Hey guys. Read the whole article and take a look at what page the book was opened to when they found it. Very peculiar. Conincidence?
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/07 … index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/07 … index.html
zOMG!!!111! It's a sign we should all STFU and let ISrael bomb as many civilians as they watn!!!!111Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Hey guys. Read the whole article and take a look at what page the book was opened to when they found it. Very peculiar. Conincidence?
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/07 … index.html
And it just HAPPENED to be open to that page."First of all, it's unlikely that something this fragile could survive buried in a bog at all, and then for it to be unearthed and spotted before it was destroyed is incalculably more amazing."
In the middle of a heatwave.Kaosdad008 wrote:
And it just HAPPENED to be open to that page."First of all, it's unlikely that something this fragile could survive buried in a bog at all, and then for it to be unearthed and spotted before it was destroyed is incalculably more amazing."
Smells like yesterday's diapers.
QFE.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
In the middle of a heatwave.Kaosdad008 wrote:
And it just HAPPENED to be open to that page."First of all, it's unlikely that something this fragile could survive buried in a bog at all, and then for it to be unearthed and spotted before it was destroyed is incalculably more amazing."
Smells like yesterday's diapers.
Yeh, that's what I thought too. Hmm. The National Museum of Ireland guy in the article says "it's unlikely that something this fragile could survive buried in a bog at all" and then, not two paragraphs later, "the owner of the bog has had dealings with us in past and is very much in favor of archaeological discovery and reporting it".kr@cker wrote:
yeah it's fishy, I'm just saying the part about bogs not preserving things is untrue
So which aspect of it is peculiar then? Now I don't understand.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
I don't understand. Are you guys implying Ireland has some agenda w/ Israel conflict so as to skewer this story? Or that the US news is filtering the story the way it sees fit? Im not understanding the conspiracy here. I just thought it was a rare find with a coincidental connotation relating to events of today. I see nothing more than that.
Readcyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
your post is considered spam and will be removedDrexor wrote:
Burn!!!!
The page it was "supposedly" open too is whats peculiar. Coincidence but peculiar. But not in a conspiracy sense. Im jut not sure why your article has a different legible Psalm and the CNN one is quite a bit different. Just the way this convo is going it sounds like it is being implied that this is a ploy of some type given the times we are experienceing with Israel/Lebanon. Like some sort of mislead to let Israel do what they want? I think your first post implied that to me. I may be wrong.spastic bullet wrote:
So which aspect of it is peculiar then? Now I don't understand.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
I don't understand. Are you guys implying Ireland has some agenda w/ Israel conflict so as to skewer this story? Or that the US news is filtering the story the way it sees fit? Im not understanding the conspiracy here. I just thought it was a rare find with a coincidental connotation relating to events of today. I see nothing more than that.
People, respectable Irish news sources haven't made any comments about which psalm the book was open on. The find definitely seems 100% genuine. I don't know why anyone would particularly doubt it's genuinity. We've been finding all sorts of things preserved in our boglands for year. Even quite recently two very well preserved corpses of celtic noblemen were found in the bog, complete with skin, clothing, jewellery and red hair!! THis ain't a fraud. The whole psalm 83/89 thing is either media hype or just a coincidence. Anyone what purpose would if serve to highlight that it was psalm 83? I don't get the significance.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
The page it was "supposedly" open too is whats peculiar. Coincidence but peculiar. But not in a conspiracy sense. Im jut not sure why your article has a different legible Psalm and the CNN one is quite a bit different. Just the way this convo is going it sounds like it is being implied that this is a ploy of some type given the times we are experienceing with Israel/Lebanon. Like some sort of mislead to let Israel do what they want? I think your first post implied that to me. I may be wrong.spastic bullet wrote:
So which aspect of it is peculiar then? Now I don't understand.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
I don't understand. Are you guys implying Ireland has some agenda w/ Israel conflict so as to skewer this story? Or that the US news is filtering the story the way it sees fit? Im not understanding the conspiracy here. I just thought it was a rare find with a coincidental connotation relating to events of today. I see nothing more than that.
If there is evidence of some sort of conspiracy ploy with this "find" I'm for a good convo. I just wanted to understand whats being implied by "fishy" and "smells like dirty diapers" "In a heatwave".
I'm just naturally suspicious of the way news stories propagate through syndicated networks is all. And when you consider the way North American outlets have been pushing the whole "get behind Israel because nobody else will", it's not surprising to see AP/Reuters interpret psalm 83 the way they did.CameronPoe wrote:
People, respectable Irish news sources haven't made any comments about which psalm the book was open on. The find definitely seems 100% genuine. I don't know why anyone would particularly doubt it's genuinity. We've been finding all sorts of things preserved in our boglands for year. Even quite recently two very well preserved corpses of celtic noblemen were found in the bog, complete with skin, clothing, jewellery and red hair!! THis ain't a fraud. The whole psalm 83/89 thing is either media hype or just a coincidence. Anyone what purpose would if serve to highlight that it was psalm 83? I don't get the significance.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
The page it was "supposedly" open too is whats peculiar. Coincidence but peculiar. But not in a conspiracy sense. Im jut not sure why your article has a different legible Psalm and the CNN one is quite a bit different. Just the way this convo is going it sounds like it is being implied that this is a ploy of some type given the times we are experienceing with Israel/Lebanon. Like some sort of mislead to let Israel do what they want? I think your first post implied that to me. I may be wrong.spastic bullet wrote:
So which aspect of it is peculiar then? Now I don't understand.
If there is evidence of some sort of conspiracy ploy with this "find" I'm for a good convo. I just wanted to understand whats being implied by "fishy" and "smells like dirty diapers" "In a heatwave".
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-07-26 08:50:05)
Yeah - I remember a documentary on that guy - he made millions making almost impossible to disprove 'archealogical' finds, including the sarcophagus of James, brother of Jesus. He knew archaeology inside out so he knew all the tricks that would fool the other archaeologists (down to the forensic level, etc.). He made millions on roman buttons, ancient vases all that kind of shit. Then the Israel Museum found him out and stuck him in prison I think.kr@cker wrote:
I can't for the life of me remember the name of the black tablet, but look up "Tomb, James, brother of jesus" and you'll find one of the best fakers known, he just got too greedy, he was responsible for both frauds as well as several others (on dial up at work, it would take forever for me to link it)