I clearly don't get it.

2006-08-14 15:25:45

#1

Dersmikner: Member; +147|6741|Texas

Ahmadinejad gets on TV and says "the country of Israel should be wiped from the Earth."

I must be missing something. He's basically saying "as soon as we are big enough, bad enough, and can get away with it, we're taking you out."

Am I on crack or is the world just full of candy-asses and tards?

How is that statement, "we'd like to wipe you out", not justification for a nuke?

I need one of these Islamo-sympathizers to give me a good reason why Israel should sit around and wait for Ahmadinejad to be able to carry out his goal instead of leveling his country.

I can guarantee you that if I were President and the president of another country said "we'd like to pretty much wipe the U.S. off the map", that country would have about 48 hours remaining on this planet.

2006-08-14 15:48:22

#2

alpinestar: Member; +304|6839|New York City baby.

You think it's just them saying that ?
Open your eyes.

2006-08-14 15:49:16

#3

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6799

Dersmikner wrote:
Ahmadinejad gets on TV and says "the country of Israel should be wiped from the Earth."

I must be missing something. He's basically saying "as soon as we are big enough, bad enough, and can get away with it, we're taking you out."

Am I on crack or is the world just full of candy-asses and tards?

How is that statement, "we'd like to wipe you out", not justification for a nuke?

I need one of these Islamo-sympathizers to give me a good reason why Israel should sit around and wait for Ahmadinejad to be able to carry out his goal instead of leveling his country.

I can guarantee you that if I were President and the president of another country said "we'd like to pretty much wipe the U.S. off the map", that country would have about 48 hours remaining on this planet.

He can say that because if Israel do pre-emptively exercise their nuclear capabilities then it will probably sound their death knell as all European countries will likely completely boycott Israel and all arabs and muslims from all over the entire middle east will round on Israel and by virtue of numbers and spread alone, will destroy Israel. Let's face it - Israel's Hezbollah spat was no 'six-day' war. Damned if they do, damned if they don't - it appears that Israel is on borrowed time.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-08-14 15:58:45)

2006-08-14 15:49:17

#4

Miller: IT'S MILLER TIME!; +271|6999|United States of America

Dunno, I say we go into Iran now. +1 for you coming into the light

2006-08-14 15:50:51

#5

LaidBackNinja: Pony Slaystation; +343|6952|Charlie One Alpha

I told you Iran was next.

"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell

2006-08-14 15:56:52

#6

alpinestar: Member; +304|6839|New York City baby.

MMMM the oil paradise for our humvees.

2006-08-14 15:58:08

#7

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6799

Miller wrote:
Dunno, I say we go into Iran now. +1 for you coming into the light

Why? They didn't threaten USA. Iraq wasn't exactly the raging success the US public was sold. Neither was Afghanistan come to mention it.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-08-14 16:18:39)

2006-08-14 18:03:56

#8

The_Shipbuilder: Stay the corpse; +261|6744|Los Angeles

If a leader of a country talks shit, the country should be nuked, and the citizens should all die. Because all citizens agree with their country's leader.

2006-08-14 18:39:13

#9

Sgt.Zubie: Member; +77|6819

Dersmikner wrote:
Ahmadinejad gets on TV and says "the country of Israel should be wiped from the Earth."

I must be missing something. He's basically saying "as soon as we are big enough, bad enough, and can get away with it, we're taking you out."

Am I on crack or is the world just full of candy-asses and tards?

How is that statement, "we'd like to wipe you out", not justification for a nuke?

I need one of these Islamo-sympathizers to give me a good reason why Israel should sit around and wait for Ahmadinejad to be able to carry out his goal instead of leveling his country.

I can guarantee you that if I were President and the president of another country said "we'd like to pretty much wipe the U.S. off the map", that country would have about 48 hours remaining on this planet.

I understand what you are saying.

The way the extremist see it and this is not a small number, tens of thousands agree. Israel can either move to another continuant or be destroyed.

Israel is not moving, it will be the end of the World as we know it when this is resolved. Sorry mates, that's just the way it is.

2006-08-14 18:40:56

#10

Snowman111: Member; +2|6833

I just met with a representative from AIPAC or the American Israli Public Afairs Commity and he open my mind on how Isreal exsits with its Islamic neighbors. Isreal although being a common enemy for many countries in the middle east acts as a peace keeper. For instance on a suni forum a man asked if he could pray for the succes of a shite terrorist group targeting Isreal. The responce from the admin was...." Absolutly not, we hate the Zionists (Jews) but we hate the Shites more, you must never pray for them, even if we share the same goal." This mentality of hate between these parties shows why the pupet gov. in Iraq will never work, but it also protects Isreal. So I would not be too worried about Isreal right now the can handle them selfs. Oh by the way Isreal does not officialy have Nuclear weapons.

2006-08-14 18:41:29

#11

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6805

Sgt.Zubie wrote:
Israel is not moving, it will be the end of the World as we know it when this is resolved. Sorry mates, that's just the way it is.

My world doesn't stop just because an expansionist non-Muslim nation in the Middle East disappears. Sorry, that's just the way it is.

2006-08-14 18:41:35

#12

GR34: Member; +215|6788|ALBERTA> CANADA

do u just love war!

2006-08-14 18:44:42

#13

Ikarti: Banned - for ever.; +231|6952|Wilmington, DE, US

Dersmikner wrote:
Ahmadinejad gets on TV and says "the country of Israel should be wiped from the Earth."

I must be missing something. He's basically saying "as soon as we are big enough, bad enough, and can get away with it, we're taking you out."

Am I on crack or is the world just full of candy-asses and tards?

How is that statement, "we'd like to wipe you out", not justification for a nuke?

I need one of these Islamo-sympathizers to give me a good reason why Israel should sit around and wait for Ahmadinejad to be able to carry out his goal instead of leveling his country.

I can guarantee you that if I were President and the president of another country said "we'd like to pretty much wipe the U.S. off the map", that country would have about 48 hours remaining on this planet.

You're on crack if you think your opinion is well thought out.

2006-08-14 18:45:27

#14

Sgt.Zubie: Member; +77|6819

Bubbalo wrote:
Sgt.Zubie wrote:
Israel is not moving, it will be the end of the World as we know it when this is resolved. Sorry mates, that's just the way it is.
My world doesn't stop just because an expansionist non-Muslim nation in the Middle East disappears. Sorry, that's just the way it is.

You only wish...don't be so sure the US will not support them even until nuclear exchanges destroy all.

I believe in a different scenario that stop's just short of this...but you wouldn't believe it. But this is the version you will get if what you believe is true.

2006-08-14 18:46:57

#15

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6805

The US will not use nukes to support Israel. Even if they did, they aren't going to toss them anywhere other than Iran, leaving me safe.

2006-08-14 18:50:57

#16

Sgt.Zubie: Member; +77|6819

Bubbalo wrote:
The US will not use nukes to support Israel. Even if they did, they aren't going to toss them anywhere other than Iran, leaving me safe.

I believe they will, let me tell you why...Because US troops will be on the ground right beside them.

2006-08-14 18:52:17

#17

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6805

Yes, I have no doubt that the US will send soldiers. There is, however, I big difference between soldiers on the ground and throwing nukes: for one, China won't be too upset about soldiers on the ground.

Last edited by Bubbalo (2006-08-14 18:52:34)

2006-08-14 18:54:26

#18

Sgt.Zubie: Member; +77|6819

Bubbalo wrote:
Yes, I have no doubt that the US will send soldiers. There is, however, I big difference between soldiers on the ground and throwing nukes: for one, China won't be too upset about soldiers on the ground.

So you think China and Russia just take it when the US starts nuking countries to keep Israel from being destroyed...Remember support for Israel runs DEEP here.

2006-08-14 18:56:23

#19

Sgt.Zubie: Member; +77|6819

Anyway this is all speculation, I just don't think you can say Israel is destroyed, and it doesn't effect me here in Aussie land.

edited for spelling

Last edited by Sgt.Zubie (2006-08-14 18:57:15)

2006-08-14 18:58:30

#20

eagles1106: Member; +269|6827|Marlton, New Jersey.

meh wth are you on....sorry but, really.....

2006-08-14 18:58:34

#21

vanmani: Unintentionally Verbose; +26|6835|Australia

I hate useless Americans (and others) who think that if a country gives sass it should be responded to with a nuclear explosion. You clearly know nothing about the environment that we depend upon.

Perhaps passing a law which states "people suggesting nuclear war as a solution to problems must endeavour to jump off a cliff at the earliest opportunity" would save the world.

2006-08-14 19:00:37

#22

Sgt.Zubie: Member; +77|6819

vanmani wrote:
I hate useless Americans (and others) who think that if a country gives sass it should be responded to with a nuclear explosion. You clearly know nothing about the environment that we depend upon.

Perhaps passing a law which states "people suggesting nuclear war as a solution to problems must endeavour to jump off a cliff at the earliest opportunity" would save the world.

LOL, If you're talking to me? I am not suggesting or advocating nuclear war...re-read my posts. It is a scenario.

2006-08-14 19:30:35

#23

The_Shipbuilder: Stay the corpse; +261|6744|Los Angeles

vanmani wrote:
I hate useless Americans (and others) who think that if a country gives sass it should be responded to with a nuclear explosion. You clearly know nothing about the environment that we depend upon.

As an American, I think we should blow up the moon.

You know, as a pre-emptive strike.

If you're not with us, you're against us, and I haven't heard jack shit from the moon. It's just a little too quiet up there, and you know what that means: lunar terrorist cell.

2006-08-14 19:50:28

#24

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6895|USA

The_Shipbuilder wrote:
vanmani wrote:
I hate useless Americans (and others) who think that if a country gives sass it should be responded to with a nuclear explosion. You clearly know nothing about the environment that we depend upon.
As an American, I think we should blow up the moon.

You know, as a pre-emptive strike.

If you're not with us, you're against us, and I haven't heard jack shit from the moon. It's just a little too quiet up there, and you know what that means: lunar terrorist cell.

..............

Last edited by lowing (2006-08-14 19:50:45)

2006-08-14 20:39:48

#25

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6805

Sgt.Zubie wrote:
So you think China and Russia just take it when the US starts nuking countries to keep Israel from being destroyed...Remember support for Israel runs DEEP here.

No, that's exactly my point: No matter how much the US likes someone (in this case Israel), they will not risk firing nukes to defend anyone but themselves.

BF2S Forums I clearly don't get it.

Dersmikner wrote:

Miller wrote:

Dersmikner wrote:

Sgt.Zubie wrote:

Dersmikner wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Sgt.Zubie wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

vanmani wrote:

vanmani wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

vanmani wrote:

Sgt.Zubie wrote:

Board footer