L96A1 for SAS

2006-06-15 02:30:24

#1

Smitty5613: Member; +46|6743|Middle of nowhere, California

I think that since the L96A1 is a British-made sniper, shouldn't it be the SAS's sniper in SF also. Does anyone agree with me, or is it just another one of my fantasies?

2006-06-15 06:58:19

#2

Longbow: Member; +163|6863|Odessa, Ukraine

agree

2006-06-15 16:21:20

#3

oberst_enzian: Member; +234|6959|melb.au

definitely agree, but i think SF should have a third tier of unlocks in general... it pisses me off that the L96 came with the patch the was released to make SF work, but that we can't use it in SF, as I think its the best sniper rifle given its crosshair and low noise

2006-06-15 16:23:24

#4

scottomus0: Teh forum ghey!; +172|6853|Wigan. Manchester. England.

agree so much

i hate the way you buy SF for the unlocks, only to be able to use them in vanilla

new unlockes IMO

2006-06-15 16:23:28

#5

-Whiteroom-: Pineapplewhat; +572|6875|BC, Canada

jesus... you would destroy everyone in ghosttown....

2006-06-17 03:45:41

#6

*RIP*gonzo21: Member; +11|6741|Texas

That was my first complaint when the sniper unlock was released. I hardly played sniper until I got the L96A1. Then to find out the the makers of the rifle are not allowed to use it. How gay is that?

2006-06-25 07:19:25

#7

MrE`158: Member; +103|6839

Nicholas Langdon wrote:
jesus... you would destroy everyone in ghosttown....

Well, only if you were already able to destroy them using the M24. The two aren't all *that* different, really.

2006-06-25 07:22:11

#8

Jussimies: Finnish commander whore; +76|6800|Finland

Agree.

2006-06-25 07:24:44

#9

Major Payne: Member; +18|6996|Netherlands

So the FN F2000 is a belgium weapon why do they give it to the amaricans

2006-06-25 07:26:05

#10

MDW: Member; +43|6893|Dortmund, Germany

I agree, they should also replace the Abrams tanks in the SAS missions with Challengers. The only problem is that this and the L96-change would be extreme crossovers between SF and EF, so I don't think that DICE will ever do this. They probably think like
"Hey, giving the Challenger to the SAS in SF would be more logical, but we can't do this, EA wants the Challenger-fans to buy the Euro-Booster."

Last edited by MDW (2006-06-25 07:26:23)

2006-06-25 07:36:38

#11

farmerfez: o wut?; +78|6746

I totally agree with you guys, So many times on ghosttown i was Spetzs and i had a fucking M95, wishing i had a L96. But the one thing i don't like bout the L96 is when, like only in specific spots, I look down to snipe or look at a specific area, i get goddam lag. Like on karkand, fromn the building on the square down to the market, i get some badass lag. I don't know why this is but i do only have a 5500 , but 1gig of ram. So i dono.

2006-08-25 09:03:35

#12

Delphy: Member; +45|6801|Bristol, UK

Meh the M24 is nearly as good.

2006-08-25 12:44:29

#13

Graphic: Real Horrorshow; +24|6711|Nevada

It's from Euro Force so it will never be in Special Forces, and looking at it objectively, it probably shouldn't.

2006-08-29 10:03:41

#14

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6679|cuntshitlake

agree.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2006-09-07 13:10:52

#15

Go-Devil: Does a wild bear crap in the woods, son ????; +3|6666

the f2000 is belgian made, by fn, but FN belongs to remington or another US arms maker.....
or it belongs to FN, i dunno.....

so it would be possible for US to have f2000 altough i havent ever seen us with it....

2006-09-07 13:14:32

#16

JOJOBA: my penis itches; +18|6749|Columbus, OH

yes, i absolutely agree. i think that if you have the unlock, you should be able to get the Special Forces unlock no matter what team you're on. it doesnt make sense when you're Russian, in SPECIAL FORCES, and you cant get the SPECIAL FORCES, when the British team can.

BF2S Forums L96A1 for SAS

Nicholas Langdon wrote:

Board footer