ok, first off Intel core 2 duo e6700 (2.67GHz) $645 the 2.4 is $425, NOT $350, the extreme is $1200, AMD Athlon 64 FX62 $835.33, so if I go with you the first thing you'll notice is that Intels 2nd BEST processor is the closest in price to the BEST processor, which show that you will ALWAYS pay 1/2 to twice as much for Intels as you would for the AMD, if they were car companies having their cars reviewed they reviewers compare same class cars of each maker, what you are doing is trying to compare a tercel to a accord instead of comparing it to a camary which is what you should do.
Now you cannot honestly tell me that you believe that a core2, which is TWO PROCESSORS in a SINGLE CHIP SHARING ONE BUS FOR ALL DATA TRANSFER, does not have to take turns???
If this IS your stand on this then you should work for Caltrans so you can show them how to condense 2 lanes for traffic into just one WITHOUT EACH CAR TAKING TURNS TO MERGE, or I guess you might believe both lanes can just keep going at the same time and by pixi dust magic, nothing crashes. The only way each core can move data at the same time is for each one to have it's own dedicated bus to use, EXAACTLY how memory works when in a dual channel configuration.
Lastly, I don't if you're AMD or Intel, ALL PCI EXPRESS based systems have a flaw that will be it's undueing and that is If you have 1 pci-e device it gets 100% odf the bus bandwidth, add a 2nd, now each only get 1/2 of the total, a 3rd now all are 1/3 total, 4th, you get it. So with the intergrated pci-e sound, SATA & usually the nic card too, thats 1/3 there, add 1 video, 1/4 sli video, 1/5. Don't believe me? Look it up yourself, try
www.tomshardware.com , while your there look up NEW 950 nvidia chipset that is DUAL NORTHBRIDGE CHIPS THAT ACTUALLY HAS THEIR OWN BUSES not to meantion one the the northbridge chip has a built in memory controler so if they want they can design a board that has memory slots on it just to install DDR memory dedicated to the northbidge, That is the chip that controls the buses of most crucial areas like hard drive, pci express bus, etc.
That is just a tiny piece of the whole hardware part but there is still the software side of it too. If the software is not expressly writen to use any feature from dual core to a usb port that has special instructions you will not ever fully benefit from it , in fact it can cause you problems, case in point, BF2, you must set the SLI settings of a SLI video installed system to Single GPU SLI mode, which is a compatiblity mode, you know that windows safe mode is a compatibilty mode too, would play bf2 in safe mode? I wouldn't.A benchmark program is only good for one purpose, that is to gauge the effect any change from settings to drivers, you made and if performance got better or took a hit. If I got say, 3dmark and it happens that the programer knew more about the insturctions in AMD's and Nvidia based video then Intels and ATI video you would find that AMD/Nvidia scored better than Intel/ATI combos, but 3DMark is not gonna have a little note that tells you what the programer knows or doesn't know. Sure with Intel you can rip MP3's or DVD's and play bf2 and you can'yt on a AMD but guess what, stop the dvd stuff, bf2 is still running exactly the way, no less performance if you are yet no gain in performance in bf2 when you're not so no edge, I got 5 PC's and a alienware laptop so if I want to do both I do both and I don't have to stop playing bf2 becasue it is done reading and now needs a blank or to click next cause I'd do it on the laptop next to me
I could keep going there is a lot more info you obviously didn't know when you posted but I believe I have given enough to back my claim to my knowledge of a computer besides a couple of qoutes around a poor attempt at an insult. Now for some credentials too:
ITT TECH Graduate GPA 3.2 Honors
Dec 1996
AA in Electronic Engineering Technology
Which covers from basic electrontics thru all types of electrical Technology including Satellite communications & even Programing in DEBUG, also known as machine language, that is how data is done at the motherboard level.
I have 10 years experience just since a Graduated alone so I will not even bring up the 15 yrs before that. worked for companies like FEDEx and GTE to a government employee for a county in California. oh yea and have been 1/2 partner in my own company for over 7 yrs and that is why I "used to work for the others" and not currently.
I do not know everything there is to know, nobody does, you can't there is too many different hardware designs meaning too many possible varibles depending on what is used with what and how.Do I know more than you? Honestly I probably forgot more than you know and you still might know something , or a trick that I don't but I will learn it soon or later while you miss things because you are too busy knowing everything already. What you have is like having SATA and then telling me that I don't know what I am talking about when I say SCSI is better than SATA. I have built IBM 700 servers that ran 4 pentium pro processors in them, sepperate processors, on sepperate buses, hmmm imagine that