BF2S Forums 9/11/2001

Kmarion wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

No but I'm sure my souce did. Obviously you didn't click the link or you would have known I was quoting the lead structural engineer of the World Trade Center towers. What was your source again?

Your source is the guy who cut a lot of fucking corners.

Still waiting on your proof and source.

lol keep believing everything you read then. AMERICA WOULD NEVER BUILD SHITTY BUILDINGS BECAUSE AMERICA IS NUMBER ONE GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Do you want me to cite my source? A personal source? You want me to name drop so you can pretend you've heard of him or what?

Ikarti wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

Your source is the guy who cut a lot of fucking corners.

Still waiting on your proof and source.

lol keep believing everything you read then. AMERICA WOULD NEVER BUILD SHITTY BUILDINGS BECAUSE AMERICA IS NUMBER ONE GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Do you want me to cite my source? A personal source? You want me to name drop so you can pretend you've heard of him or what?

No but if you say something have evidence to support it. I don't care about name dropping or who your "personal" source is just have proof that can be verified. This is a simple concept of debate.

Ikarti wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

lol keep believing everything you read then. AMERICA WOULD NEVER BUILD SHITTY BUILDINGS BECAUSE AMERICA IS NUMBER ONE GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Do you want me to cite my source? A personal source? You want me to name drop so you can pretend you've heard of him or what?

No but if you say something have evidence to support it. I don't care about name dropping or who your "personal" source is just have proof that can be verified. This is a simple concept of debate.

If you say so.

Nice rebuttle.

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

TheSuicideCommando wrote:

removed by mod

take a chill pill

Nope, that i said is TRUE, come to Argentina if u dont believe me, u will see thiefs around ALL the place.

Last edited by TheSuicideCommando (2006-09-11 09:03:35)

what problem about language ?

stryyker wrote:

delta4bravo*nl* wrote:

The terrorist have always been hunted, remember seal team6 in the early 80's.
only now war is a marketing tool for the BUSH family and the Media loves it to....

you cant "hunt" terrorism. Because terrorism is an idea,  Because the minute you kill one, 2 take his place.

and i'm starting to not like you, you seem to be making light of this whole event. If 3,000 people died by a bomb in the Netherlands today, would you like it if i said "eh, in the long run it wasnt that bad"?

Was "National Socialism" not an idea too? - the problem with Al-Quaeda is it's a myth; it's a construction of many different organisations/groupings which are lumped together as "al-Quaeda" so that it can exist in peoples minds and they can focus on it as a "Real" entity.  The thing is -  it's not a nation, or, a country, it's not defined by a geological location or have a soldiers uniform.  It doesn't have an address - until the US government decides where it's residing like, say Iraq.  That's the problem with Al-quaeda it's whatever the government wants it to be - it doesn't define its self.   Fact of the matter stands that the majority of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia - which seems to be the last place on the planet your government is looking for justice for 9/11 in. I wonder why? it just doesn't make any sense to me as an onlooker.

Last edited by IG-Calibre (2006-09-11 09:10:40)

are you addressing me?

CameronPoe wrote:

rawls2 wrote:

aardfrith wrote:

Go on, tell me, why are your fellow Americans dying in Iraq on a daily basis?

I, for one, will be out drinking beers and celebrating tomorrow night.  It is, after all, my best mate's birthday.

They are dying over there so you and your mate can get shitfaced drunk with out the fear of getting blown up by a islamic terrorist.

LOL. If you think you are any less likely of being attacked because your fellow countrymen are dying out in some dusty distant country then you have issues. Tell the same thing to the bereaved from the Madrid and London bombings. Offence is not the best defence. DEFENCE is the best defence.

You dont get it do you.  It is an ALL voluntary military.  If people wouldn't volunteer, they would be drafted or forced into service.   So yes, they are dying so they can sit home and drink.  It is a valid point and the truth hurts sometimes.

You know what's funny is if you asked Americans if they felt more secure now that pre-911 the would say no. But if you ask them if they think we are doing a better job of protecting ourselves they would say yes. The difference is most Americans were not aware of how big a threat terrorism was to them before. I can tell you this, if you asked us 5 years ago from today if we thought our homeland would be attacked again by now I'm sure most would say yes. So I would have to say yes I think we are less liekly to be attacked but I also know it is still just a matter of time.

Last edited by Kmarion (2006-09-11 09:40:38)

I think a most interesting question today that I ask of Americans as you reflect on what happened. Has anyone forgiven those who did what they did that eventful day with all their hearts?

ghettoperson wrote:

Civilians killed due to the terrorist events of 9/11: 2,973
Estimaetd number of civilians killed worldwide since 9/11 as a result of the "War on Terror": 72,000
Number of detainees at Guantanamo Bay (held without haebus corpus): 455

Front page of the Independant today.

Guess no one cares about the other people...

Did you say that about all the Steve Irwin threads?

usmarine2005 wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Civilians killed due to the terrorist events of 9/11: 2,973
Estimaetd number of civilians killed worldwide since 9/11 as a result of the "War on Terror": 72,000
Number of detainees at Guantanamo Bay (held without haebus corpus): 455

Front page of the Independant today.

Guess no one cares about the other people...

Did you say that about all the Steve Irwin threads?

I'm sorry, I must have missed the thousands of civilians killed as a result of Steve Irwin dying...

ghettoperson wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Civilians killed due to the terrorist events of 9/11: 2,973
Estimaetd number of civilians killed worldwide since 9/11 as a result of the "War on Terror": 72,000
Number of detainees at Guantanamo Bay (held without haebus corpus): 455

Front page of the Independant today.

Guess no one cares about the other people...

Did you say that about all the Steve Irwin threads?

I'm sorry, I must have missed the thousands of civilians killed as a result of Steve Irwin dying...

This is the third time someone has used the deaths of thousands of other people as a tool to promote what they feel is a fact  that  Americans don't care about anything else but themselves.
The fact is the only time they seem to care is when they see it as an opportunity to use their numbers as anti-American propaganda. And that's the truth.