I agree that taste is a subjective thing, so who the hell is right?fon|sl4y3r wrote:
I show them respect, but dont see them as metal, sry about that.
The metalguitaristheors of today, like Jeff Loomis of Nevermore, Michael and Christopher Amott of Arch Enemy, Kirk Hammet of Metallica, John Petrucci of Dream Theater etc. have pretty highend skills on their instruments, a requierment for metalmusic in my opinion, and are hard to cover, even for a expirienst musician.
The Sabbath songs even could be covered by a 11 years old, you see.
Sorry, if Im pissing you off with a kind of disrespect, dont get me wrong on this, I respect them, but they are not metal.
If you compare a average heavymetal band like, well lets say erm, yeah Stone Sour (band of Corey Taylor from Slipknot and a what I call heavymetal band, no newmetalstuff) with Sabbath, I bet you´ll say the new band got more balls, better songwriting- and instrumentskills.
Im 29 years old btw. and yes, I listen to older stuff like Leppard, Zeppelin, Sabbath, Uriah etc. too, but I will not call them heavymetal at all.
Thank god, the taste of music is nothing to discuss about, altough this is very intressting.
+1 for the Topicstarter
Regarding Black Sabbath, I totally understand your point, but I don't share it, coz like you said, every 11 years old could cover Paranoid or Smoke in the Water (Deep Purple), easier perhaps, but the thing is these bands did it more than 30 years ago, and most important, you may cover them but you won't sound like them ever. If Ozzy'd walk in front of me I would have to get in my knees and praise him coz he's the godfather of all fucking heavy metal, and we all must thank him for ever.
Thanks for karma.