Your better off following your country blindly.
Haven't seen a mistake in USA's history yet.
USA #1!!!
Haven't seen a mistake in USA's history yet.
USA #1!!!
Awesome. I'm American. | 12% | 12% - 39 | ||||
Mostly good. I'm American. | 16% | 16% - 52 | ||||
Mostly bad. I'm American. | 11% | 11% - 35 | ||||
Evil. I'm American. | 21% | 21% - 68 | ||||
Awesome. I'm not American. | 2% | 2% - 9 | ||||
Mostly good. I'm not American. | 3% | 3% - 10 | ||||
Mostly bad. I'm not American. | 14% | 14% - 46 | ||||
Evil. I'm not American. | 18% | 18% - 58 | ||||
Total: 317 |
No one will ever know the whole truth except for those who voted for it in Congess and President Kennedy... most of whom are dead. I would like to see the congressional record on it though.jonsimon wrote:
Vietnam was never about liberating anyone. It was about trying to secure a french hold over the land in order to deprive the soviets of a potential ally. Every endevour during the cold war was selfishly intended to remove a potential soviet ally.Canadianinvasion wrote:
Exactly, but liberals dont care about that, its a vietnam situation again. People care about ending the war, not knowing what it is about. It is to LIBERATE COUNTRIES! It is all about giving these people the freedoms America is known for. Protesters that want their loved ones back dont understand that THEY SIGNED UP FOR THE MILITARY. If they were/are going to be killed, It comes with the job. In Vietnam, we pulled out because of a Liberalistic president, Where would we be if Gore was in office during 9/11?
Last edited by M1-Lightning (2006-08-08 12:38:23)
Last edited by Tunacommy (2006-08-08 12:40:37)
Name a president in the last 50 years that wasn't greedy and prove that the VP calls the shots. I'd love to hear this response.Tunacommy wrote:
Anyone who believes this adminisatation is good for our country is living in a fantasy land........not evil....but like some others have said - greedy.
The VP calls the shots - W is just to stupid to realize it.
And let's not forgot Carl Rove.......
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-08-08 12:48:45)
What makes you think that you would be the one getting the good deal on oil?M1-Lightning wrote:
Nah libs still think it's a "war for oil". Still waiting on that discount. Still waiting on this huge oil pipeline that Michael Moore convinced them all was coming.
for one you handle each situation differently, you don't just jump on the guns first thing, though parking nukes on soccer fields and aiming them at miami were a pretty good reason back in the 60's, the situation is vastly different now, I don't believe that they meant military intervention when the white house stated " we are ready to help the cuban people", more likely it was in reference to economic sanctions and such, i for one will be all over it looking to snap up some 50's fords.CyrusTheVirus wrote:
I'm proud of my boys. They have propelled USA towards achieving several goals in difficult circumstances. Free and fair elections in Afghanistan & Iraq. Freedom from the tyranny of Saddam and the Taliban. Osama holed up in some cave, effectively of no use to anyone. I'm guessing they are planning to bring freedom and proper democracy to Cuba and Venezuela in the very near future too. Sterling work team. If only GW could run for a thrid term - we could move on to sorting out Africa.
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-08-08 14:22:02)
QFT! That made me laugh.allfive6 wrote:
they make osama bin laden look like a grade school bully
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-08-08 14:22:58)
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLkr@cker wrote:
you bastard poe, should i +k you or cyrus?
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-08-08 14:25:59)
Carter.M1-Lightning wrote:
Name a president in the last 50 years that wasn't greedy and prove that the VP calls the shots. I'd love to hear this response.Tunacommy wrote:
Anyone who believes this adminisatation is good for our country is living in a fantasy land........not evil....but like some others have said - greedy.
The VP calls the shots - W is just to stupid to realize it.
And let's not forgot Carl Rove.......
Last edited by Tunacommy (2006-08-08 14:30:51)
They aren't the best equipped... Government contracts go to the lowest bidder, I.E. the worst equipped that is theoretically still able.kr@cker wrote:
carter was a dismal failure and his sorry kowtowing to the likes of yassir arafat are what got us into this shit today, and since when is there anything wrong with halliburton winning a contract, oooOOOOoooo they so evils fur being da best equipified!
Carter....maybe, but I don't think he was greedy.......kr@cker wrote:
carter was a dismal failure and his sorry kowtowing to the likes of yassir arafat are what got us into this shit today, and since when is there anything wrong with halliburton winning a contract, oooOOOOoooo they so evils fur being da best equipified!
BillyMack wrote:
Morons...becuase...morons...morons
And Bush fans still think American troops are "fighting for freedom" in a "war on terror". Still waiting to see headway on either. Still waiting for things to be as good as they were when Saddam was in charge.M1-Lightning wrote:
Nah libs still think it's a "war for oil". Still waiting on that discount. Still waiting on this huge oil pipeline that Michael Moore convinced them all was coming.
the adminstration didnt do that, congress does every year.BigmacK192 wrote:
You'd be incorrect. There are few people left in the US that actually support the president.The_Shipbuilder wrote:
My guess is that most American BF2 players skew to the right and will vote positively, and that the vast majority of non-Americans will vote negatively.
I'm one of those people.
Bush Administration FTW.
Proud of em'.
Actually, wasn't the problem that there was no bidding done at all? When they were gearing up for the war the contract was awarded to Halliburton on a no bid basis. Ol' Cheney knew his boys could handle it, what with his having just been employed there. And handle it they have.kr@cker wrote:
one of the arguments against Halliburton winning those contracts back when the libs were first trying to make a big stink about it was the fact that Halliburton was rarely ever the low bidder and in many cases was the highest bidder...and still won the contract, believe me, I am employed through government contract on an airforce base, they could have had much cheaper, but they would have had to go several thousand miles to find someone with a comparable resume`
Last edited by The_Shipbuilder (2006-08-08 15:52:34)