BF2S Forums Effective Anti-Bush Propaganda

fadedsteve wrote:

I dont suscribe to anti-bush propaganda, I think its RETARDED!!!

But you'd probably subscribe to anti-liberalism propaganda, because thats not retarded one bit isn't it?

the only form of propoganda that has ever worked in history is assassination.

kessel! wrote:

check it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAXh-yiu … =Anti-Bush
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR6YE1T0 … =Anti-Bush
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDa8GYOG … =Anti-Bush
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48etGRws … =Anti-Bush

and so on and so forth
(there are more on the 'playlist')

Video 1 is racist.
Video 2 confuses WW2 with Jedi philosophy.
Video 3 creatively compares Bush with Hitler (oh, that's a new one).
Video 4 is as invalidates itself by use of widely-ridiculed polygraph technology.

Of all four, 1 is the most creative, but all the videos in question are ineffective as propaganda, but I suppose they would work on a small, gullible portion of the 'weak-minded.'

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-07-30 02:48:49)

TeamZephyr wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

I dont suscribe to anti-bush propaganda, I think its RETARDED!!!

But you'd probably subscribe to anti-liberalism propaganda, because thats not retarded one bit isn't it?

No, I don't suscribe to that either. . . 

I just think waisting time bashing Bush is pointless, the man is in his second term in the white house, he aint goin' anywhere. . . .  propaganda is propaganda, there are those who buy into it, and those who don't. 

I see the liberals for what they are, I don't need some asshole telling me fabricated stories etc. to change my views.  I am not one of them, and thats enough for me. . . .

My only question: How is the next president of the United States of America... going to deal with this current mess we're in?

Skruples wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Skruples wrote:

Having actually watched them, the first is the only one that isnt hackneyed or ridiculous. And to unnamednewbie, how is the first one racist? It would be like using a person with a french accent to intimate events in france. Get real.

Do I have to put [sarcasm] tags around everything I say?

Well, I'm guessing you weren't being sarcastic about the other three. I apologize for not picking up on it.

Sorry for the irritation, then. I guess that much of what I read and write automatically replaying in my mind as speech is the cause for my believing that other people will easily pick it up.

fadedsteve wrote:

Maybe less burocracy/red tape etc in government that would help us clear out some of the "mess" you speak of. . .

I don't know about less burocracy, but less bureaucracy might do the trick at least as far as the average citizen is concerned.

Everytime I hear bush speak reminds me how illetarate of a ucktard he is I know 3 languages and I can speak better english than him.

I'd agree most of fadedsteve's middle paragraph, and I've substitued the bits I don't agree with for the words in square brackets.
[You] need to continue to fight [the real] terrorists, and pursue them even more aggressively than [you persued] Bush [and his cronies]!!

seriously though, it reminded me again of the monty python "all scotsmen are aliens" thing, it's true just because it's on tv

UnOriginalNuttah wrote:

kr@cker wrote:

the valiant profit their country more than the finest, noblest speakers- hermocrates

And what does Bush being neither do for your country?

guess we're just SOL

alpinestar wrote:

Everytime I hear bush speak reminds me how illetarate of a ucktard he is I know 3 languages and I can speak better english than him.

I think Bush would at least get "ucktard" right.