I WANT THIS GAME!!!!
Ive been playing the demo and that runs out after an hours play.
Ive been playing the demo and that runs out after an hours play.
Last edited by [E.F.L]Airwolf (2006-09-27 05:18:46)
If by game, you mean "not like bf2", then yes it's definatly a faggot. But alot of the people that play BF2 probably won't even touch a game that has the word "Simulator" in it.doneyone wrote:
fuck this game, its gay
uh link please? thanks.[E.F.L]Airwolf wrote:
I've also had a look at this game. Looks pretty damn sweet tbh!
Looking at minimum sys. reqs. now... Yup, should be able to run it
Last edited by Sandriatinhi (2006-09-27 05:51:31)
Sameghettoperson wrote:
I have the demo, which is good fun, however, you will want a very good rig to run it well, as it runs horribly on my computer. (P4 3.6 Ghz with a 6600)
Last edited by R3v4n (2006-09-27 18:22:46)
I'm someone who likes most anything other then mmo's and I have to agree. While some of the gfx are good like water and some objects the terrain still looks like total shit and the objectives are boring as fuck.doneyone wrote:
fuck this game, its gay
Have you checked out the Offical Site? They have Before and after shots of the Terrain and they look A HELL OF A LOT BETTER.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
I'm someone who likes most anything other then mmo's and I have to agree. While some of the gfx are good like water and some objects the terrain still looks like total shit and the objectives are boring as fuck.doneyone wrote:
fuck this game, its gay
Last edited by R3v4n (2006-09-27 18:32:44)
Last edited by TheDoctor (2006-09-27 18:31:44)
you have an opinon, but please make it constructive.doneyone wrote:
fuck this game, its gay
Thats fine you can have an opinion, here are some nice screen shots for every one.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
I had the demo and it totally looks like shit when you get anywhere near it and thats at max settings. Unless they improve them in retail or something they can take glamour shots allday I know it looks like shit.
Last edited by R3v4n (2006-09-27 18:43:52)
they may have better resolution to the scenery in more popular areas where more of the players will fly like cities and around Major airports.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
I had the demo and it totally looks like shit when you get anywhere near it and thats at max settings.
Also they did render the whole World.....TheDoctor wrote:
they may have better resolution to the scenery in more popular areas where more of the players will fly like cities and around Major airports.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
I had the demo and it totally looks like shit when you get anywhere near it and thats at max settings.
Man i can only imagine......stryyker wrote:
Imagine what it would look like with 2 DX10 cards and a Conroe..
/drools
Last edited by R3v4n (2006-09-27 19:23:55)
From the website blurb wrote:
Flight Simulator + Combat Flight Simulator + Destructable Buildings + Multiplayer = 9/11 Scramble Mission!
Team A: As soon as the planes go deviate from course or switch off their transponders to scramble your F-16's to intercept the hijacked planes. Try and bring those muthas down away from populated areas, as your team scores on KDR. If you shoot down all the planes, the enemy will score nothing.
Team B: You must get those planes through at all costs. You know a couple of radar blackspots to sneak up, and have a few tricks up your sleeve using the lack of transponder to confuse air traffic control. You have a number of targets to choose from, but will Team A work out which one in time? You'll be scored on KDR, so if you get all the planes through the enemy team will score nothing.
This 32 player scenario is balanced 13 Team A players to 19 Team B by design, and you must have at least 3 air traffic controllers on Team A to monitor things from the ground.
I didn't know that games had sexual preferences.doneyone wrote:
fuck this game, its gay