your sig is the funniest thing i think ive seen.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
wow, die in a fire you retard
Last edited by DirtyMexican (2006-09-25 17:50:06)
Topic closed
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Using unlocks is equivalent to cheating
THe aim of the game is to get ranked and gain unlocks, the aim of call of duty is to kill enemy and win, so if i was to play cod should i aim to lose all the time b/c winning is the same as cheating and having an aimbot? jesus christ, where do these people come from and better still why do the bf2s moderators allow such stupid ass posts, grow up and post something worthwhile! like, im so crap please someone explain why im such a noob and a cunt and want to whine about unlocks!
Because this isn't even an argument. The unlocks aren't an unfair advantage.Noop-Ni wrote:
Still not seeing any reasons why one unfair advantage is legitimate while another isn't.
Come on, humour me. Just one reason and I'll be happy. Just one.
lol..........flame on.....
See my editNoop-Ni wrote:
Still not seeing any reasons why one unfair advantage is legitimate while another isn't.
Come on, humour me. Just one reason and I'll be happy. Just one.
THE PEOPLE THAT MADE THIS GAME PUT THEM IN THE GAME RETARDNoop-Ni wrote:
Still not seeing any reasons why one unfair advantage is legitimate while another isn't.
Come on, humour me. Just one reason and I'll be happy. Just one.
That the most stupid thing i have heard on these forums!
he just got owned
ea put unlocks in hackers put cheats in, work out which one of the 2 is fairest then get back to me, better still get back to school, ya learn a lot there, fool boy
I have an idea. You could always pickup a kit to use unlocks. Therefore you don't have to buy an expansion to use unlocks. Don't be a fucktard.
And J10s are unfair over f35s. Who gives a shit. Things are unbalanced to be more fun.Noop-Ni wrote:
Still not seeing any reasons why one unfair advantage is legitimate while another isn't.
Come on, humour me. Just one reason and I'll be happy. Just one.
It's not cheating if is isnt covered by the ROE. Or... Its not cheating since everyone who bought SF and AF and EF got the retroactive unlocks. That leveled the playing field. Unlocks have been there since days one everyone has the chance to earn them. Also everyone can kill someone and steal their kit and use the unlocks that they dont even have access to in the game (through their own unlocks)Noop-Ni wrote:
Still not seeing any reasons why one unfair advantage is legitimate while another isn't.
Come on, humour me. Just one reason and I'll be happy. Just one.
BTW I should get some karma for this...Specifically the non flaming part.
Unlocks aren't GOD unless you suck, i use unlocks and have been killed with every default wep there is.
It sounds more like he is trying to justify using his new aimbot program. If you really think there is no difference between aimbots and unlocks, then you sir should leave us no-life nerds to our fun game and you should go play football and get girls and stuff. But just for your sake, the difference is aimbots are unfair because they are not legally accessible by everyone playing the game. Thats why unlocks are a fair advantage, and aimbots are not.
You've already proven that point wrong by ignoring every single valid reason and going on your merry, blind, way.Noop-Ni wrote:
Come on, humour me. Just one reason and I'll be happy. Just one.
i play medic quite alot as i play teamwork, i used paddles of death alot too, maybe i shouldnt, dont wanna offend the conscientious unlock objectoer......*lays paddles down and walks slowly backwards with head bowed*.......
How could you even compare unlocks to aimbots? Unlock is another gun. Aimbot shoots people for you. WTF! WTFUCK!!!!!!
is he flamed enough yet or do we have more for this arsehole?
Havent even lit the flame yet[=][=]DADDYOFDEATH wrote:
is he flamed enough yet or do we have more for this arsehole?
Hmm. I'm thinkin' not everyone understands how unlocks are an advantage. I'll spell it out.
Now, there are stock guns and there are unlocks. The unlocks generally have some features worse than the stock guns, and some better. In some cases they are generally accepted to be better than the default weapons, as in the case of the P90, and in other cases worse, like the MP7. However, a choice between an unlock or a stock weapon is undeniably better than only using the stock gun. The first choice loses nothing compared to the second.
So less of the HAY I CAN WIN WITH STOCK GUNS stuff, please. I understand that you can, but that still doesn't change the fact that they're unfair.
And, um, the only reason I've noticed so far is that DICE included unlocks in the game. That doesn't really work for me, since they included other unfair things, like the J10/35B matchup. Any other reasons?
Now, there are stock guns and there are unlocks. The unlocks generally have some features worse than the stock guns, and some better. In some cases they are generally accepted to be better than the default weapons, as in the case of the P90, and in other cases worse, like the MP7. However, a choice between an unlock or a stock weapon is undeniably better than only using the stock gun. The first choice loses nothing compared to the second.
So less of the HAY I CAN WIN WITH STOCK GUNS stuff, please. I understand that you can, but that still doesn't change the fact that they're unfair.
And, um, the only reason I've noticed so far is that DICE included unlocks in the game. That doesn't really work for me, since they included other unfair things, like the J10/35B matchup. Any other reasons?
For someone who considers unlocks as cheating...yet, you have them all? Chances are, you use them.
I usually try not to flame people, more their opinions, but
Mod: Personal attack edited out
Anybody can get any unlock they want by the time they hit rank 3 (though not all of them). Simply put, they ARE fair, because anyone can put in the time and effort neccesary to get an unlock. NTM they are usually fairly evened out, with pros and cons to each. The advantage is miniscule, and your premises are so wrong that there is no give and take; you are flat-out wrong.
Everyone can get unlocks if they play enough, and unlocks were included in the game. Therefore, unlocks are NOT cheating.
Unlike aimbots, which were not included in the game
Unlike widescreen monitor support, which not everyone has and can pose an unfair advantage (a wider peripheral vision).
Mod: Personal attack edited out
Anybody can get any unlock they want by the time they hit rank 3 (though not all of them). Simply put, they ARE fair, because anyone can put in the time and effort neccesary to get an unlock. NTM they are usually fairly evened out, with pros and cons to each. The advantage is miniscule, and your premises are so wrong that there is no give and take; you are flat-out wrong.
Everyone can get unlocks if they play enough, and unlocks were included in the game. Therefore, unlocks are NOT cheating.
Unlike aimbots, which were not included in the game
Unlike widescreen monitor support, which not everyone has and can pose an unfair advantage (a wider peripheral vision).
since you're not making any friends with this thread, poor person, i shall karma you.
[pause]
not.
[pause]
not.
I don't care about them , It is easy to deal with them using stocks ; but I personally respect non-unlock players more .
I vote we light a Bonn fire, then stick a spit up his arse and leave him on top.[=][=]DADDYOFDEATH wrote:
is he flamed enough yet or do we have more for this arsehole?
edit: typo
Last edited by Tas3674 (2006-09-25 18:06:39)
Topic closed
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Using unlocks is equivalent to cheating