Salvia mmmk?
Last trip felt like it was lasting for hours.
Last trip felt like it was lasting for hours.
Shrooms | 47% | 47% - 63 | ||||
Lsd | 30% | 30% - 41 | ||||
Salvia | 12% | 12% - 17 | ||||
Peyote | 9% | 9% - 13 | ||||
Total: 134 |
No you're not.haffeysucks wrote:
When you quote a quote you are agreeing with the quote, mmk?beeng wrote:
Most useless post ever.haffeysucks wrote:
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
DMT last for about 20mins with one hit. You are initially completely fucked for about 30 sec, in which time the world around you literally looks like its made from rainbow coloured crystals. Then you trip for about 10min then chill like youve done heroin, very intense shit. And that hit was about the size of a grain of sand. Value for money acid is better but dmt is crazy, remember to start off with a small bit first though!Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Out of those options - shrooms.
Peyote - I haven't done.
Salvia - pointless - you have to smoke a ton of it to get any effect what-so-ever.
LSD - I like, but is a little too 'chemical' for me.
Shrooms - natural, gentle and as good as any acid trip.
Some other options you missed are:
Ketamine - this is like nothing else I've tried - truly takes you 'elsewhere'...
DMT - another I haven't yet done, but could well take the place of shrooms as my favourite if I did, from what I hear about it.
is that what the winamp plugin is named for ...EvilMonkeySlayer wrote:
Milkdrop.
A nice shiny banana to those who know what it is, an inanimate carbon rod for those who don't.
Last edited by Ether151 (2006-09-08 16:21:02)
Anyone agree with me? The fuck is he talking about?Harmonics wrote:
No you're not.haffeysucks wrote:
When you quote a quote you are agreeing with the quote, mmk?beeng wrote:
Most useless post ever.
Forum nub.
Last edited by haffeysucks (2006-09-08 17:31:39)
No, the main purpose of quoting is to let people know who and what your response is directed towards. If you quote and say nothing (or QFE, QFT) then you are agreeing, if your post clearly states that your not, then it's obvious what your views are. I personally don't think you believe what you said, you were just trying to be an asshole.haffeysucks wrote:
Anyone agree with me? The fuck is he talking about?Harmonics wrote:
No you're not.haffeysucks wrote:
When you quote a quote you are agreeing with the quote, mmk?
Forum nub.
Alchohol does far more damage than either Acid or Shrooms. In comparison, alchohol is the hard drug.R3v4n wrote:
A couple of drinks with some mates is fine but doing acid, shoorms man that shit is stupid, u a retard if you do that hard stuff.
Mix them with Orange Juice to avoid that - you could even combine it with your shroom chocolate recipe....RTG_ILLUSION wrote:
WATCH OUT for the shrooms that make you puke.
How so? I work very hard and like a spliff and a stella when i finish my 60hr week, from some of the shit you come out with i'd class you as the looser in dire need of some mind expanding medication. Different toys for different boys i say.kr@cker wrote:
you're all on drugs, losers
i think that all people saying "drugs are good" in some way or form need a waay better argument.JohnnyBlanco wrote:
How so? I work very hard and like a spliff and a stella when i finish my 60hr week, from some of the shit you come out with i'd class you as the looser in dire need of some mind expanding medication. Different toys for different boys i say.kr@cker wrote:
you're all on drugs, losers
I did not say drugs are good, just that some people choose to do them. To say drug users are loosers is very naive, you sound like you dont get out much!FFLink13 wrote:
i think that all people saying "drugs are good" in some way or form need a waay better argument.JohnnyBlanco wrote:
How so? I work very hard and like a spliff and a stella when i finish my 60hr week, from some of the shit you come out with i'd class you as the looser in dire need of some mind expanding medication. Different toys for different boys i say.kr@cker wrote:
you're all on drugs, losers
and you should not pick on people who don't, that just makes you a complete prick.
you may say "well they called me something first" or some crap like that, and to be honest, you diserve it and are allowed to be called names and the such, as your the ones doing the drugs, which kill.
no arguemnt can say the drugs you do are good.
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-09-10 15:08:59)
So trueScorpion0x17 wrote:
The 'drugs are bad' vs 'drugs are good' argument is pointless - they're neither good nor bad.
Alcohol is a drug - is that good or bad?
Coffee is a drug - is that good or bad?
Sugar is a drug - is that good or bad?
Food is a drug - is that good or bad?
The drug itself is not the problem - it's the person taking the drug - drug abuse is bad, drug use is fine.
You say not to pick on non drug users, because it makes you a prick. No one I know talks shit to people who don't do drugs. It's usually the non-users putting the other ones down.FFLink13 wrote:
i think that all people saying "drugs are good" in some way or form need a waay better argument.
and you should not pick on people who don't, that just makes you a complete prick.
you may say "well they called me something first" or some crap like that, and to be honest, you diserve it and are allowed to be called names and the such, as your the ones doing the drugs, which kill.
no arguemnt can say the drugs you do are good.
dquinner wrote:
So trueScorpion0x17 wrote:
The 'drugs are bad' vs 'drugs are good' argument is pointless - they're neither good nor bad.
Alcohol is a drug - is that good or bad?
Coffee is a drug - is that good or bad?
Sugar is a drug - is that good or bad?
Food is a drug - is that good or bad?
The drug itself is not the problem - it's the person taking the drug - drug abuse is bad, drug use is fine.
food is needed to survive, therefore that should be kept out really. only other thing on that list i consume is sugar. i don't see how anyone can say drugs are good, as all they do is with mess with you (obviously i'm not talking about the good drugs. i jsut thought i'd say this before some piss head tries to be smart). yes i'm young (16), but that still doesn't mean i don't know what is right and/or wrong. is there any good points you can come up with that proves/shows that drugs are good (again, i'm not talking about the medicine drugs)? and points such as "they helped me bang this chick" or "helped me have a good time on my birthday" don't count at all.mKmalfunction wrote:
You say not to pick on non drug users, because it makes you a prick. No one I know talks shit to people who don't do drugs. It's usually the non-users putting the other ones down.FFLink13 wrote:
i think that all people saying "drugs are good" in some way or form need a waay better argument.
and you should not pick on people who don't, that just makes you a complete prick.
you may say "well they called me something first" or some crap like that, and to be honest, you diserve it and are allowed to be called names and the such, as your the ones doing the drugs, which kill.
no arguemnt can say the drugs you do are good.
Not all drugs kill. Also, you spelled 'deserve' wrong. (A few other grammar and spelling errors, but I make 'em too.) So I can forgive your ignorance, because you're obviously still young, and a lot of people have put a lot of money into conditioning your brain to work this way. Really, it's not your fault. You've just submitted to the propaganda telling you that drug users have no soul, eat babies, and are sub-human.
Maybe reading the following will change your perspective. Hopefully it wont turn you into a user, since you'll probably harsh the mellow of everyone around you.dquinner wrote:
So trueScorpion0x17 wrote:
The 'drugs are bad' vs 'drugs are good' argument is pointless - they're neither good nor bad.
Alcohol is a drug - is that good or bad?
Coffee is a drug - is that good or bad?
Sugar is a drug - is that good or bad?
Food is a drug - is that good or bad?
The drug itself is not the problem - it's the person taking the drug - drug abuse is bad, drug use is fine.
Last edited by FFLink13 (2006-09-13 13:49:01)