter" here? You.

Main Entry: con·cise
Pronunciation: k&n-'sIs
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin concisus, from past participle of concidere to cut up, from com- + caedere to cut, strike
1 : marked by brevity of expression or statement : free from all elaboration and superfluous detail.
2 : cut short : BRIEF
- con·cise·ly adverb
- con·cise·ness noun
synonyms CONCISE, TERSE, SUCCINCT, LACONIC, SUMMARY, PITHY, COMPENDIOUS mean very brief in statement or expression. CONCISE suggests the removal of all that is superfluous or elaborative <a concise description>. TERSE implies pointed conciseness <a terse reply>. SUCCINCT implies the greatest possible compression <a succinct letter of resignation>. LACONIC implies brevity to the point of seeming rude, indifferent, or mysterious <an aloof and laconic stranger>. SUMMARY suggests the statement of main points with no elaboration or explanation <a summary listing of the year's main events>. PITHY adds to SUCCINCT or TERSE the implication of richness of meaning or substance <a comedy sharpened by pithy one-liners>. COMPENDIOUS applies to what is at once full in scope and brief and concise in treatment <a compendious dictionary>.

Guess who's the big fucking moron. Go kill yourself etc etc.

Again, this is a BF2 forum, you aren't writing a fucking university paper. There is a certain lingo (dumbed down or not) that will get your point across much clearer than trying to write a thesis on a fucking video game.  A god damn speech loaded with bullshit is not appropriate. Several people have indicated you are full of shit and should shut the fuck up. Please follow their advice before you make a bad name for yourself on these boards (my advice).

Mhmm...because quoting the dictionary definition of a word magically justifies your totally idiotic sentence? I write what, 4 paragraphs, and make no errors that are of any detriment to the actual meaning of my focus, yet you write one sentence and you have trouble making a "clear and concise" point about your inability to understand my reply to this thread. Gee' Agamemnar, instead of arguing for a lost cause, why not just realize you said something stupid and change it? Would it have made sense if you said "I'm not picking up on any concise point throughout your message"? Yes. Would you have had any logical support? No. Truly though, how can you "find it hard to follow a point concisely"? How the fuck do you follow another's argument "briefly and without superfluous detail"? That just isn't a valid approach for someone trying to "follow a point".

You're describing how you are trying to follow and identify my main point, not the distinguishments of my argument. Your attempts at the comprehension of said topic can't be described using the word "concisely" because it makes no fucking sense to describe your inability to famliarize yourself with my ideas (with brevity, of course) when no correlation is present. Seriously, to say there is is, again, pure idiocy. You make an assanine comment about my response, and then say you you're having trouble understanding it in brevity. Usually, the point of feedback is to relate SOMEWHERE to SOME previous message. You say total bullshit, provide no support, and then somehow see it fit to substantiate your claims with the the backing of more idiots who are having the same issue as you (understanding "fairly simple" [who knows with these guys] descriptions and analysis).

=O,
Kniero

(P.S. If you haven't even taken the time to read my introductory response, then you have no place replying in this thread about anything having to do, specifically, with me. Should you then continue to still construct replies directed towards me, the only thing you will be doing is providing the symbols of your naivety and ignorance.)

(P.S.#2. Editted for paragraph form for reading pansies' convenience.)

Last edited by Kniero (2005-12-10 15:57:57)

Kniero wrote:

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

Kniero wrote:

Uh, were I using a dictionary, I wouldn't have misspelled Grecian. Funny though that you call me an idiot for misspelling a cultural-specific term, because really, who the hell is to know? But, sure is irony that I made the statement I did and then misspelled Grecian.


With all of that put aside, I can go on to point out just how wrong you are in your opinion of my "ramblings" is incorrect. Really, find a part that lacks coherence in any way. Your initial response was total idiocy. You can't follow a point through few words when the idea at hand is much more expansive. True misuse of the term concise. Who the fuck is the one who needs to be using a "Merriam-Websiter" here? You.

Main Entry: con·cise
Pronunciation: k&n-'sIs
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin concisus, from past participle of concidere to cut up, from com- + caedere to cut, strike
1 : marked by brevity of expression or statement : free from all elaboration and superfluous detail.
2 : cut short : BRIEF
- con·cise·ly adverb
- con·cise·ness noun
synonyms CONCISE, TERSE, SUCCINCT, LACONIC, SUMMARY, PITHY, COMPENDIOUS mean very brief in statement or expression. CONCISE suggests the removal of all that is superfluous or elaborative <a concise description>. TERSE implies pointed conciseness <a terse reply>. SUCCINCT implies the greatest possible compression <a succinct letter of resignation>. LACONIC implies brevity to the point of seeming rude, indifferent, or mysterious <an aloof and laconic stranger>. SUMMARY suggests the statement of main points with no elaboration or explanation <a summary listing of the year's main events>. PITHY adds to SUCCINCT or TERSE the implication of richness of meaning or substance <a comedy sharpened by pithy one-liners>. COMPENDIOUS applies to what is at once full in scope and brief and concise in treatment <a compendious dictionary>.

Guess who's the big fucking moron. Go kill yourself etc etc.

Again, this is a BF2 forum, you aren't writing a fucking university paper. There is a certain lingo (dumbed down or not) that will get your point across much clearer than trying to write a thesis on a fucking video game.  A god damn speech loaded with bullshit is not appropriate. Several people have indicated you are full of shit and should shut the fuck up. Please follow their advice before you make a bad name for yourself on these boards (my advice).

Mhmm...because quoting the dictionary definition of a word magically justifies your totally idiotic sentence? I write what, 4 paragraphs, and make no errors that are of any detriment to the actual meaning of my focus, yet you write one sentence and you have trouble making a "clear and concise" point about your inability to understand my reply to this thread. Gee' Agamemnar, instead of arguing for a lost cause, why not just realize you said something stupid and change it? Would it have made sense if you said "I'm not picking up on any concise point throughout your message"? Yes. Would you have had any logical support? No. Truly though, how can you "find it hard to follow a point concisely"? How the fuck do you follow another's argument "briefly and without superfluous detail"? That just isn't a valid approach for someone trying to "follow a point". You're describing how you are trying to follow and identify my main point, not the distinguishments of my argument. Your attempts at the comprehension of said topic can't be described using the word "concisely" because it makes no fucking sense to describe your inability to famliarize yourself with my ideas (with brevity, of course) when no correlation is present. Seriously, to say there is is, again, pure idiocy. You make an assanine comment about my response, and then say you you're having trouble understanding it in brevity. Usually, the point of feedback is to relate SOMEWHERE to SOME previous message. You say total bullshit, provide no support, and then somehow see it fit to substantiate your claims with the the backing of more idiots who are having the same issue as you (understanding "fairly simple" [who knows with these guys] descriptions and analysis).

=O,
Kniero

(P.S. If you haven't even taken the time to read my introductory response, then you have no place replying in this thread about anything having to do, specifically, with me. Should you then continue to still construct replies directed towards me, the only thing you will be doing is providing the symbols of your naivety and ignorance.)

LOL, you need to go back to English 101 my friend... You are using 'thesaurus' words out of context.  2 of your sentences do not make any sense (Just to clue you in, a synonym implies the same meaning but does not imply that they are both in the same context).

Ok? Bye.

Kniero wrote:

Mhmm...because quoting the dictionary definition of a word magically justifies your totally idiotic sentence? I write what, 4 paragraphs, and make no errors that are of any detriment to the actual meaning of my focus, yet you write one sentence and you have trouble making a "clear and concise" point about your inability to understand my reply to this thread. Gee' Agamemnar, instead of arguing for a lost cause, why not just realize you said something stupid and change it? Would it have made sense if you said "I'm not picking up on any concise point throughout your message"? Yes. Would you have had any logical support? No. Truly though, how can you "find it hard to follow a point concisely"? How the fuck do you follow another's argument "briefly and without superfluous detail"? That just isn't a valid approach for someone trying to "follow a point". You're describing how you are trying to follow and identify my main point, not the distinguishments of my argument. Your attempts at the comprehension of said topic can't be described using the word "concisely" because it makes no fucking sense to describe your inability to famliarize yourself with my ideas (with brevity, of course) when no correlation is present. Seriously, to say there is is, again, pure idiocy. You make an assanine comment about my response, and then say you you're having trouble understanding it in brevity. Usually, the point of feedback is to relate SOMEWHERE to SOME previous message. You say total bullshit, provide no support, and then somehow see it fit to substantiate your claims with the the backing of more idiots who are having the same issue as you (understanding "fairly simple" [who knows with these guys] descriptions and analysis).

=O,
Kniero

(P.S. If you haven't even taken the time to read my introductory response, then you have no place replying in this thread about anything having to do, specifically, with me. Should you then continue to still construct replies directed towards me, the only thing you will be doing is providing the symbols of your naivety and ignorance.)

I actually read this one post of yours (didn't bother with the rest) because I wanted to see how stupid you were.

Superfluous means Beyond what's required.  Superfluous detail means you put in a huge amount of filler just to prove a point that could have taken 2 or 3 sentences.  Therefore, it's hard to follow your point when you don't use any paragraphs WHATSOEVER, and you just make the same point 4 or 5 times.  If you're so bad at English, when it's obviously your primary language, I can only dream as to how bad you are at other things, like BF2, or the opposite sex.

why are we having an english discussion in the bf2 forums? God, find something else to do.

trepid_jesse wrote:

Who's tryin' to kill you Mr. Doughnut-head Man? I dunno, but he better not!

Wayne's World rocks 

Amen!  I played against an armor whore for a while, he kept coming to the server I play in.  A sergeant major (no surprise)

He was just such a douche, on TS and VoiP and chat... he thought he was better than everyone else.  Most tank whores I meet and total douches.

Please.  This guy had the excuse that he was "Covering while his team took the flag" so I said "...So why isn't it taken?"

That shut him up for a while.

Kriznik wrote:

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

Report him to EA immidiately. He will get his account banned.

tell me one thing : what do you give when you report EA this guy? will you masturbate for hours? ....

come on! everyone plays as he wants, so let him alone and take care about yourself

he pay for this game and plays as he knows ... when he is satisfied with score which he have .. OK who cares?

True, what do you expect EA to do? Give you the highest rank and a special medal:

EA Reporter Medal

requirements:

IAD: wasting your time looking through peoples stats and reporting them to EA.
       Report 5 people in one day.
       1 report in total

Hey, sorry you guys are missing my bootyful messages in this thread, just have been too lazy to go to my favorites and like...read all the new BS you people try and put over on yourselves. To the guy that thinks I'm trying to impress people by busting an "intellectual facade", you are mistaken, and, like so many others, plagued by the idiocy of inference. The answer is simple, and it is that when I'm making an argument, I like it to be close to the "best" it can possibly be. Also, to all of you idiots who actually think I use a thesaurus, you're also part of that chunk of people plagued by the idiocies of inference. I truly didn't use a thesaurus at all when making my first post. I just see it funny that all of you take a stand against me, and then provide no support. Telling of your ignorance I might say.

I also find it somehow confusing that all of you are totally oblivious to anything mentioned in my main response for this thread. Really...are you all that inept in the ways of logic? Gilgalad, what you said is complete crap dude. I'm just a "lowly armor whore"? Did you even READ THE SECOND FUCKING PAGE? In case you didn't know, that's where you can find my defense to all of these peoples' bullshit allegations. Redfiercare, really, did you miss my first post too? HOW THE FUCK DO YOU DO THAT? That post is paragraphed for your reading convenience. But come on, how fucking big of a difference can paragraphs make? Are you guys some kind of weird ass reading pansies? Here, I'll go back and paragraph that reply of mine you whined about.

And, to cover that idiot Zeler, I'd like to point out how you can't even a maintain a 1-1 kill-to-death ratio with your weapons on ground. You're a nub, you most likely suck fucking ass in-game, and you'd probably get owned by me by a longshot, and then some. Is everyone here really this oblivious? The initial "Kniero basher" even gave the main server I frequent and I still haven't even seen any of you fucking idiots. Where in the hell are you all? Anyways, the only reason armor is so effective is because, on public server, that layer of skill found in clans called organization really can have an impact. You can stop any enemy armor influx if you simply make a squad hell-bent on taking out tanks. Simply make a Medic squad leader,and then follow up with up to 3 Anti-Tank units and a Spec. Op. or two.

Aside from that, I'd also like to point out that making it a point to simply join my favorite server (with a team) only so you can "ruin my playing experience" is extremely fucking sad. For one, you can only go as far as to limit my vehicle usage, and for two, anyone can take out a single person if they form a team and make however sucky of a concentrated effort the might have. There is no pride in that, I would say. But hey, if you'd like to be a snobbish little bitch about stupid crap, then by all means, run wild. It's just retarded that so many people find it key in the opinion-making process to rely on assumption (relative to my playstyle, in this case). I thought humans were smarter than that.

Your Wubble Bear,
Kniero

(P.S. I wub jooz <3)

Phew!  Can't believe I read all that shit (and stayed awake)!  I think I just discovered energy sources that will make fossil fuels obsolete....