BF2S Forums More skill... BF2 or CS:S

bf fanboys......

CS does take skill to get headshots/stay alive/ time flashbangs.

Bf only requires you to be able to hit z and ctrl real fast. There is no bunnyhopping in CS and its a helluvalot more difficult.

However I prefer BF2

I played on servers where AWPs were locked. Office requires great skill to storm it. You have to act like a team and use smokes and flashbangs at oppurtune moments.
Yeah its easier to kill people, because you have less health and no medics, which makes it a LOT harder to survive. People complain about inaccuracy, but that is because bullets will go straying if you're running shooting. Also there were no bugs to exploit to make it easier.

CS:s definitely requires more skill in the infantry region. But yeah BF2 requires more skill in other areas, like sniping, and using vehicles.

I love BF2, but I had to give CS that vote. See, them CS players, they actually have to kill people using guns, while us Bf2 players, we just chuck 'em a C4, or a claymore, and blow 'em to hell. Although it takes more skill to play CS, it takes more intelligence to play BF2. Strategically attacking positions and the like.
Somebody mentioned CoD2 on the first page aswell. I think that is one of the most balanced games. There an equal amount of necassary intelligence and skills needed to play it. If only there were more people in those servers...

hahahahahaha cs.s is shite.

But do you have magical one shot kill AWP's to worry about?

YES!

In CS you do not have to lead targets which makes shooting way to easy.. Everything is a damn head shot.

The only reason its harder is because people have been playing CS alot longer then Battlefield so guys are extremly good at exploiting the game.

BF2 > CSS
End of dicussion.

IMO.. it's two entirely different kinds of skillsets the two games require. in CS:S you can easily win the map by having the one single super railgun god on your team. In fact, you can play 10 vs 1 and he'll usually STILL own you if he's good enough.
In BF2, you can win the game, and loose on points at the same time. Good teamwork, taking flags, and spawning with the right kit at the right time can make a world of difference, and can win your team the game. In BF2, it doesn't MATTER if you have the super railgun god on your team, even if he's never killed your team can win by taking every flag that he ISN'T at....

Add to that the fact that BF2 and aiming usually shouldn't be said in the same sentence (ok, so it might be semi possible to HOPE to hit what you're aming at with the newer patches, but 1.01 was TERRIBLE). Luck and coordination seems to be more a requirement in BF2, so that's the BF2 skills needed, whereas being able to jump/dropkick/shoot/zoom/nade while eating a sandwich seems to be the skills you need in CS:S

With that in mind, I can't say wich game require more skills. It's like comparing bananas and salt water.

EDIT: No I can't eat a sandwich and play at the same time, so I personally play BF2 not CS:S, because I can just eat during my nifty 15 seconds of quality time I get a couple of times each round.

Last edited by Twist (2006-07-23 07:20:52)

CS:S sux balls


































period

Depends on what you call skills
Hitting a guy on the foot and killing him in one shot isnt exactly what i call skills.
But neither is knifing someone in the leg and killing him in one.

Meh
Both have their weak points and high points.

CS:S is all random spray... i hate that game.

Yea and guess what about 80% of those noobs that try the gayest cheapest thing to kill someone came form CS seriers.

BF2 Requires more skill imo, there are more tactics available to implement.

CS:S on the other hand requires just a lot of practice to learn each of the guns recoil. When to fire. How do know exactly where someone is based on sounds. Etc.