The topic title is a direct quote of George W. Bush from last Tuesday. (Source)
As we know, Cuban leader (I will not refer to him as "dictator" - You may all form your own opinions on whether he is or not) Fidel Castro's condition is getting worse by the day.
We know also that his brother Raul will probably take over after Fidel's death, since he is Vice President. This doesn't change the fact that at the point of an "immortal" leader, there will be confusion among the Cubans. The People of Cuba would maybe elect a new vice president at that point from the rows of the Communist Party of Cuba PCC.
Immediately when information arose that Castro was in weak condition, Bush stated that the U.S. is willing to help Cuba achieve democracy. Cuba will never be the same after Fidel, but does it mean that the system should fail after his death? What does the immediate response from Bush mean in practice? Cuba has a parliament whose members are elected by the people. Why can't the people elect a new leader (or vice president, since Raul as current vice will take over)?
IMHO, the biggest thing that has made Cubans "not free" is the embargo put up by the U.S., then strengthened further by the Helms-Burton Act.
What does it mean, "to free the Cuban people", when we during the last few decades have witnessed these "liberations"?
Discuss.
As we know, Cuban leader (I will not refer to him as "dictator" - You may all form your own opinions on whether he is or not) Fidel Castro's condition is getting worse by the day.
We know also that his brother Raul will probably take over after Fidel's death, since he is Vice President. This doesn't change the fact that at the point of an "immortal" leader, there will be confusion among the Cubans. The People of Cuba would maybe elect a new vice president at that point from the rows of the Communist Party of Cuba PCC.
Immediately when information arose that Castro was in weak condition, Bush stated that the U.S. is willing to help Cuba achieve democracy. Cuba will never be the same after Fidel, but does it mean that the system should fail after his death? What does the immediate response from Bush mean in practice? Cuba has a parliament whose members are elected by the people. Why can't the people elect a new leader (or vice president, since Raul as current vice will take over)?
IMHO, the biggest thing that has made Cubans "not free" is the embargo put up by the U.S., then strengthened further by the Helms-Burton Act.
What does it mean, "to free the Cuban people", when we during the last few decades have witnessed these "liberations"?
Discuss.
Last edited by DonFck (2006-08-04 02:26:10)
I need around tree fiddy.