Need help (Low fps very low )...

2006-09-01 09:36:40

#1

Israel-bf2: Member; +2|6468

My fps is about 40-60 !!
in 32 players servers!!
i have AMD 3800x2
1 gb of ram
x1800xt 256
WIn xp sp 1
80gb sata2
no viruses
and spywears
oh and my ping became very high 2
from 100 to 200\400

thats sucks :'(
oh and in single player
50-70 fps
and lags
I play on high medium graphics

Last edited by Israel-bf2 (2006-09-01 09:38:34)

2006-09-01 09:45:29

#2

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6475|cuntshitlake

try low graphs gay

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2006-09-01 09:46:12

#3

loonitic: ...is a potty mouth; +286|6546|Valhalla

My ping has been playing up aswell its usally 20-30 but has risen to 100+ (very high for me) also been getting a bit of lag.
But as of recent i have noticed a few servers with lag and some without
Also have you tried a Defrag (sometimes work for me)

2006-09-01 09:46:32

#4

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6534|...

what processes do you have running

2006-09-01 09:47:28

#5

Aardcore: Member; +60|6725|USA, Arizona

Dude, more RAM is needed in your system! Your graphics are being bottlenecked by the lack of RAM which your graphics are trying to process in realtime.

More RAM is your solution, friend.

2006-09-01 09:48:42

#6

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6534|...

I've played with !GB without lag ..

How bad is it can u articulate?

2006-09-01 09:49:05

#7

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6475|cuntshitlake

and try servers in your own country. for better ping..

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2006-09-01 09:59:44

#8

Israel-bf2: Member; +2|6468

Yo dudes
I have only 14 procces running!
in my country i have cood pings 9-20
oh and something else
can I delete the big CACHE file (ny documents\bf2...
and i have the same FPS
at low graphics 60-90
(

Last edited by Israel-bf2 (2006-09-01 10:00:56)

2006-09-01 10:08:28

#9

Rogue_Delta: Member; +6|6467

Israel-bf2 wrote:
Yo dudes
I have only 14 procces running!
in my country i have cood pings 9-20
oh and something else
can I delete the big CACHE file (ny documents\bf2...
and i have the same FPS
at low graphics 60-90
(

is 60~90 FPS bad? didn't think so...

2006-09-01 10:09:23

#10

Israel-bf2: Member; +2|6468

but in multi player ??!!
40-60

2006-09-01 10:11:41

#11

S1lent-Stryke: Member; +12|6542|UK

have you downloaded the latest AMDx2 software update?

2006-09-01 10:12:06

#12

Israel-bf2: Member; +2|6468

no why?

2006-09-01 10:12:28

#13

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6534|...

Israel-bf2 wrote:
but in multi player ??!!
40-60

Take a look at what running .. you see lag in single and multi and ur pings are higher? get TcpView form http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/TcpView.html .. see whats talking

Last edited by jsnipy (2006-09-01 10:13:26)

2006-09-01 10:15:13

#14

obstacle02: Member; +3|6528

Israel-bf2 wrote:
My fps is about 40-60 !!
in 32 players servers!!

woah, what the hell?! you're whining about 40-60 fps?! that's not bad at all, man.

2006-09-01 10:16:25

#15

Israel-bf2: Member; +2|6468

not bad???!!

2006-09-01 10:17:05

#16

S1lent-Stryke: Member; +12|6542|UK

Israel-bf2 wrote:
no why?

well then it might be worth doing then! I have the same processor as you, and before I installed the x2 patch I had to keep setting the affinity to single core from the task manager to get a stable connection. In fact try that: Start BF2, Alt+Tab out, goto task manager, right click bf2.exe and set affinity to either of the cores but not both - see if that makes a difference. If it does then go to AMD's site and get the patch.

2006-09-01 10:20:36

#17

Aardcore: Member; +60|6725|USA, Arizona

jsnipy wrote:
I've played with !GB without lag ..

How bad is it can u articulate?

I dunno how you played 1GB without lag but I for one know that with more RAM, the game just feels better. To articulate, I'll simplify it the best way I know it best.

To me, RAM works like a funnel, the more RAM, the bigger the funnel, the higher amount of water will be yielded, in these terms we'll let water stand for realtime information & graphics processing.

So I see it like this:

\\ // 1 GB... \\ // 2GB
\\ // \\ //
\\ // \\ //
|| || \\ //
|| ||

And so forth...

While the exit upon entry doesn't seem that significant, it's the process at which the information will be drained into this funnel effect where it counts, 1GB can handle a decent load, but definitely not enough worth dealing with. 2GB or more and you're set.

2006-09-01 10:23:57

#18

SnobbyBoss: SAS Medic; +18|6752

wow complaning about 40-60? im happy with 20.

2006-09-01 10:24:15

#19

RoosterCantrell: Goodbye :); +399|6492|Somewhere else

Just a thought, probably not the case, but sometimes modems (and Routers, if you got one) need reset. Every so often I unplug my modem plug it back in to reset it every so often. Sometimes it slows its performance...

2006-09-01 10:28:47

#20

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6534|...

Aardcore wrote:
jsnipy wrote:
I've played with !GB without lag ..

How bad is it can u articulate?
I dunno how you played 1GB without lag but I for one know that with more RAM, the game just feels better. To articulate, I'll simplify it the best way I know it best.

To me, RAM works like a funnel, the more RAM, the bigger the funnel, the higher amount of water will be yielded, in these terms we'll let water stand for realtime information & graphics processing.

So I see it like this:

\\ // 1 GB... \\ // 2GB
\\ // \\ //
\\ // \\ //
|| || \\ //
|| ||

And so forth...

While the exit upon entry doesn't seem that significant, it's the process at which the information will be drained into this funnel effect where it counts, 1GB can handle a decent load, but definitely not enough worth dealing with. 2GB or more and you're set.

Not YOU articulate, the poster in his lag perception ... i probally didnt have lag because everything is very stable and cool .. I everyhting not necitiy (dev, ect) on vm's

I agree 2 felt much better ... but what he is talking about is CHANGE .. if he perceived one thing and now something is different .. the fact he had 1 gb all along is not part of the troubleshooting equation.

Last edited by jsnipy (2006-09-01 10:32:27)

2006-09-01 10:30:28