Common miss conception which I will explain

2006-07-04 16:01:38

#1

TheSoprano: Tony Cipriani; +32|6553|Woodbridge, Ontario

Well for those of you who have complained about only ONE type of mod (conquest) dice decided to give you co-op whihc u fools did not like.

But there was no need for it there is already three type of game modes pre co-op mode

it was

Conquest:Double-Assault
Conquest:Head On
Conquest:Assault

so i have fixed the common missconception no need to thank me although greatly aprreactited u can give me +1 karma if you wnat

2006-07-04 16:04:57

#2

LockerFish: Member; +47|6745

Would you like to explain some more?

2006-07-04 16:05:54

#3

TheSoprano: Tony Cipriani; +32|6553|Woodbridge, Ontario

LockerFish wrote:
Would you like to explain some more?

no, i dont explaing to retards like ur self good today

Peace Borris

2006-07-04 16:06:34

#4

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6759|California

what the hell

2006-07-04 16:08:38

#5

.:ronin:.|Patton: Respekct dad i love u always; +946|6849|Marathon, Florida Keys

stryyker wrote:
what the hell

https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg

2006-07-04 16:09:01

#6

R0lyP0ly: Member; +161|6693|USA

TheSoprano wrote:
LockerFish wrote:
Would you like to explain some more?
no, i dont explaing to retards like ur self good today

Peace Borris

I think I sense a bit of hypocrisy, he called you a retard and couldn't be bothered to use any sort of proper grammar or conventions. Wow. Way to make a point, yet I feel it is misplaced. Better luck next time!

2006-07-04 16:09:22

#7

5peedy: Member; +27|6639|the Faroe Islands

i think he means that alot of peoples are complaining about not having enough of modes in BF2, but actually there are three, four if you count co-op... correct me if i'm wrong...

2006-07-04 16:10:09

#8

TheSoprano: Tony Cipriani; +32|6553|Woodbridge, Ontario

5peedy wrote:
i think he means that alot of peoples are complaining about not having enough of modes in BF2, but actually there are three, four if you count co-op... correct me if i'm wrong...

u are right my son.

2006-07-04 16:12:00

#9

Vampira_NB: Trying is the first step to failing; +76|6713|Canada Eh?

But the three Conquest modes are nearly the same, the only difference is some can give you victory by holding all the flags, one has one team with an uncap, the other has two teams with uncaps, Its the same fucking thing, Soprano is just being a prick.

2006-07-04 16:12:21

#10

TheCanadianTerrorist: Member; +111|6595

CONQUEST.

The point of the game is the same, capture flags. THAT'S WHAT CONQUEST IS. Assault and those things are in reference to how your team loses tickets I believe.

2006-07-04 16:13:16

#11

TheSoprano: Tony Cipriani; +32|6553|Woodbridge, Ontario

TheCanadianTerrorist wrote:
CONQUEST.

The point of the game is the same, capture flags. THAT'S WHAT CONQUEST IS. Assault and those things are in reference to how your team loses tickets I believe.

i wsant aware of this

2006-07-04 16:15:11

#12

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6693

common misconception:

misconception is two words and spelt as 'miss'

2006-07-04 16:15:29

#13

spawnofthemist: Banned; +1,128|6681|Burmecia, Land of the Rain

the common denominator in all modes you so expertly picked out is:

Conquest

its the same fucking mode..

ul

2006-07-04 16:17:39

#14

5peedy: Member; +27|6639|the Faroe Islands

Vampira_NB wrote:
But the three Conquest modes are nearly the same, the only difference is some can give you victory by holding all the flags, one has one team with an uncap, the other has two teams with uncaps, Its the same fucking thing, Soprano is just being a prick.

he didn't say it was dipped in candy... he said there already were three mods, and he was right.... say what you want, doesn't make any differance whatsoever...

2006-07-04 16:17:55

#15

TheSoprano: Tony Cipriani; +32|6553|Woodbridge, Ontario

spawnofthemist wrote:
the common denominator in all modes you so expertly picked out is:

Conquest

its the same fucking mode..

ul

last karma was from me by the way lol spawnofthemist couldnt fir my name

2006-07-04 16:18:40

#16

LockerFish: Member; +47|6745

Thanks to everyone that cleared that up. I wasn't really looking for such an obvious explanation that it completely slipped my mind that all those were conquest modes. Boris, if that is you, don't call people retards when you don't even use correct grammar. Seriously, your point is gone after you type like that. Sorry.

2006-07-04 16:22:57

#17

R0lyP0ly: Member; +161|6693|USA

LockerFish wrote:
Thanks to everyone that cleared that up. I wasn't really looking for such an obvious explanation that it completely slipped my mind that all those were conquest modes. Boris, if that is you, don't call people retards when you don't even use correct grammar. Seriously, your point is gone after you type like that. Sorry.

dahwn't kall me a reeetard!!!!!!!

2006-07-04 16:24:29

#18

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6693

your an retard

^ SARCASM, PEOPLE! DOO JOO SPEEK EENGLEESH?!

Last edited by SargeV1.4 (2006-07-05 00:50:31)

2006-07-04 16:28:54

#19

The Last Black Winegum: Mmmm! Winegums; +52|6645|Lancashire, UK

SargeV1.4 wrote:
common misconception:

misconception is two words and spelt as 'miss'

Actually that's a common misconception.

2006-07-04 16:34:52

#20

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6693

Is it a common misconception that it's a common misconception that misconception spelt as miss conception? or is that a misconception? that would make it a misconception that it's a common misconception that it's a common misconception that misconception spelt as miss conception

2006-07-04 16:35:26

#21

R0lyP0ly: Member; +161|6693|USA

SargeV1.4 wrote:
your an retard

dumbass. Maybe you should get together w/ your friend earlier on this page?

2006-07-04 16:36:15

#22

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6693

R0lyP0ly wrote:
SargeV1.4 wrote:
your an retard
dumbass. Maybe you should get together w/ your friend earlier on this page?

Somebody missed the bus to the 'sarcasm and other forms of not meaning what you say' class

2006-07-04 16:41:59

#23

Capt_ghost89: run and gun; +4|6552

actually misconception is right. if it was miss conception, it would be like you missed a baby being created http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conception

just saying

2006-07-04 16:45:20

#24

rh27: Not really a Brit; +51|6636|England

Capt_ghost89 wrote:
actually misconception is right. if it was miss conception, it would be like you missed a baby being created http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conception

just saying

That's what he was saying. You must have misread it.

2006-07-04 16:46:17

#25

The Last Black Winegum: Mmmm! Winegums; +52|6645|Lancashire, UK

SargeV1.4 wrote:
Is it a common misconception that it's a common misconception that misconception spelt as miss conception? or is that a misconception? that would make it a misconception that it's a common misconception that it's a common misconception that misconception spelt as miss conception

10 GOTO 20
20 GOTO 10

BF2S Forums Common miss conception which I will explain

LockerFish wrote:

stryyker wrote:

TheSoprano wrote:

LockerFish wrote:

5peedy wrote:

TheCanadianTerrorist wrote:

Vampira_NB wrote:

spawnofthemist wrote:

LockerFish wrote:

SargeV1.4 wrote:

SargeV1.4 wrote:

R0lyP0ly wrote:

SargeV1.4 wrote:

Capt_ghost89 wrote:

SargeV1.4 wrote:

Board footer